印度各邦之间的医疗保健差距和穷人的财政负担。

Brijesh C Purohit
{"title":"印度各邦之间的医疗保健差距和穷人的财政负担。","authors":"Brijesh C Purohit","doi":"10.1300/J045v18n03_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over five decades of independence, India has made rapid strides in various sectors. However, its performance in social sectors and particularly the healthcare sector has not been too rosy. Being the State's responsibility the healthcare has traditionally been influenced by individual State's budgetary allocation. Consequently inter-state disparity in availability and utilization of health services and health manpower are distinctly marked. This has implications for achievement of Health for All for the nation as a whole. Keeping in view the significance of studying inter-state variations in healthcare, this study focuses on the performance of healthcare sector in 15 major States in India. This is attempted through a comparative analysis of various parameters depicting availability of health services, their utilization and health outcomes. Our analysis depicts the prevalence of considerable inequity favoring high income group of States. In terms of healthcare resources, for instance, it indicates that the high income States hold a superior position in terms of: per capita government expenditure on medical and public health, total number of hospitals and dispensaries, per capita availability of beds in hospitals and dispensaries and health manpower in rural and urban areas. These parameters of availability have an impact on utilization levels and health outcomes in these States. A comparative profile of high and low income States as well as middle and low income States, both in rural and urban areas, reaffirms a greater financial burden in availing treatment at OPD and inpatient in low income States. In line with the higher financial burden and low per capita health expenditure, the health outcome indicators also depict a disconcerting situation in regard to low income States. These States are marked by lower life expectancy and higher incidence of diseases as well as high mortality rates. In this regard, demand as well as supply side constraints are observed which restrain the optimum utilization of existing health services. Among the low income States the main constraints on the demand side include illiteracy, malnutrition, and lack of infrastructure in accessing the facilities. Certain state specific supply side factors add significantly to under-utilization in low income States. In some of the States, however, corrective actions have been initiated to overcome the problem of the quality and low utilization of health facilities. In due course of time, it is likely that proper implementation of these measures may result in improved utilization level of existing health services, which may be useful to improve health status indicators. Nonetheless, overcoming the current levels of regional disparities in healthcare across three income groups of States may also require additional resources. The latter could be mobilized through assistance of donor agencies and appropriate mix of social and private insurance. Ultimately mitigating the problem of regional disparities in healthcare and protecting the poor and vulnerable from financial burden may require establishing and maintaining proper linkages between socio-economic development and healthcare planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"18 3","pages":"37-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v18n03_03","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-state disparities in health care and financial burden on the poor in India.\",\"authors\":\"Brijesh C Purohit\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J045v18n03_03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over five decades of independence, India has made rapid strides in various sectors. However, its performance in social sectors and particularly the healthcare sector has not been too rosy. Being the State's responsibility the healthcare has traditionally been influenced by individual State's budgetary allocation. Consequently inter-state disparity in availability and utilization of health services and health manpower are distinctly marked. This has implications for achievement of Health for All for the nation as a whole. Keeping in view the significance of studying inter-state variations in healthcare, this study focuses on the performance of healthcare sector in 15 major States in India. This is attempted through a comparative analysis of various parameters depicting availability of health services, their utilization and health outcomes. Our analysis depicts the prevalence of considerable inequity favoring high income group of States. In terms of healthcare resources, for instance, it indicates that the high income States hold a superior position in terms of: per capita government expenditure on medical and public health, total number of hospitals and dispensaries, per capita availability of beds in hospitals and dispensaries and health manpower in rural and urban areas. These parameters of availability have an impact on utilization levels and health outcomes in these States. A comparative profile of high and low income States as well as middle and low income States, both in rural and urban areas, reaffirms a greater financial burden in availing treatment at OPD and inpatient in low income States. In line with the higher financial burden and low per capita health expenditure, the health outcome indicators also depict a disconcerting situation in regard to low income States. These States are marked by lower life expectancy and higher incidence of diseases as well as high mortality rates. In this regard, demand as well as supply side constraints are observed which restrain the optimum utilization of existing health services. Among the low income States the main constraints on the demand side include illiteracy, malnutrition, and lack of infrastructure in accessing the facilities. Certain state specific supply side factors add significantly to under-utilization in low income States. In some of the States, however, corrective actions have been initiated to overcome the problem of the quality and low utilization of health facilities. In due course of time, it is likely that proper implementation of these measures may result in improved utilization level of existing health services, which may be useful to improve health status indicators. Nonetheless, overcoming the current levels of regional disparities in healthcare across three income groups of States may also require additional resources. The latter could be mobilized through assistance of donor agencies and appropriate mix of social and private insurance. Ultimately mitigating the problem of regional disparities in healthcare and protecting the poor and vulnerable from financial burden may require establishing and maintaining proper linkages between socio-economic development and healthcare planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"37-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v18n03_03\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v18n03_03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v18n03_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

