使用胆囊收缩素作为毒素摄入的辅助治疗。

Randall D Hofbauer, Joel S Holger
{"title":"使用胆囊收缩素作为毒素摄入的辅助治疗。","authors":"Randall D Hofbauer,&nbsp;Joel S Holger","doi":"10.1081/clt-120028746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine if pharmacologic trapping of ingested toxins in the stomach using cholecystokinin (CCK) in addition to activated charcoal (AC) decreases the absorption of ingested toxins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-phase study that was prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled, using a subtoxic acetaminophen (APAP) animal model. Eight adult beagle dogs were studied to detect a 20% decrease in 4h APAP levels with a power of 80%. A control arm using APAP at 100 mg/kg without AC or CCK was first performed. APAP levels were drawn at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. This was repeated in a CCK dose finding phase using a 60-min CCK infusion (4 vs. 8 pmol/kg/min) starting at 30 min post-APAP ingestion. Once the optimal CCK dose was established, animals in the treatment phase received AC and a 1 h infusion of CCK (vs. placebo). The efficacy of CCK when started at 30 and 60 min post-APAP ingestion was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dose finding arm 8 pmol/kg/min was well tolerated and also reduced maximum APAP levels by a mean of 49% from control. This dose was then used for the treatment phase. Four-hour APAP levels, maximum APAP levels, and area under the curve (AUC) were measured. No significant differences were found between placebo and CCK arms at either the 30 or 60 min postingestion interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this model, CCK infusion did not decrease the absorption of APAP. Adding charcoal to the model overcame the suggested beneficial effect of CCK alone in the dosing arm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","volume":"42 1","pages":"61-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1081/clt-120028746","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of cholecystokinin as an adjunctive treatment for toxin ingestion.\",\"authors\":\"Randall D Hofbauer,&nbsp;Joel S Holger\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/clt-120028746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine if pharmacologic trapping of ingested toxins in the stomach using cholecystokinin (CCK) in addition to activated charcoal (AC) decreases the absorption of ingested toxins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a two-phase study that was prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled, using a subtoxic acetaminophen (APAP) animal model. Eight adult beagle dogs were studied to detect a 20% decrease in 4h APAP levels with a power of 80%. A control arm using APAP at 100 mg/kg without AC or CCK was first performed. APAP levels were drawn at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. This was repeated in a CCK dose finding phase using a 60-min CCK infusion (4 vs. 8 pmol/kg/min) starting at 30 min post-APAP ingestion. Once the optimal CCK dose was established, animals in the treatment phase received AC and a 1 h infusion of CCK (vs. placebo). The efficacy of CCK when started at 30 and 60 min post-APAP ingestion was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dose finding arm 8 pmol/kg/min was well tolerated and also reduced maximum APAP levels by a mean of 49% from control. This dose was then used for the treatment phase. Four-hour APAP levels, maximum APAP levels, and area under the curve (AUC) were measured. No significant differences were found between placebo and CCK arms at either the 30 or 60 min postingestion interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this model, CCK infusion did not decrease the absorption of APAP. Adding charcoal to the model overcame the suggested beneficial effect of CCK alone in the dosing arm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"61-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1081/clt-120028746\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-120028746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/clt-120028746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究目的:确定使用胆囊收缩素(CCK)和活性炭(AC)在胃中捕获摄入的毒素是否会减少摄入的毒素的吸收。方法:采用亚毒性对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)动物模型,采用前瞻性、随机、盲法和安慰剂对照两期研究。对8只成年比格犬进行了研究,以80%的功率检测4小时APAP水平下降20%。对照组采用APAP浓度为100 mg/kg,不含AC或CCK。在0.5、1、1.5、2、4、8和24小时提取APAP水平。从APAP摄入后30分钟开始,使用60分钟的CCK输注(4比8 pmol/kg/min),在CCK剂量发现阶段重复这一过程。一旦确定了最佳CCK剂量,治疗期的动物接受AC和1小时CCK输注(与安慰剂相比)。在apap摄入后30和60分钟开始CCK的疗效进行测试。结果:在剂量发现组,8pmol /kg/min耐受性良好,最大APAP水平也比对照组平均降低了49%。该剂量随后用于治疗阶段。测定4小时APAP水平、最大APAP水平和曲线下面积(AUC)。在服用后30或60分钟,安慰剂组和CCK组之间没有发现显著差异。结论:在该模型中,CCK输注并未降低APAP的吸收。在模型中添加木炭,在给药臂中克服了单独使用CCK的有益效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of cholecystokinin as an adjunctive treatment for toxin ingestion.

Study objective: To determine if pharmacologic trapping of ingested toxins in the stomach using cholecystokinin (CCK) in addition to activated charcoal (AC) decreases the absorption of ingested toxins.

Methods: We performed a two-phase study that was prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled, using a subtoxic acetaminophen (APAP) animal model. Eight adult beagle dogs were studied to detect a 20% decrease in 4h APAP levels with a power of 80%. A control arm using APAP at 100 mg/kg without AC or CCK was first performed. APAP levels were drawn at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. This was repeated in a CCK dose finding phase using a 60-min CCK infusion (4 vs. 8 pmol/kg/min) starting at 30 min post-APAP ingestion. Once the optimal CCK dose was established, animals in the treatment phase received AC and a 1 h infusion of CCK (vs. placebo). The efficacy of CCK when started at 30 and 60 min post-APAP ingestion was tested.

Results: In the dose finding arm 8 pmol/kg/min was well tolerated and also reduced maximum APAP levels by a mean of 49% from control. This dose was then used for the treatment phase. Four-hour APAP levels, maximum APAP levels, and area under the curve (AUC) were measured. No significant differences were found between placebo and CCK arms at either the 30 or 60 min postingestion interventions.

Conclusions: In this model, CCK infusion did not decrease the absorption of APAP. Adding charcoal to the model overcame the suggested beneficial effect of CCK alone in the dosing arm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative toxicity of citalopram and the newer antidepressants after overdose. Evaluation of promotility agents to limit the gut bioavailability of extended-release acetaminophen. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of oral and sublingual cyproheptadine. Accidental poisoning with autumn crocus. N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of clove oil-induced fulminant hepatic failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1