Basri Amasyali, Sedat Kose, Kudret Aytemir, Nadir Barindik, Mutlu Saglam, Ayhan Kilic, Gulcan Abali, Atila Iyisoy, Hurkan Kursaklioglu, Ersoy Isik
{"title":"有二尖瓣环钙化的患者颈动脉粥样硬化是否比没有二尖瓣环钙化的患者更重要?","authors":"Basri Amasyali, Sedat Kose, Kudret Aytemir, Nadir Barindik, Mutlu Saglam, Ayhan Kilic, Gulcan Abali, Atila Iyisoy, Hurkan Kursaklioglu, Ersoy Isik","doi":"10.1536/jhj.45.603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been suggested that mitral annular calcification (MAC) may be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis. However, how the incidence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) are affected by the coexistence of carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) in patients with versus without MAC have not yet been studied. We studied 101 patients with echocardiographic MAC and 52 controls without MAC to investigate the clinical impact of CAS on the frequency and severity (defined as the number of obstructed vessels) of CAD in patients with MAC. Carotid Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on all patients before coronary angiography. In patients with both MAC and CAS, the incidences of CAD and multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessel or left main coronary artery disease) were significantly higher than in the control group with CAS alone (91% versus 68%, P = 0.008 and 76% versus 44%, P = 0.004, respectively). On the other hand, among study and control patients without CAS, although the frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher in patients with MAC, interestingly, the differences were not statistically significant (37% versus 58% and 15% versus 26%, respectively, P > 0.05 for both). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CAS (P < 0.001), MAC (P < 0.01) and, to a limited extent hypertension (P = 0.054), were independent predictors for the presence of CAD. In conclusion, the coexistence of CAS is more important in patients with MAC than in those without as it provides valuable information about the incidence and severity of underlying CAD. In cases with MAC but without CAS, MAC could be caused by factors other than atherosclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14717,"journal":{"name":"Japanese heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is carotid atherosclerosis more important in patients with mitral annular calcification than in those without?\",\"authors\":\"Basri Amasyali, Sedat Kose, Kudret Aytemir, Nadir Barindik, Mutlu Saglam, Ayhan Kilic, Gulcan Abali, Atila Iyisoy, Hurkan Kursaklioglu, Ersoy Isik\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/jhj.45.603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It has been suggested that mitral annular calcification (MAC) may be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis. However, how the incidence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) are affected by the coexistence of carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) in patients with versus without MAC have not yet been studied. We studied 101 patients with echocardiographic MAC and 52 controls without MAC to investigate the clinical impact of CAS on the frequency and severity (defined as the number of obstructed vessels) of CAD in patients with MAC. Carotid Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on all patients before coronary angiography. In patients with both MAC and CAS, the incidences of CAD and multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessel or left main coronary artery disease) were significantly higher than in the control group with CAS alone (91% versus 68%, P = 0.008 and 76% versus 44%, P = 0.004, respectively). On the other hand, among study and control patients without CAS, although the frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher in patients with MAC, interestingly, the differences were not statistically significant (37% versus 58% and 15% versus 26%, respectively, P > 0.05 for both). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CAS (P < 0.001), MAC (P < 0.01) and, to a limited extent hypertension (P = 0.054), were independent predictors for the presence of CAD. In conclusion, the coexistence of CAS is more important in patients with MAC than in those without as it provides valuable information about the incidence and severity of underlying CAD. In cases with MAC but without CAS, MAC could be caused by factors other than atherosclerosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese heart journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.45.603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is carotid atherosclerosis more important in patients with mitral annular calcification than in those without?
It has been suggested that mitral annular calcification (MAC) may be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis. However, how the incidence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) are affected by the coexistence of carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) in patients with versus without MAC have not yet been studied. We studied 101 patients with echocardiographic MAC and 52 controls without MAC to investigate the clinical impact of CAS on the frequency and severity (defined as the number of obstructed vessels) of CAD in patients with MAC. Carotid Doppler ultrasonographic examination was performed on all patients before coronary angiography. In patients with both MAC and CAS, the incidences of CAD and multivessel disease (> or = 2 vessel or left main coronary artery disease) were significantly higher than in the control group with CAS alone (91% versus 68%, P = 0.008 and 76% versus 44%, P = 0.004, respectively). On the other hand, among study and control patients without CAS, although the frequencies of CAD and multivessel disease were higher in patients with MAC, interestingly, the differences were not statistically significant (37% versus 58% and 15% versus 26%, respectively, P > 0.05 for both). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CAS (P < 0.001), MAC (P < 0.01) and, to a limited extent hypertension (P = 0.054), were independent predictors for the presence of CAD. In conclusion, the coexistence of CAS is more important in patients with MAC than in those without as it provides valuable information about the incidence and severity of underlying CAD. In cases with MAC but without CAS, MAC could be caused by factors other than atherosclerosis.