独立50多年来,印度在各个领域取得了快速进步。然而,它在社会部门,特别是医疗保健部门的表现并不太乐观。保健是国家的责任,传统上受个别国家预算分配的影响。因此,国家间在提供和利用保健服务和保健人力方面的差距明显。这对实现全国人人享有卫生保健的目标具有影响。考虑到研究邦间医疗保健差异的重要性,本研究的重点是印度15个主要邦的医疗保健部门的表现。这是通过对描述保健服务的可得性、利用情况和健康结果的各种参数进行比较分析来实现的。我们的分析描述了有利于高收入国家群体的相当大的不平等现象的普遍存在。例如,在保健资源方面,报告表明高收入国家在以下方面处于优势地位:医疗和公共卫生方面的人均政府支出、医院和药房的总数、医院和药房的人均床位数以及农村和城市地区的保健人力。这些可得性参数对这些国家的利用水平和健康结果产生影响。高收入国家和低收入国家以及中等收入国家和低收入国家在农村和城市地区的比较情况再次表明,在门诊和住院治疗方面,低收入国家的财政负担更大。与较高的财政负担和较低的人均保健支出相一致,保健结果指标也描绘了低收入国家令人不安的情况。这些国家的特点是预期寿命较短,疾病发病率较高,死亡率也很高。在这方面,需求和供应方面的制约制约了现有保健服务的最佳利用。在低收入国家中,需求方面的主要制约因素包括文盲、营养不良和缺乏使用这些设施的基础设施。某些国家特定的供应方面因素大大加剧了低收入国家的利用不足。然而,在一些国家,已经开始采取纠正行动,以克服保健设施的质量和利用率低的问题。在适当的时候,这些措施的适当实施可能会提高现有保健服务的利用水平,这可能有助于改善健康状况指标。尽管如此,要克服目前国家三个收入群体在保健方面的区域差距,可能还需要额外的资源。后者可以通过捐助机构的援助和适当混合社会保险和私人保险来调动。要最终减轻保健方面的区域差异问题并保护穷人和弱势群体免受财政负担,可能需要在社会经济发展和保健规划之间建立和保持适当的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-state disparities in health care and financial burden on the poor in India.

Over five decades of independence, India has made rapid strides in various sectors. However, its performance in social sectors and particularly the healthcare sector has not been too rosy. Being the State's responsibility the healthcare has traditionally been influenced by individual State's budgetary allocation. Consequently inter-state disparity in availability and utilization of health services and health manpower are distinctly marked. This has implications for achievement of Health for All for the nation as a whole. Keeping in view the significance of studying inter-state variations in healthcare, this study focuses on the performance of healthcare sector in 15 major States in India. This is attempted through a comparative analysis of various parameters depicting availability of health services, their utilization and health outcomes. Our analysis depicts the prevalence of considerable inequity favoring high income group of States. In terms of healthcare resources, for instance, it indicates that the high income States hold a superior position in terms of: per capita government expenditure on medical and public health, total number of hospitals and dispensaries, per capita availability of beds in hospitals and dispensaries and health manpower in rural and urban areas. These parameters of availability have an impact on utilization levels and health outcomes in these States. A comparative profile of high and low income States as well as middle and low income States, both in rural and urban areas, reaffirms a greater financial burden in availing treatment at OPD and inpatient in low income States. In line with the higher financial burden and low per capita health expenditure, the health outcome indicators also depict a disconcerting situation in regard to low income States. These States are marked by lower life expectancy and higher incidence of diseases as well as high mortality rates. In this regard, demand as well as supply side constraints are observed which restrain the optimum utilization of existing health services. Among the low income States the main constraints on the demand side include illiteracy, malnutrition, and lack of infrastructure in accessing the facilities. Certain state specific supply side factors add significantly to under-utilization in low income States. In some of the States, however, corrective actions have been initiated to overcome the problem of the quality and low utilization of health facilities. In due course of time, it is likely that proper implementation of these measures may result in improved utilization level of existing health services, which may be useful to improve health status indicators. Nonetheless, overcoming the current levels of regional disparities in healthcare across three income groups of States may also require additional resources. The latter could be mobilized through assistance of donor agencies and appropriate mix of social and private insurance. Ultimately mitigating the problem of regional disparities in healthcare and protecting the poor and vulnerable from financial burden may require establishing and maintaining proper linkages between socio-economic development and healthcare planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1