基于热稳定性的危险有机废物焚烧等级的全面评价。

B Dellinger, P H Taylor, C C Lee
{"title":"基于热稳定性的危险有机废物焚烧等级的全面评价。","authors":"B Dellinger,&nbsp;P H Taylor,&nbsp;C C Lee","doi":"10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The results of a full-scale evaluation of the thermal stability-based hazardous organic waste incinerability ranking are presented. Tests were conducted for a surrogate mixture consisting of sulfur hexafluoride, chlorobenzene, toluene, tetrachloroethene, methylene chloride, 2-chloropropene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane under nominal incinerator operating conditions. Based on median surrogate DREs, the results indicated that the pyrolytic ranking was statistically significant at the 90 percent confidence level while the oxidative ranking was statistically significant at the 97.5 percent confidence level. The heat of combustion ranking failed to give a statistically significant correlation at the 90 percent confidence level. The statistical success of the thermal stability rankings and statistical failure of the heat of combustion ranking suggest that chemical reaction kinetics controlled the relative emission rates of the surrogate compounds during these tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":79391,"journal":{"name":"Air & waste : journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":"43 2","pages":"203-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-scale evaluation of the thermal stability-based hazardous organic waste incinerability ranking.\",\"authors\":\"B Dellinger,&nbsp;P H Taylor,&nbsp;C C Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The results of a full-scale evaluation of the thermal stability-based hazardous organic waste incinerability ranking are presented. Tests were conducted for a surrogate mixture consisting of sulfur hexafluoride, chlorobenzene, toluene, tetrachloroethene, methylene chloride, 2-chloropropene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane under nominal incinerator operating conditions. Based on median surrogate DREs, the results indicated that the pyrolytic ranking was statistically significant at the 90 percent confidence level while the oxidative ranking was statistically significant at the 97.5 percent confidence level. The heat of combustion ranking failed to give a statistically significant correlation at the 90 percent confidence level. The statistical success of the thermal stability rankings and statistical failure of the heat of combustion ranking suggest that chemical reaction kinetics controlled the relative emission rates of the surrogate compounds during these tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air & waste : journal of the Air & Waste Management Association\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"203-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air & waste : journal of the Air & Waste Management Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air & waste : journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1073161x.1993.10467126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文给出了基于热稳定性的危险有机废物焚烧等级的全面评价结果。在标准焚化炉操作条件下,对由六氟化硫、氯苯、甲苯、四氯乙烯、二氯甲烷、2-氯丙烯和1,1,1-三氯乙烷组成的替代混合物进行了试验。基于中位替代DREs,结果表明热解排序在90%的置信水平上具有统计学意义,而氧化排序在97.5%的置信水平上具有统计学意义。在90%的置信水平上,燃烧热排名没有给出统计上显著的相关性。热稳定性排名的统计成功和燃烧热排名的统计失败表明,在这些测试中,化学反应动力学控制了替代化合物的相对排放率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Full-scale evaluation of the thermal stability-based hazardous organic waste incinerability ranking.

The results of a full-scale evaluation of the thermal stability-based hazardous organic waste incinerability ranking are presented. Tests were conducted for a surrogate mixture consisting of sulfur hexafluoride, chlorobenzene, toluene, tetrachloroethene, methylene chloride, 2-chloropropene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane under nominal incinerator operating conditions. Based on median surrogate DREs, the results indicated that the pyrolytic ranking was statistically significant at the 90 percent confidence level while the oxidative ranking was statistically significant at the 97.5 percent confidence level. The heat of combustion ranking failed to give a statistically significant correlation at the 90 percent confidence level. The statistical success of the thermal stability rankings and statistical failure of the heat of combustion ranking suggest that chemical reaction kinetics controlled the relative emission rates of the surrogate compounds during these tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of probabilistic methods to understand the conservatism in California's approach to assessing health risks posed by air contaminants. A new EVP chosen. The characterization of ozone exposures in rural West Virginia and Virginia. Remote sensing data and a potential model of vehicle exhaust emissions. Landfill gas effects on groundwater samples at a municipal solid waste facility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1