建立过敏原制剂临床生物等效性的样本量考虑。

Ronald L Rabin, Jay E Slater, Peter Lachenbruch, Richard W Pastor
{"title":"建立过敏原制剂临床生物等效性的样本量考虑。","authors":"Ronald L Rabin,&nbsp;Jay E Slater,&nbsp;Peter Lachenbruch,&nbsp;Richard W Pastor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":77490,"journal":{"name":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","volume":" 94","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sample size considerations for establishing clinical bioequivalence of allergen formulations.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald L Rabin,&nbsp;Jay E Slater,&nbsp;Peter Lachenbruch,&nbsp;Richard W Pastor\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"volume\":\" 94\",\"pages\":\"24-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据公式1的区间假设,必须通过证明公式之间的差异在指定的区间内来建立配方的生物等效性。从表1中列出的公式8确定的样本数量的显式估计值在质量上大于从公式2(无差异假设)确定的估计值。公式8由TOST程序导出;其他有效的方法应该产生类似的结果。在任何情况下,这一讨论都表明,未能证明差异不足以证明等效性,而对过敏原配方进行适当的等效性研究通常需要四个以上的研究对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sample size considerations for establishing clinical bioequivalence of allergen formulations.

Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International units. Regulatory aspects of allergen products for immunotherapy--considerations from the viewpoint of manufacturers. EU procedures for marketing authorization of pharmaceutical products. Marketing authorization for recombinant products in Europe. The CREATE project: an introduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1