解决精神科护理中的压迫:关系伦理的观点。

Q3 Psychology Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2004-01-01
Wendy Austin, Vangie Bergum, Simon Nuttgens
{"title":"解决精神科护理中的压迫:关系伦理的观点。","authors":"Wendy Austin,&nbsp;Vangie Bergum,&nbsp;Simon Nuttgens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article we consider oppression in psychiatric care from a relational ethics perspective. We identify the vulnerability of psychiatric patients and the concomitant difficulties that confront medical health practitioners. We suggest that healthcare practitioners can become desensitized to systemic problems in the routine provision of care, that attention to protocols and procedural guidelines is not sufficient to reduce oppression in care, and that the discussion necessary to do so may not be generally supported within clinical environments. We conclude by proposing that the concept of fittingness may allow practitioners to recognize and resolve oppressive aspects of care in a better way and that a culture of questioning needs to be fostered within psychiatry care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":39734,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing oppression in psychiatric care: a relational ethics perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Austin,&nbsp;Vangie Bergum,&nbsp;Simon Nuttgens\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article we consider oppression in psychiatric care from a relational ethics perspective. We identify the vulnerability of psychiatric patients and the concomitant difficulties that confront medical health practitioners. We suggest that healthcare practitioners can become desensitized to systemic problems in the routine provision of care, that attention to protocols and procedural guidelines is not sufficient to reduce oppression in care, and that the discussion necessary to do so may not be generally supported within clinical environments. We conclude by proposing that the concept of fittingness may allow practitioners to recognize and resolve oppressive aspects of care in a better way and that a culture of questioning needs to be fostered within psychiatry care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们从关系伦理的角度来考虑精神科护理中的压迫。我们确定精神病患者的脆弱性和医疗保健从业人员所面临的伴随困难。我们认为,医疗从业者可能会对日常护理中的系统性问题变得不敏感,对协议和程序指南的关注不足以减少护理中的压迫,而且在临床环境中,这样做的必要讨论可能不会得到普遍支持。最后,我们提出,适应度的概念可以让从业者以更好的方式认识和解决护理的压迫性方面,在精神病学护理环境中需要培养一种质疑的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing oppression in psychiatric care: a relational ethics perspective.

In this article we consider oppression in psychiatric care from a relational ethics perspective. We identify the vulnerability of psychiatric patients and the concomitant difficulties that confront medical health practitioners. We suggest that healthcare practitioners can become desensitized to systemic problems in the routine provision of care, that attention to protocols and procedural guidelines is not sufficient to reduce oppression in care, and that the discussion necessary to do so may not be generally supported within clinical environments. We conclude by proposing that the concept of fittingness may allow practitioners to recognize and resolve oppressive aspects of care in a better way and that a culture of questioning needs to be fostered within psychiatry care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry
Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Visit Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry Online on IngentaConnect to view tables of contents or to subscribe. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry (EHPP) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research reports, reviews, essays, book reviews, commentaries, and case reports examining all the ramifications of the idea that emotional distress is due to an underlying organic disease that is best treated with pharmacological therapy. This oversimplified view of human nature permeates virtually every area of our society including medicine, business, law, education, politics, and the media. Thus, we welcome submissions from a broad range of specialties. EHPP is the official publication of the International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (ICSPP).
期刊最新文献
Redefining Anorexia Nervosa and Its Causes to Rethink Its Care The Neuroscientist’s Illusion An Antidote to the Pathologizing of Grief: Applying the Power–Threat–Meaning Framework Addressing the Quandary of Chronic Pain: Learning From Phenomenological Research Truth-Telling, Aging, and Healing From Institutional Psychiatric Violence: A Life Story and Mad Studies Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1