Ronald L Rabin, Jay E Slater, Peter Lachenbruch, Richard W Pastor
{"title":"建立过敏原制剂临床生物等效性的样本量考虑。","authors":"Ronald L Rabin, Jay E Slater, Peter Lachenbruch, Richard W Pastor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":77490,"journal":{"name":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","volume":" 94","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sample size considerations for establishing clinical bioequivalence of allergen formulations.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald L Rabin, Jay E Slater, Peter Lachenbruch, Richard W Pastor\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"volume\":\" 94\",\"pages\":\"24-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sample size considerations for establishing clinical bioequivalence of allergen formulations.
Bioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.