预防慢性支气管炎和慢性阻塞性肺病的恶化:黏液溶解剂的治疗潜力。

Phillippa J Poole, Peter N Black
{"title":"预防慢性支气管炎和慢性阻塞性肺病的恶化:黏液溶解剂的治疗潜力。","authors":"Phillippa J Poole,&nbsp;Peter N Black","doi":"10.1007/BF03256664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is important to find interventions that will reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD, because of their effect on morbidity and healthcare expenditure. A Cochrane systematic review included 23 studies that had evaluated the effects of treatment with mucolytic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Mucolytic treatment was associated with a significant reduction of 0.79 exacerbations per patient per year compared with placebo, a 29% decrease. Patients who received treatment with mucolytic agents were twice as likely to remain exacerbation-free in the study period than if they had received placebo, with six patients needing regular treatment with mucolytic agents for 3-6 months to achieve one less exacerbation over that time. Treatment with mucolytic agents resulted in nearly 7 days less illness per patient per year. How mucolytic agents work is unknown, although they may reduce exacerbations by altering mucus production, antioxidation, or antibacterial or immunostimulatory effects. They do not appear to affect the decline in lung function that occurs in COPD. The treatment appears to be without any adverse effects, apart from the need to take oral medication daily. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the point at which the costs of treatment and non-treatment were equal was 1.2 less exacerbations per year. This is higher than the effect observed in the Cochrane review, suggesting that treating everyone with COPD with mucolytic agents would not be cost effective. Those with more frequent and severe exacerbations appear to have the most to gain.</p>","PeriodicalId":86933,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","volume":"2 5","pages":"367-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256664","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: therapeutic potential of mucolytic agents.\",\"authors\":\"Phillippa J Poole,&nbsp;Peter N Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03256664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is important to find interventions that will reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD, because of their effect on morbidity and healthcare expenditure. A Cochrane systematic review included 23 studies that had evaluated the effects of treatment with mucolytic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Mucolytic treatment was associated with a significant reduction of 0.79 exacerbations per patient per year compared with placebo, a 29% decrease. Patients who received treatment with mucolytic agents were twice as likely to remain exacerbation-free in the study period than if they had received placebo, with six patients needing regular treatment with mucolytic agents for 3-6 months to achieve one less exacerbation over that time. Treatment with mucolytic agents resulted in nearly 7 days less illness per patient per year. How mucolytic agents work is unknown, although they may reduce exacerbations by altering mucus production, antioxidation, or antibacterial or immunostimulatory effects. They do not appear to affect the decline in lung function that occurs in COPD. The treatment appears to be without any adverse effects, apart from the need to take oral medication daily. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the point at which the costs of treatment and non-treatment were equal was 1.2 less exacerbations per year. This is higher than the effect observed in the Cochrane review, suggesting that treating everyone with COPD with mucolytic agents would not be cost effective. Those with more frequent and severe exacerbations appear to have the most to gain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":86933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions\",\"volume\":\"2 5\",\"pages\":\"367-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03256664\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

由于干预措施对发病率和卫生保健支出的影响,找到能够降低COPD恶化频率和严重程度的干预措施是很重要的。Cochrane系统回顾纳入了23项研究,这些研究评估了溶黏液剂治疗慢性支气管炎或COPD患者的效果。与安慰剂相比,黏液溶解治疗与每位患者每年0.79次恶化的显著减少相关,减少了29%。在研究期间,接受黏液溶解剂治疗的患者保持无恶化的可能性是接受安慰剂治疗的两倍,有6名患者需要接受3-6个月的黏液溶解剂常规治疗,以在此期间减少一次恶化。使用黏液溶解剂治疗,每位患者每年的患病天数减少了近7天。黏液溶解剂的作用机制尚不清楚,但它们可能通过改变黏液生成、抗氧化、抗菌或免疫刺激作用来减少病情恶化。它们似乎不会影响COPD患者肺功能的下降。除了需要每天口服药物外,这种治疗似乎没有任何副作用。成本效益分析表明,治疗和非治疗费用相等的点是每年减少1.2次恶化。这比Cochrane综述中观察到的效果要高,表明用溶黏液剂治疗所有COPD患者并不具有成本效益。那些病情更频繁和更严重的人似乎获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD: therapeutic potential of mucolytic agents.

It is important to find interventions that will reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD, because of their effect on morbidity and healthcare expenditure. A Cochrane systematic review included 23 studies that had evaluated the effects of treatment with mucolytic agents in patients with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Mucolytic treatment was associated with a significant reduction of 0.79 exacerbations per patient per year compared with placebo, a 29% decrease. Patients who received treatment with mucolytic agents were twice as likely to remain exacerbation-free in the study period than if they had received placebo, with six patients needing regular treatment with mucolytic agents for 3-6 months to achieve one less exacerbation over that time. Treatment with mucolytic agents resulted in nearly 7 days less illness per patient per year. How mucolytic agents work is unknown, although they may reduce exacerbations by altering mucus production, antioxidation, or antibacterial or immunostimulatory effects. They do not appear to affect the decline in lung function that occurs in COPD. The treatment appears to be without any adverse effects, apart from the need to take oral medication daily. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that the point at which the costs of treatment and non-treatment were equal was 1.2 less exacerbations per year. This is higher than the effect observed in the Cochrane review, suggesting that treating everyone with COPD with mucolytic agents would not be cost effective. Those with more frequent and severe exacerbations appear to have the most to gain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The emerging role of leukotriene modifiers in allergic rhinitis. Is there a role for systemic corticosteroids in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Pseudomonal infections in patients with COPD: epidemiology and management. Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy. Anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies: preclinical and clinical evidence in asthma models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1