根据新的结果报告,伦敦一家医院报告的结核病患者治疗成功率低的原因。

S J Conaty, S Dart, A C Hayward, M C Lipman
{"title":"根据新的结果报告,伦敦一家医院报告的结核病患者治疗成功率低的原因。","authors":"S J Conaty,&nbsp;S Dart,&nbsp;A C Hayward,&nbsp;M C Lipman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In January 2002 the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC) introduced outcome reporting for tuberculosis 12 months after start of treatment. To determine whether outcome could change with longer and more detailed follow up, we examined this at 12 months and two years for a cohort notified in 2000 at a central London hospital. At 12 months 61/94 (65%) notified patients had completed treatment, 10 (16%) had died, 11 (12%) were lost to follow up, six (6%) were transferred to another service in the UK, four (4%) were still on treatment, and treatment for one (1%) patient had been stopped. After a mean follow up of two years, 65 (69%) had completed treatment. In this London service with a high prevalence of HIV infection (at least 23%), low treatment success was due to deaths, transfers and losses to follow up. The last of these was often due to patients returning to their country of origin (7 of 11). Tuberculosis was the primary or contributing cause of death in at least 4/94 (4%) cases. Completion rates need to be interpreted with caution particularly in specialist units with highly mobile populations. This has implications for national targets as well as for models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 1","pages":"73-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasons for low reported treatment success in notified tuberculosis patients from a London hospital according to new outcome reporting.\",\"authors\":\"S J Conaty,&nbsp;S Dart,&nbsp;A C Hayward,&nbsp;M C Lipman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In January 2002 the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC) introduced outcome reporting for tuberculosis 12 months after start of treatment. To determine whether outcome could change with longer and more detailed follow up, we examined this at 12 months and two years for a cohort notified in 2000 at a central London hospital. At 12 months 61/94 (65%) notified patients had completed treatment, 10 (16%) had died, 11 (12%) were lost to follow up, six (6%) were transferred to another service in the UK, four (4%) were still on treatment, and treatment for one (1%) patient had been stopped. After a mean follow up of two years, 65 (69%) had completed treatment. In this London service with a high prevalence of HIV infection (at least 23%), low treatment success was due to deaths, transfers and losses to follow up. The last of these was often due to patients returning to their country of origin (7 of 11). Tuberculosis was the primary or contributing cause of death in at least 4/94 (4%) cases. Completion rates need to be interpreted with caution particularly in specialist units with highly mobile populations. This has implications for national targets as well as for models of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"73-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002年1月,传染病监测中心(CDSC)对开始治疗12个月后的结核病实行了结果报告制度。为了确定更长时间和更详细的随访是否会改变结果,我们对2000年在伦敦市中心一家医院通知的一个队列进行了12个月和2年的检查。12个月时,61/94(65%)患者完成治疗,10(16%)患者死亡,11(12%)患者失去随访,6(6%)患者转移到英国的另一个服务机构,4(4%)患者仍在接受治疗,1(1%)患者已停止治疗。平均随访2年后,65例(69%)完成了治疗。在这个艾滋病毒感染率很高(至少23%)的伦敦服务中,治疗成功率低是由于死亡、转移和失去随访。最后一个原因往往是患者返回原籍国(11例中有7例)。在至少4/94(4%)的病例中,结核病是主要或促成死亡的原因。完成率需要谨慎解释,特别是在高流动性人口的专科单位。这对国家目标和护理模式都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reasons for low reported treatment success in notified tuberculosis patients from a London hospital according to new outcome reporting.

In January 2002 the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (CDSC) introduced outcome reporting for tuberculosis 12 months after start of treatment. To determine whether outcome could change with longer and more detailed follow up, we examined this at 12 months and two years for a cohort notified in 2000 at a central London hospital. At 12 months 61/94 (65%) notified patients had completed treatment, 10 (16%) had died, 11 (12%) were lost to follow up, six (6%) were transferred to another service in the UK, four (4%) were still on treatment, and treatment for one (1%) patient had been stopped. After a mean follow up of two years, 65 (69%) had completed treatment. In this London service with a high prevalence of HIV infection (at least 23%), low treatment success was due to deaths, transfers and losses to follow up. The last of these was often due to patients returning to their country of origin (7 of 11). Tuberculosis was the primary or contributing cause of death in at least 4/94 (4%) cases. Completion rates need to be interpreted with caution particularly in specialist units with highly mobile populations. This has implications for national targets as well as for models of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What should we measure: infection or infection control? Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England. Surveillance of antenatal infections--HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in London. How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1