早产儿视网膜病变早期治疗的多中心试验:研究设计

Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group
{"title":"早产儿视网膜病变早期治疗的多中心试验:研究设计","authors":"Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) study was a randomized, prospective multicenter trial comparing the safety and efficacy of earlier vs. conventionally timed ablation of the peripheral retina for the management of moderate to severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Approximately 7000 infants with birth weights &lt;1251 g were screened at 26 centers over a 2-year period to achieve the sample size of 401 consented infants for the randomized trial. In order to minimize treatment of eyes with ROP that were likely to undergo spontaneous regression of the disease, a risk analysis model, RM-ROP2, was used to select for inclusion in the randomized trial only prethreshold eyes that had a high risk of an adverse outcome. The primary outcome measure was grating visual acuity measured by Teller acuity card testing conducted by masked testers in eyes randomized to earlier treatment vs. eyes randomized to conventional management when infants were 9 months post-term. Results were categorized into favorable (≥1.85 cycles/degree) vs. unfavorable (&lt;1.85 cycles/degree). The secondary outcome measure was retinal structure, assessed by ophthalmological examinations conducted at 6 and 9 months post-term. Here we describe a unique approach used in the ETROP study to select high-risk prethreshold ROP eyes for randomization and details about design of the study. Study results indicated that earlier intervention in selected high-risk prethreshold eyes results in improved vision in premature infants with ROP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 311-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.003","citationCount":"78","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter trial of early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: study design\",\"authors\":\"Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) study was a randomized, prospective multicenter trial comparing the safety and efficacy of earlier vs. conventionally timed ablation of the peripheral retina for the management of moderate to severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Approximately 7000 infants with birth weights &lt;1251 g were screened at 26 centers over a 2-year period to achieve the sample size of 401 consented infants for the randomized trial. In order to minimize treatment of eyes with ROP that were likely to undergo spontaneous regression of the disease, a risk analysis model, RM-ROP2, was used to select for inclusion in the randomized trial only prethreshold eyes that had a high risk of an adverse outcome. The primary outcome measure was grating visual acuity measured by Teller acuity card testing conducted by masked testers in eyes randomized to earlier treatment vs. eyes randomized to conventional management when infants were 9 months post-term. Results were categorized into favorable (≥1.85 cycles/degree) vs. unfavorable (&lt;1.85 cycles/degree). The secondary outcome measure was retinal structure, assessed by ophthalmological examinations conducted at 6 and 9 months post-term. Here we describe a unique approach used in the ETROP study to select high-risk prethreshold ROP eyes for randomization and details about design of the study. Study results indicated that earlier intervention in selected high-risk prethreshold eyes results in improved vision in premature infants with ROP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 311-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.003\",\"citationCount\":\"78\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Controlled clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245604000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

摘要

早产儿视网膜病变早期治疗(ETROP)研究是一项随机、前瞻性多中心试验,比较早期与常规时间外周视网膜消融治疗中度至重度早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的安全性和有效性。在2年的时间里,在26个中心对大约7000名出生体重为1251克的婴儿进行了筛选,以达到401名同意进行随机试验的婴儿的样本量。为了最大限度地减少对可能发生疾病自发消退的ROP眼睛的治疗,使用风险分析模型RM-ROP2,仅选择具有高风险不良结局的阈前眼睛纳入随机试验。主要结果测量是通过泰勒视力卡测试测量光栅视力,该测试由蒙面测试者在婴儿出生后9个月随机分配到早期治疗组和随机分配到常规治疗组的眼睛进行。结果分为有利(≥1.85周期/度)和不利(<1.85周期/度)。次要指标是视网膜结构,通过术后6个月和9个月的眼科检查进行评估。在这里,我们描述了在ETROP研究中使用的一种独特的方法来选择高风险的阈前ROP眼睛进行随机化和研究设计的细节。研究结果表明,选择高危的阈前眼进行早期干预可以改善早产儿ROP的视力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicenter trial of early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: study design

The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) study was a randomized, prospective multicenter trial comparing the safety and efficacy of earlier vs. conventionally timed ablation of the peripheral retina for the management of moderate to severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Approximately 7000 infants with birth weights <1251 g were screened at 26 centers over a 2-year period to achieve the sample size of 401 consented infants for the randomized trial. In order to minimize treatment of eyes with ROP that were likely to undergo spontaneous regression of the disease, a risk analysis model, RM-ROP2, was used to select for inclusion in the randomized trial only prethreshold eyes that had a high risk of an adverse outcome. The primary outcome measure was grating visual acuity measured by Teller acuity card testing conducted by masked testers in eyes randomized to earlier treatment vs. eyes randomized to conventional management when infants were 9 months post-term. Results were categorized into favorable (≥1.85 cycles/degree) vs. unfavorable (<1.85 cycles/degree). The secondary outcome measure was retinal structure, assessed by ophthalmological examinations conducted at 6 and 9 months post-term. Here we describe a unique approach used in the ETROP study to select high-risk prethreshold ROP eyes for randomization and details about design of the study. Study results indicated that earlier intervention in selected high-risk prethreshold eyes results in improved vision in premature infants with ROP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On the generation and ownership of alpha in medical studies Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels Geographic variability in patient characteristics, treatment and outcome in an international trial of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction Analyzing bronchodilation with emphasis on disease type, age and sex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1