寡核苷酸序列的基因间相关性:归一化有多重要?

David L Gold, Jing Wang, Kevin R Coombes
{"title":"寡核苷酸序列的基因间相关性:归一化有多重要?","authors":"David L Gold,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Kevin R Coombes","doi":"10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Normalization is a standard low-level preprocessing procedure in microarray data analysis to minimize the systematic technological variations and produce more reliable results. A variety of normalization approaches have been introduced and are widely applied. Normalization, however, remains controversial. The sensitivity of array results to normalization is an open question. No clear standard for comparing or judging normalization methods has yet emerged, and the effects of normalization on gene-to-gene co-expression are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this investigation, we applied 1-, 2-, and N-quantile normalization to several publicly available microarray datasets quantified with either MAS 5.0 or dCHIP and evaluated the effect on gene-to-gene co-expression. We introduced a graphical method to explore trends in gene correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found clear differences in the distributions of gene dependencies by normalization method. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles in the normalization reduced trends in correlation by signal intensity in MAS 5.0 quantifications but not dCHIP. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles did not markedly reduce the correlation of known overlapping targets with MAS 5.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normalization plays a very important role in the estimation of inter-gene dependency. Caution should be used when making inferences concerning gene-wise dependencies with microarrays until this source of variation is better understood.</p>","PeriodicalId":72171,"journal":{"name":"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-gene correlation on oligonucleotide arrays: how much does normalization matter?\",\"authors\":\"David L Gold,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Kevin R Coombes\",\"doi\":\"10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Normalization is a standard low-level preprocessing procedure in microarray data analysis to minimize the systematic technological variations and produce more reliable results. A variety of normalization approaches have been introduced and are widely applied. Normalization, however, remains controversial. The sensitivity of array results to normalization is an open question. No clear standard for comparing or judging normalization methods has yet emerged, and the effects of normalization on gene-to-gene co-expression are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this investigation, we applied 1-, 2-, and N-quantile normalization to several publicly available microarray datasets quantified with either MAS 5.0 or dCHIP and evaluated the effect on gene-to-gene co-expression. We introduced a graphical method to explore trends in gene correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found clear differences in the distributions of gene dependencies by normalization method. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles in the normalization reduced trends in correlation by signal intensity in MAS 5.0 quantifications but not dCHIP. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles did not markedly reduce the correlation of known overlapping targets with MAS 5.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Normalization plays a very important role in the estimation of inter-gene dependency. Caution should be used when making inferences concerning gene-wise dependencies with microarrays until this source of variation is better understood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of pharmacogenomics : genomics-related research in drug development and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00129785-200505040-00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景和目的:归一化是微阵列数据分析中标准的低级预处理程序,以尽量减少系统技术变化并产生更可靠的结果。各种归一化方法已经被引入并被广泛应用。然而,正常化仍然存在争议。数组结果对归一化的敏感性是一个悬而未决的问题。目前还没有比较或判断归一化方法的明确标准,归一化对基因间共表达的影响也不清楚。方法:在本研究中,我们将1、2和n分位数归一化应用于几个公开可用的用MAS 5.0或dCHIP量化的微阵列数据集,并评估对基因-基因共表达的影响。我们介绍了一种图解的方法来探索基因相关的趋势。结果:通过归一化方法,我们发现基因依赖分布存在明显差异。在标准化中增加标准化分位数的数量会降低MAS 5.0量化中信号强度的相关性趋势,但不会降低dCHIP。增加标准化分位数的数量并没有显著降低已知重叠目标与MAS 5.0的相关性。结论:归一化在基因间依赖的估计中起着重要作用。在对微阵列的基因依赖性进行推断时,应该谨慎使用,直到这种变异的来源得到更好的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-gene correlation on oligonucleotide arrays: how much does normalization matter?

Background and objective: Normalization is a standard low-level preprocessing procedure in microarray data analysis to minimize the systematic technological variations and produce more reliable results. A variety of normalization approaches have been introduced and are widely applied. Normalization, however, remains controversial. The sensitivity of array results to normalization is an open question. No clear standard for comparing or judging normalization methods has yet emerged, and the effects of normalization on gene-to-gene co-expression are unclear.

Methods: In this investigation, we applied 1-, 2-, and N-quantile normalization to several publicly available microarray datasets quantified with either MAS 5.0 or dCHIP and evaluated the effect on gene-to-gene co-expression. We introduced a graphical method to explore trends in gene correlation.

Results: We found clear differences in the distributions of gene dependencies by normalization method. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles in the normalization reduced trends in correlation by signal intensity in MAS 5.0 quantifications but not dCHIP. Increasing the number of standardized quantiles did not markedly reduce the correlation of known overlapping targets with MAS 5.0.

Conclusions: Normalization plays a very important role in the estimation of inter-gene dependency. Caution should be used when making inferences concerning gene-wise dependencies with microarrays until this source of variation is better understood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards molecular medicine: a case for a biological periodic table. Genetic testing in Crohn disease: utility in individualizing patient management. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers of cancer drug response. The Autism Genome Project: goals and strategies. Oncogenes as novel targets for cancer therapy (part II): Intermediate signaling molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1