局部消融术治疗不可切除的肝肿瘤:热疗是最好的吗?

Simon A Wemyss-Holden, Ashley R Dennison, David P Berry, Guy J Maddern
{"title":"局部消融术治疗不可切除的肝肿瘤:热疗是最好的吗?","authors":"Simon A Wemyss-Holden,&nbsp;Ashley R Dennison,&nbsp;David P Berry,&nbsp;Guy J Maddern","doi":"10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hepatic resection remains the \"gold standard\" for patients with resectable disease. Nevertheless, for a variety of reasons this is not feasible for the majority of patients. A wide range of locally ablative techniques has been developed for use in these patients with the aim of improving survival. Unfortunately, as with many recent techniques in surgery, much of the development of these methods, and particularly their introduction clinically, has not been based on sound scientific data. The relative merits and limitations of the more commonly used techniques are discussed, although this lack of prospective, randomized data precludes firm conclusions to be drawn from many of the studies reported. By far the most popular methods now employed, thermal techniques have certain limitations, particularly when treating tumors adjacent to major vascular or biliary structures. The authors believe that this situation represents the \"niche\" for which ablative techniques may ultimately find their logical application, where a single awkwardly placed metastasis deems a patient unresectable. If such a metastasis can be completely and safely ablated, a potentially curative resection may then become a realistic option. The relatively new, nonthermal technique of hepatic electrolysis has been extensively studied and shown to be safe and effective in close proximity to major intrahepatic veins due to a subtle electrochemical action rather than a rapid \"burn\". This technique is discussed in the context of other, more traditional thermal methods of ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local ablation for unresectable liver tumors: is thermal best?\",\"authors\":\"Simon A Wemyss-Holden,&nbsp;Ashley R Dennison,&nbsp;David P Berry,&nbsp;Guy J Maddern\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hepatic resection remains the \\\"gold standard\\\" for patients with resectable disease. Nevertheless, for a variety of reasons this is not feasible for the majority of patients. A wide range of locally ablative techniques has been developed for use in these patients with the aim of improving survival. Unfortunately, as with many recent techniques in surgery, much of the development of these methods, and particularly their introduction clinically, has not been based on sound scientific data. The relative merits and limitations of the more commonly used techniques are discussed, although this lack of prospective, randomized data precludes firm conclusions to be drawn from many of the studies reported. By far the most popular methods now employed, thermal techniques have certain limitations, particularly when treating tumors adjacent to major vascular or biliary structures. The authors believe that this situation represents the \\\"niche\\\" for which ablative techniques may ultimately find their logical application, where a single awkwardly placed metastasis deems a patient unresectable. If such a metastasis can be completely and safely ablated, a potentially curative resection may then become a realistic option. The relatively new, nonthermal technique of hepatic electrolysis has been extensively studied and shown to be safe and effective in close proximity to major intrahepatic veins due to a subtle electrochemical action rather than a rapid \\\"burn\\\". This technique is discussed in the context of other, more traditional thermal methods of ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0715-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

肝切除仍然是可切除疾病患者的“金标准”。然而,由于种种原因,这对大多数患者来说是不可行的。广泛的局部消融技术已被开发用于这些患者,目的是提高生存率。不幸的是,正如许多最新的外科技术一样,这些方法的发展,特别是它们在临床上的引入,并没有基于可靠的科学数据。本文讨论了较为常用的技术的相对优点和局限性,尽管由于缺乏前瞻性的随机数据,因此无法从许多已报道的研究中得出确定的结论。目前使用的最流行的方法,热技术有一定的局限性,特别是在治疗靠近主要血管或胆道结构的肿瘤时。作者认为,这种情况代表了消融技术可能最终找到其合理应用的“利基”,在这种情况下,单个位置尴尬的转移认为患者无法切除。如果这样的转移可以完全安全地消融,那么潜在的治愈性切除可能成为一种现实的选择。相对较新的非热肝电解技术已经得到了广泛的研究,并且由于微妙的电化学作用而不是快速的“烧伤”,在靠近肝内主要静脉的地方显示出安全有效。该技术在其他更传统的烧蚀热方法的背景下进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Local ablation for unresectable liver tumors: is thermal best?

Hepatic resection remains the "gold standard" for patients with resectable disease. Nevertheless, for a variety of reasons this is not feasible for the majority of patients. A wide range of locally ablative techniques has been developed for use in these patients with the aim of improving survival. Unfortunately, as with many recent techniques in surgery, much of the development of these methods, and particularly their introduction clinically, has not been based on sound scientific data. The relative merits and limitations of the more commonly used techniques are discussed, although this lack of prospective, randomized data precludes firm conclusions to be drawn from many of the studies reported. By far the most popular methods now employed, thermal techniques have certain limitations, particularly when treating tumors adjacent to major vascular or biliary structures. The authors believe that this situation represents the "niche" for which ablative techniques may ultimately find their logical application, where a single awkwardly placed metastasis deems a patient unresectable. If such a metastasis can be completely and safely ablated, a potentially curative resection may then become a realistic option. The relatively new, nonthermal technique of hepatic electrolysis has been extensively studied and shown to be safe and effective in close proximity to major intrahepatic veins due to a subtle electrochemical action rather than a rapid "burn". This technique is discussed in the context of other, more traditional thermal methods of ablation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: technique, indications and results. Laparoscopic major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: formidable challenge to standardization. Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Proceedings of a consensus meeting, April 2006, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcome of selective digestive decontamination and enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Protective effects of a hibernation-inducer on hepatocyte injury induced by hypothermic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1