{"title":"对1947年伯明翰所有出生人口(23,970)的观察。出生体重、妊娠持续时间和与性别有关的生存。","authors":"J R GIBSON, T McKEOWN","doi":"10.1136/jech.6.2.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BIRTH WEIGHT AND DURATION OF GESTATION That mean birth weight is higher for males than for females has been consistently recorded (for example by Pearson, 1900; Murray, 1924; Martin, 1931; Bakwin and Bakwin, 1934; Anderson, Brown, and Lyon, 1943), and more recently by Karn and Penrose (1951), Norval, Kennedy, and Berkson (1951), and Salber and Bradshaw (1951). There have been fewer investigations of duration of gestation; but in general reported differences between the two sexes have been trivial (Schlichting, 1880; Siegel, 1921; Anderson, Brown and Lyon, 1943; Karn, 1947; Karn and Penrose, 1951). Table I gives mean birth weights of the Birmingham births as 7 57 and 7 31 lb.","PeriodicalId":84321,"journal":{"name":"British journal of social medicine","volume":"6 2","pages":"152-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1952-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.6.2.152","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on all births (23,970) in Birmingham, 1947. VI. Birth weight, duration of gestation, and survival related to sex.\",\"authors\":\"J R GIBSON, T McKEOWN\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jech.6.2.152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BIRTH WEIGHT AND DURATION OF GESTATION That mean birth weight is higher for males than for females has been consistently recorded (for example by Pearson, 1900; Murray, 1924; Martin, 1931; Bakwin and Bakwin, 1934; Anderson, Brown, and Lyon, 1943), and more recently by Karn and Penrose (1951), Norval, Kennedy, and Berkson (1951), and Salber and Bradshaw (1951). There have been fewer investigations of duration of gestation; but in general reported differences between the two sexes have been trivial (Schlichting, 1880; Siegel, 1921; Anderson, Brown and Lyon, 1943; Karn, 1947; Karn and Penrose, 1951). Table I gives mean birth weights of the Birmingham births as 7 57 and 7 31 lb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"152-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1952-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jech.6.2.152\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.6.2.152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.6.2.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Observations on all births (23,970) in Birmingham, 1947. VI. Birth weight, duration of gestation, and survival related to sex.
BIRTH WEIGHT AND DURATION OF GESTATION That mean birth weight is higher for males than for females has been consistently recorded (for example by Pearson, 1900; Murray, 1924; Martin, 1931; Bakwin and Bakwin, 1934; Anderson, Brown, and Lyon, 1943), and more recently by Karn and Penrose (1951), Norval, Kennedy, and Berkson (1951), and Salber and Bradshaw (1951). There have been fewer investigations of duration of gestation; but in general reported differences between the two sexes have been trivial (Schlichting, 1880; Siegel, 1921; Anderson, Brown and Lyon, 1943; Karn, 1947; Karn and Penrose, 1951). Table I gives mean birth weights of the Birmingham births as 7 57 and 7 31 lb.