研究、伦理委员会和法律问题。

New Zealand bioethics journal Pub Date : 2003-10-01

Andrew Moore

{"title":"研究、伦理委员会和法律问题。","authors":"Andrew Moore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Who should be publicly authorised to consider legal issues in research? This paper argues that public policy should authorise ethics committees to consider legal issues about their own actions regarding particular research proposals; and that it should not authorise them to consider legal issues regarding the actions of their applicants, or the actions of third parties.","PeriodicalId":87199,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand bioethics journal","volume":"4 3","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research, ethics committees and legal issues.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Moore\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Who should be publicly authorised to consider legal issues in research? This paper argues that public policy should authorise ethics committees to consider legal issues about their own actions regarding particular research proposals; and that it should not authorise them to consider legal issues regarding the actions of their applicants, or the actions of third parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"8-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand bioethics journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

谁应该被公开授权考虑研究中的法律问题?本文认为，公共政策应授权伦理委员会考虑有关其自身针对特定研究提案的行为的法律问题;它不应该授权他们考虑与申请人的行为有关的法律问题，或者第三方的行为。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Research, ethics committees and legal issues.

Who should be publicly authorised to consider legal issues in research? This paper argues that public policy should authorise ethics committees to consider legal issues about their own actions regarding particular research proposals; and that it should not authorise them to consider legal issues regarding the actions of their applicants, or the actions of third parties.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Zealand bioethics journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

In that case: Shane is a professional rugby player who has a contract with a Super 12 team. Response. New Zealand's ethics committees. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. Protection of health research participants in the United States: a review of two cases. Cytogeneticists' stories around the ethics and social consequences of their work: a New Zealand case study.