侵袭性A群链球菌病密切社区接触者管理临时英国指南

{"title":"侵袭性A群链球菌病密切社区接触者管理临时英国指南","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group A streptococci cause a wide range of illnesses from non-invasive disease such as pharyngitis to more severe invasive infections such as necrotising fasciitis. There remains uncertainty about the risk of invasive disease among close contacts of an index case of invasive disease and whether this risk warrants antibiotic prophylaxis. A 19-200 fold increased risk among household contacts has been reported in the literature. Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis regimens vary by country. A comprehensive literature review together with preliminary analysis of 2003 United Kingdom data from the strep-EURO programme informed the interim recommendations of an expert working group. The evidence base to formulate definitive guidance is weak. Risk calculations based on provisional UK data estimated that over 2,000 contacts would need to receive antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent a subsequent case of invasive group A streptococcal disease. The Working Group considered that currently available evidence did not warrant the routine administration of chemoprophylaxis to all close community contacts. More robust risk estimates will be derived from ongoing UK surveillance data to inform a review of this guidance in 2005.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 4","pages":"354-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interim UK guidelines for management of close community contacts of invasive group A streptococcal disease.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Group A streptococci cause a wide range of illnesses from non-invasive disease such as pharyngitis to more severe invasive infections such as necrotising fasciitis. There remains uncertainty about the risk of invasive disease among close contacts of an index case of invasive disease and whether this risk warrants antibiotic prophylaxis. A 19-200 fold increased risk among household contacts has been reported in the literature. Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis regimens vary by country. A comprehensive literature review together with preliminary analysis of 2003 United Kingdom data from the strep-EURO programme informed the interim recommendations of an expert working group. The evidence base to formulate definitive guidance is weak. Risk calculations based on provisional UK data estimated that over 2,000 contacts would need to receive antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent a subsequent case of invasive group A streptococcal disease. The Working Group considered that currently available evidence did not warrant the routine administration of chemoprophylaxis to all close community contacts. More robust risk estimates will be derived from ongoing UK surveillance data to inform a review of this guidance in 2005.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"354-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

A群链球菌可引起多种疾病,从咽炎等非侵入性疾病到坏死性筋膜炎等更严重的侵入性感染。侵袭性疾病指示病例的密切接触者之间的侵袭性疾病风险以及这种风险是否值得抗生素预防仍然存在不确定性。据文献报道,家庭接触者的风险增加19-200倍。抗生素预防方案的建议因国家而异。全面的文献综述以及对2003年英国链球菌- euro规划数据的初步分析为专家工作组的临时建议提供了依据。制定明确指导的证据基础薄弱。根据英国临时数据进行的风险计算估计,超过2000名接触者需要接受抗生素预防,以防止随后出现侵入性a组链球菌病病例。工作组认为,目前可获得的证据不足以保证对所有密切社区接触者进行常规化学预防。将从英国正在进行的监测数据中得出更可靠的风险估计,以便为2005年对本指南的审查提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interim UK guidelines for management of close community contacts of invasive group A streptococcal disease.

Group A streptococci cause a wide range of illnesses from non-invasive disease such as pharyngitis to more severe invasive infections such as necrotising fasciitis. There remains uncertainty about the risk of invasive disease among close contacts of an index case of invasive disease and whether this risk warrants antibiotic prophylaxis. A 19-200 fold increased risk among household contacts has been reported in the literature. Recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis regimens vary by country. A comprehensive literature review together with preliminary analysis of 2003 United Kingdom data from the strep-EURO programme informed the interim recommendations of an expert working group. The evidence base to formulate definitive guidance is weak. Risk calculations based on provisional UK data estimated that over 2,000 contacts would need to receive antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent a subsequent case of invasive group A streptococcal disease. The Working Group considered that currently available evidence did not warrant the routine administration of chemoprophylaxis to all close community contacts. More robust risk estimates will be derived from ongoing UK surveillance data to inform a review of this guidance in 2005.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What should we measure: infection or infection control? Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England. Surveillance of antenatal infections--HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in London. How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1