Robert N Swanson, Alberto Lainez-Ventosilla, Maria C De Salvo, Michael W Dunne, Guy W Amsden
{"title":"慢性支气管炎急性加重期每日一次阿奇霉素治疗3天,克拉霉素治疗10天:一项多中心、双盲、随机研究。","authors":"Robert N Swanson, Alberto Lainez-Ventosilla, Maria C De Salvo, Michael W Dunne, Guy W Amsden","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Randomization 1 : 1 to azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21-24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10-12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500 mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"31-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Once-daily azithromycin for 3 days compared with clarithromycin for 10 days for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Robert N Swanson, Alberto Lainez-Ventosilla, Maria C De Salvo, Michael W Dunne, Guy W Amsden\",\"doi\":\"10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Randomization 1 : 1 to azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21-24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10-12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500 mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"31-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200504010-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
摘要
研究目的:比较口服阿奇霉素500 mg每日1次,连用3天与口服克拉霉素500 mg每日2次,连用10天的疗效和安全性。设计:随机、双盲、双假人、多中心研究。环境:分布在8个国家(阿根廷、巴西、加拿大、智利、哥斯达黎加、印度、南非和美国)的76个研究中心。患者:322例慢性支气管炎(AECB)急性加重的成年门诊患者,记录为咳嗽或痰量增加,呼吸困难加重,脓性痰产生。干预措施:1∶1随机分组至阿奇霉素500毫克每日1次,连续3天或克拉霉素500毫克每日2次,连续10天。结果:主要疗效终点为第21-24天的临床反应,或改良意向治疗(MITT)分析中的治愈测试(TOC)访问(n = 318例患者)。在两个治疗组中,MITT患者的TOC临床治愈率相等,阿奇霉素组为85%,克拉霉素组为82% (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%)。第10-12天的临床成功率阿奇霉素组为93%,克拉霉素组为94% (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%)。两个治疗组对流感嗜血杆菌TOC的临床治愈率相当(阿奇霉素为85.7%;克拉霉素,87.5%)、卡他莫拉菌(分别为91.7%和80.0%)和肺炎链球菌(分别为90.6%和77.8%)。阿奇霉素和克拉霉素治疗组在TOC下对肺炎链球菌(分别为90.6%和85.2%)、流感嗜血杆菌(分别为71.4%和81.3%)和卡他利分枝杆菌(分别为100%和86.7%)的细菌学成功率也相当。阿奇霉素组和克拉霉素组治疗相关不良事件的总体发生率相似(分别为20.9%和26.8%),最常见的是腹痛(分别为6.3%和6.1%)、腹泻(分别为4.4%和5.5%)和恶心(分别为4.4%和3.7%)。结论:成人AECB患者用阿奇霉素500 mg每日1次治疗3天,相当于用克拉霉素500 mg每日2次治疗10天。
Once-daily azithromycin for 3 days compared with clarithromycin for 10 days for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.
Study objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.
Setting: Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA).
Patients: Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production.
Interventions: Randomization 1 : 1 to azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days.
Results: The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21-24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10-12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively).
Conclusions: Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500 mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.