{"title":"消除强化延迟对人类因果学习的影响。","authors":"Marc J Buehner, Jon May","doi":"10.1080/02724990344000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Associative learning theory postulates two main determinants for human causal learning: contingency and contiguity. In line with such an account, participants in Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson (1989) failed to discover causal relations involving delays of more than two seconds. More recent research has shown that the impact of contiguity and delay is mediated by prior knowledge about the timeframe of the causal relation in question. Buehner and May (2002, 2003) demonstrated that the detrimental effect of delay can be significantly reduced if reasoners are aware of potential delays. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the negative influence of delay can be abolished completely by a subtle change in the experimental instructions. Temporal contiguity is thus not essential for human causal learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":77438,"journal":{"name":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","volume":"57 2","pages":"179-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02724990344000123","citationCount":"76","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning.\",\"authors\":\"Marc J Buehner, Jon May\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02724990344000123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Associative learning theory postulates two main determinants for human causal learning: contingency and contiguity. In line with such an account, participants in Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson (1989) failed to discover causal relations involving delays of more than two seconds. More recent research has shown that the impact of contiguity and delay is mediated by prior knowledge about the timeframe of the causal relation in question. Buehner and May (2002, 2003) demonstrated that the detrimental effect of delay can be significantly reduced if reasoners are aware of potential delays. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the negative influence of delay can be abolished completely by a subtle change in the experimental instructions. Temporal contiguity is thus not essential for human causal learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"179-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02724990344000123\",\"citationCount\":\"76\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990344000123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02724990344000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76
摘要
联想学习理论假定人类因果学习的两个主要决定因素:偶然性和邻近性。Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson(1989)的参与者未能发现涉及超过两秒的延迟的因果关系。最近的研究表明,连续性和延迟的影响是由有关因果关系的时间框架的先验知识介导的。Buehner和May(2002,2003)证明,如果推理者意识到潜在的延迟,延迟的有害影响可以显著减少。在这里,我们首次证明延迟的负面影响可以通过实验指令的细微变化完全消除。因此,对于人类的因果学习来说,时间连续性并不是必要的。
Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning.
Associative learning theory postulates two main determinants for human causal learning: contingency and contiguity. In line with such an account, participants in Shanks, Pearson, and Dickinson (1989) failed to discover causal relations involving delays of more than two seconds. More recent research has shown that the impact of contiguity and delay is mediated by prior knowledge about the timeframe of the causal relation in question. Buehner and May (2002, 2003) demonstrated that the detrimental effect of delay can be significantly reduced if reasoners are aware of potential delays. Here we demonstrate for the first time that the negative influence of delay can be abolished completely by a subtle change in the experimental instructions. Temporal contiguity is thus not essential for human causal learning.