韦伯斯特诉生殖健康服务案后的堕胎立法:示范法规和评注。

Cumberland law review Pub Date : 1989-01-01

D M Smolin

{"title":"韦伯斯特诉生殖健康服务案后的堕胎立法:示范法规和评注。","authors":"D M Smolin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court's examination of abortion rights in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. The Article then proposes model statutes restricting abortion in light of the Webster decision. The Cumberland Law Review invites and encourages commentary on both sides of the issue.","PeriodicalId":81052,"journal":{"name":"Cumberland law review","volume":"20 1","pages":"71-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.\",\"authors\":\"D M Smolin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court's examination of abortion rights in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. The Article then proposes model statutes restricting abortion in light of the Webster decision. The Cumberland Law Review invites and encourages commentary on both sides of the issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cumberland law review\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"71-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cumberland law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumberland law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

以下文章分析了美国最高法院在韦伯斯特诉生殖健康服务案中对堕胎权的审查。然后，本文根据韦伯斯特案的判决提出了限制堕胎的示范法规。《坎伯兰法律评论》邀请并鼓励对这一问题的双方发表评论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.

The following Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court's examination of abortion rights in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. The Article then proposes model statutes restricting abortion in light of the Webster decision. The Cumberland Law Review invites and encourages commentary on both sides of the issue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cumberland law review

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

The Ethics of the Algorithm: Autonomous Systems and the Wrapper of Human Control Legal Theory from the Regulative Point of View Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future. Method, mediations, and the moral dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Catholic bioethics and the case of Terri Schiavo.