记忆和记忆的伦理:考虑残疾和生物技术。

New Zealand bioethics journal Pub Date : 2003-06-01
Jayne Clapton
{"title":"记忆和记忆的伦理:考虑残疾和生物技术。","authors":"Jayne Clapton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Encompassed within forecasts offered by proponents of biotechnology about cures and control of disease and disability, are also predictions of an enhanced society. However, if the citizenship of our society is to be 're-membered' in the future with processes of elimination being employed on some potential lives deemed not worth living, deep ethical scrutiny is required. Hence, this discussion contends that when considering ethical decisions impacting upon the membership of future societies, there also exists an imperative to seek insight and wisdom by looking to past actions. The experiences and narratives of many people with disability and their families attest to some of these past actions whereby agendas of elimination have been impaired by practices founded upon both moral and socio-political exclusion. When considering 're-membering' in this context, a deliberation upon the imperative to remember will utilise the proximal text of a conference venue to contend that ethical reflection in this biotechnological era must embrace a process of anamnesis of past practices, rather than the more common approach of amnesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":87199,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand bioethics journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics of re-membering and remembering: considering disability and biotechnology.\",\"authors\":\"Jayne Clapton\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Encompassed within forecasts offered by proponents of biotechnology about cures and control of disease and disability, are also predictions of an enhanced society. However, if the citizenship of our society is to be 're-membered' in the future with processes of elimination being employed on some potential lives deemed not worth living, deep ethical scrutiny is required. Hence, this discussion contends that when considering ethical decisions impacting upon the membership of future societies, there also exists an imperative to seek insight and wisdom by looking to past actions. The experiences and narratives of many people with disability and their families attest to some of these past actions whereby agendas of elimination have been impaired by practices founded upon both moral and socio-political exclusion. When considering 're-membering' in this context, a deliberation upon the imperative to remember will utilise the proximal text of a conference venue to contend that ethical reflection in this biotechnological era must embrace a process of anamnesis of past practices, rather than the more common approach of amnesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"21-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物技术的支持者提供的关于疾病和残疾的治疗和控制的预测中,也包含了对一个增强的社会的预测。然而,如果我们社会的公民身份在未来被“记住”,对一些被认为不值得活下去的潜在生命采用淘汰程序,就需要进行深入的伦理审查。因此,本讨论认为,在考虑影响未来社会成员的道德决定时,也有必要通过回顾过去的行为来寻求洞察力和智慧。许多残疾人及其家庭的经历和叙述证明了过去的一些行动,在这些行动中,基于道德和社会政治排斥的做法损害了消除议程。当在这种背景下考虑“记忆”时,对记忆的必要性的审议将利用会议地点的近文本来争辩说,在这个生物技术时代,伦理反思必须包含对过去实践的记忆过程,而不是更常见的失忆方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethics of re-membering and remembering: considering disability and biotechnology.

Encompassed within forecasts offered by proponents of biotechnology about cures and control of disease and disability, are also predictions of an enhanced society. However, if the citizenship of our society is to be 're-membered' in the future with processes of elimination being employed on some potential lives deemed not worth living, deep ethical scrutiny is required. Hence, this discussion contends that when considering ethical decisions impacting upon the membership of future societies, there also exists an imperative to seek insight and wisdom by looking to past actions. The experiences and narratives of many people with disability and their families attest to some of these past actions whereby agendas of elimination have been impaired by practices founded upon both moral and socio-political exclusion. When considering 're-membering' in this context, a deliberation upon the imperative to remember will utilise the proximal text of a conference venue to contend that ethical reflection in this biotechnological era must embrace a process of anamnesis of past practices, rather than the more common approach of amnesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In that case: Shane is a professional rugby player who has a contract with a Super 12 team. Response. New Zealand's ethics committees. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. Protection of health research participants in the United States: a review of two cases. Cytogeneticists' stories around the ethics and social consequences of their work: a New Zealand case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1