腹腔镜胆囊切除术中手术胆管造影和转换对减少主要胆管损伤的作用。

Ezio Caratozzolo, Marco Massani, Alfonso Recordare, Luca Bonariol, Michele Antoniutti, Alessandro Jelmoni, Nicoló Bassi
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中手术胆管造影和转换对减少主要胆管损伤的作用。","authors":"Ezio Caratozzolo,&nbsp;Marco Massani,&nbsp;Alfonso Recordare,&nbsp;Luca Bonariol,&nbsp;Michele Antoniutti,&nbsp;Alessandro Jelmoni,&nbsp;Nicoló Bassi","doi":"10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>We evaluated the role of operative cholangiography and of conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report 1074 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, out of a total of 1195 patients who underwent laparoscopy, over an 8-year period. The planned laparoscopic operative procedure in all the patients was the standard four-port technique with the operator on the left side of the patient. Operative cholangiography was performed with Olsen's pliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed 993 (83%) operative cholangiographies; 121 (10.1%) patients were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Despite a prolonged time of dissection, 54 (4.5%) patients were converted because of unclear anatomy of Calot's triangle. One hundred and ninety patients suffered acute cholecystitis and, of those, 52 (27.3% of 190 patients) were converted. Fifteen patients showed intraoperative biliary duct stones and they were converted. Seven (0.58%) bile duct injuries (one stricture and six fistulas) are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low number of major bile duct injuries reported in our study showed the value of operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, another important factor found to reduce major bile duct injuries was conversion when, despite accurate dissection, the anatomy of Calot's triangle remained unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":15992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"171-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of both operative cholangiography and conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Ezio Caratozzolo,&nbsp;Marco Massani,&nbsp;Alfonso Recordare,&nbsp;Luca Bonariol,&nbsp;Michele Antoniutti,&nbsp;Alessandro Jelmoni,&nbsp;Nicoló Bassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>We evaluated the role of operative cholangiography and of conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report 1074 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, out of a total of 1195 patients who underwent laparoscopy, over an 8-year period. The planned laparoscopic operative procedure in all the patients was the standard four-port technique with the operator on the left side of the patient. Operative cholangiography was performed with Olsen's pliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed 993 (83%) operative cholangiographies; 121 (10.1%) patients were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Despite a prolonged time of dissection, 54 (4.5%) patients were converted because of unclear anatomy of Calot's triangle. One hundred and ninety patients suffered acute cholecystitis and, of those, 52 (27.3% of 190 patients) were converted. Fifteen patients showed intraoperative biliary duct stones and they were converted. Seven (0.58%) bile duct injuries (one stricture and six fistulas) are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low number of major bile duct injuries reported in our study showed the value of operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, another important factor found to reduce major bile duct injuries was conversion when, despite accurate dissection, the anatomy of Calot's triangle remained unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"171-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-003-0884-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景/目的:我们评估手术胆管造影和转换术在减少主要胆管损伤中的作用。方法:我们报告了1074例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者,总共1195例接受腹腔镜手术的患者,超过8年。所有患者计划的腹腔镜手术程序均为标准的四孔技术,术者位于患者左侧。术中胆管造影采用Olsen氏钳子。结果:共行993例(83%)手术胆道造影;121例(10.1%)患者由腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术。尽管解剖时间较长,但仍有54例(4.5%)患者因不清楚Calot三角区解剖结构而转换。190例患者发生急性胆囊炎,其中52例(190例患者中的27.3%)转化为急性胆囊炎。术中出现胆管结石15例,均行胆管结石转化。报告胆管损伤7例(0.58%)(1例狭窄,6例瘘管)。结论:本研究报告的大胆管损伤数量较少,表明手术胆管造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的价值。此外,另一个减少胆管损伤的重要因素是转换,尽管有准确的解剖,但Calot三角的解剖结构仍然不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usefulness of both operative cholangiography and conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Background/purpose: We evaluated the role of operative cholangiography and of conversion to decrease major bile duct injuries.

Methods: We report 1074 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, out of a total of 1195 patients who underwent laparoscopy, over an 8-year period. The planned laparoscopic operative procedure in all the patients was the standard four-port technique with the operator on the left side of the patient. Operative cholangiography was performed with Olsen's pliers.

Results: We performed 993 (83%) operative cholangiographies; 121 (10.1%) patients were converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Despite a prolonged time of dissection, 54 (4.5%) patients were converted because of unclear anatomy of Calot's triangle. One hundred and ninety patients suffered acute cholecystitis and, of those, 52 (27.3% of 190 patients) were converted. Fifteen patients showed intraoperative biliary duct stones and they were converted. Seven (0.58%) bile duct injuries (one stricture and six fistulas) are reported.

Conclusions: The low number of major bile duct injuries reported in our study showed the value of operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, another important factor found to reduce major bile duct injuries was conversion when, despite accurate dissection, the anatomy of Calot's triangle remained unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic-assisted limited liver resection: technique, indications and results. Laparoscopic major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: formidable challenge to standardization. Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. Proceedings of a consensus meeting, April 2006, Tokyo, Japan. Treatment outcome of selective digestive decontamination and enteral nutrition in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Protective effects of a hibernation-inducer on hepatocyte injury induced by hypothermic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1