一种新的结直肠肝转移患者分类评分系统:肝切除术候选人选择标准的建议。

Ikuo Nagashima, Tadahiro Takada, Keiji Matsuda, Miki Adachi, Hirokazu Nagawa, Tetsuichiro Muto, Kota Okinaga
{"title":"一种新的结直肠肝转移患者分类评分系统:肝切除术候选人选择标准的建议。","authors":"Ikuo Nagashima,&nbsp;Tadahiro Takada,&nbsp;Keiji Matsuda,&nbsp;Miki Adachi,&nbsp;Hirokazu Nagawa,&nbsp;Tetsuichiro Muto,&nbsp;Kota Okinaga","doi":"10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen clinicopathological features, which were recognized only before or during surgery, were selected retrospectively in 81 consecutive patients in one hospital (Group I). These features were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent and significant variables affecting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases to select good candidates for hepatic resection. The usefulness of the new scoring system was examined in a series of 70 patients from another hospital (Group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis, i.e., Cox regression analysis, showed that serosa invasion of primary cancers (P = 0.0720, risk ratio = 2.238); local lymph node metastases of primary cancers, i.e., Dukes' C (P = 0.0976, risk ratio = 2.311); multiple nodules of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0461, risk ratio = 2.365); nodules of hepatic metastases greater than 5 cm in diameter (P =0.0030, risk ratio = 4.277); and resectable extrahepatic distant metastases (P = 0.0080, risk ratio = 4.038) were significant and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy. Using these five variables, we created a new scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new scoring system classified patients in Group II and Group I well, according to long-term outcomes after hepatic resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases is simple and useful in the preoperative selection of good candidates for hepatic resection. Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 2","pages":"79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7","citationCount":"95","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases: proposal of criteria to select candidates for hepatic resection.\",\"authors\":\"Ikuo Nagashima,&nbsp;Tadahiro Takada,&nbsp;Keiji Matsuda,&nbsp;Miki Adachi,&nbsp;Hirokazu Nagawa,&nbsp;Tetsuichiro Muto,&nbsp;Kota Okinaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen clinicopathological features, which were recognized only before or during surgery, were selected retrospectively in 81 consecutive patients in one hospital (Group I). These features were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent and significant variables affecting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases to select good candidates for hepatic resection. The usefulness of the new scoring system was examined in a series of 70 patients from another hospital (Group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis, i.e., Cox regression analysis, showed that serosa invasion of primary cancers (P = 0.0720, risk ratio = 2.238); local lymph node metastases of primary cancers, i.e., Dukes' C (P = 0.0976, risk ratio = 2.311); multiple nodules of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0461, risk ratio = 2.365); nodules of hepatic metastases greater than 5 cm in diameter (P =0.0030, risk ratio = 4.277); and resectable extrahepatic distant metastases (P = 0.0080, risk ratio = 4.038) were significant and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy. Using these five variables, we created a new scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new scoring system classified patients in Group II and Group I well, according to long-term outcomes after hepatic resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases is simple and useful in the preoperative selection of good candidates for hepatic resection. Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"79-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7\",\"citationCount\":\"95\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-002-0778-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

摘要

背景:尽管许多研究报道了肝切除术对结直肠肝转移患者生存率的有益影响,但术前选择肝切除术的良好候选者仍然很困难。方法:回顾性选择同一医院(I组)连续81例患者术前或术中发现的15项临床病理特征,对这些特征进行多因素分析,确定影响肝切除术后长期预后的独立和显著变量。使用选定的变量,我们创建了一个评分公式,对结直肠肝转移患者进行分类,以选择肝切除术的良好候选人。结果:多因素分析,即Cox回归分析显示原发性肿瘤的浆膜浸润(P = 0.0720,危险比= 2.238);原发癌局部淋巴结转移,即Dukes' C (P = 0.0976,风险比= 2.311);肝转移多发结节(P = 0.0461,风险比= 2.365);肝转移瘤直径大于5 cm (P =0.0030,风险比= 4.277);可切除的肝外远处转移(P = 0.0080,危险比= 4.038)是肝切除术后生存不良的重要独立预后因素。利用这五个变量,我们创建了一个新的评分公式来对结直肠肝转移患者进行分类。最后,我们的新评分系统根据肝切除术后的长期预后将患者分为II组和I组。结论:我们的新评分系统对结直肠肝转移患者进行分类是简单和有用的术前选择好的肝切除术候选人。尽管许多研究报道了肝切除术对结直肠肝转移患者生存率的有益影响,但术前选择肝切除术的良好候选者仍然很困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases: proposal of criteria to select candidates for hepatic resection.

Background: Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.

Methods: Fifteen clinicopathological features, which were recognized only before or during surgery, were selected retrospectively in 81 consecutive patients in one hospital (Group I). These features were entered into a multivariate analysis to determine independent and significant variables affecting long-term prognosis after hepatectomy. Using selected variables, we created a scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases to select good candidates for hepatic resection. The usefulness of the new scoring system was examined in a series of 70 patients from another hospital (Group II).

Results: Multivariate analysis, i.e., Cox regression analysis, showed that serosa invasion of primary cancers (P = 0.0720, risk ratio = 2.238); local lymph node metastases of primary cancers, i.e., Dukes' C (P = 0.0976, risk ratio = 2.311); multiple nodules of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0461, risk ratio = 2.365); nodules of hepatic metastases greater than 5 cm in diameter (P =0.0030, risk ratio = 4.277); and resectable extrahepatic distant metastases (P = 0.0080, risk ratio = 4.038) were significant and independent prognostic factors for poor survival after hepatectomy. Using these five variables, we created a new scoring formula to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases. Finally, our new scoring system classified patients in Group II and Group I well, according to long-term outcomes after hepatic resection.

Conclusions: Our new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases is simple and useful in the preoperative selection of good candidates for hepatic resection. Although many studies have reported the beneficial effects of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases on survival rates, it is still difficult to preoperatively select good candidates for hepatectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: technique, indications and results. Laparoscopic major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: formidable challenge to standardization. Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Proceedings of a consensus meeting, April 2006, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcome of selective digestive decontamination and enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Protective effects of a hibernation-inducer on hepatocyte injury induced by hypothermic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1