血清胱抑素C作为老年人肾功能的内源性标志物。

R Hojs, S Bevc, B Antolinc, M Gorenjak, L Puklavec
{"title":"血清胱抑素C作为老年人肾功能的内源性标志物。","authors":"R Hojs,&nbsp;S Bevc,&nbsp;B Antolinc,&nbsp;M Gorenjak,&nbsp;L Puklavec","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the main indicator of kidney function. In clinical practice the GFR is often estimated from serum creatinine. In the elderly, serum creatinine is notoriously unreliable as an estimator of GFR. Recently, serum cystatin C has been proposed as a new endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate. A total of 144 patients, aged more than 60 years (mean age 70.4 years), who had undergone 51CrEDTA clearance, were enrolled in our study. In each patient serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. The reciprocal of serum creatinine, the reciprocal of serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance (from Cockcroft and Gault formula) were calculated. Serum cystatin C was measured with the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method. The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 34.5+/-25.55 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine was 312+/-210 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 3.15 mg/l+/-1.62 mg/l. We found a significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, the reciprocal of serum creatinine and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C as well as with creatinine clearance. In comparison of the correlation coefficients we found that the correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum cystatin C was significantly better than that with serum creatinine (p < 0.05). The correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C was superior to that with the reciprocal of serum creatinine (p < 0.003) and calculated creatinine clearance (p < 0.003). Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a more reliable marker of GFR in the elderly than serum creatinine or creatinine clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"24 2-3","pages":"49-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"R Hojs,&nbsp;S Bevc,&nbsp;B Antolinc,&nbsp;M Gorenjak,&nbsp;L Puklavec\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the main indicator of kidney function. In clinical practice the GFR is often estimated from serum creatinine. In the elderly, serum creatinine is notoriously unreliable as an estimator of GFR. Recently, serum cystatin C has been proposed as a new endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate. A total of 144 patients, aged more than 60 years (mean age 70.4 years), who had undergone 51CrEDTA clearance, were enrolled in our study. In each patient serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. The reciprocal of serum creatinine, the reciprocal of serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance (from Cockcroft and Gault formula) were calculated. Serum cystatin C was measured with the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method. The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 34.5+/-25.55 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine was 312+/-210 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 3.15 mg/l+/-1.62 mg/l. We found a significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, the reciprocal of serum creatinine and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C as well as with creatinine clearance. In comparison of the correlation coefficients we found that the correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum cystatin C was significantly better than that with serum creatinine (p < 0.05). The correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C was superior to that with the reciprocal of serum creatinine (p < 0.003) and calculated creatinine clearance (p < 0.003). Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a more reliable marker of GFR in the elderly than serum creatinine or creatinine clearance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"volume\":\"24 2-3\",\"pages\":\"49-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate, GFR)是肾功能的主要指标。在临床实践中,GFR通常由血清肌酐来估计。在老年人中,血清肌酐作为GFR的估计是出了名的不可靠。最近,血清胱抑素C被认为是肾小球滤过率的一种新的内源性标志物。我们的研究共纳入144例患者,年龄大于60岁(平均70.4岁),接受了51次credta清除率。测定每位患者的血清肌酐和血清胱抑素C。计算血清肌酐、血清胱抑素C和肌酐清除率的倒数(采用Cockcroft和Gault公式)。采用颗粒增强免疫光度法测定血清胱抑素C。51CrEDTA平均清除率为34.5+/-25.55 ml/min/1.73 m2,平均血清肌酐为312+/-210微mol/l,平均血清胱抑素C为3.15 mg/l+/-1.62 mg/l。我们发现51CrEDTA清除率与血清肌酐、血清胱抑素C、血清肌酐和胱抑素C的倒数以及肌酐清除率之间存在显著相关性。对比相关系数发现51CrEDTA清除率与血清胱抑素C的相关性显著优于与血清肌酐的相关性(p < 0.05)。51CrEDTA清除率与血清胱抑素C倒数的相关性优于与血清肌酐倒数(p < 0.003)和计算肌酐清除率(p < 0.003)的相关性。我们的结果表明,血清胱抑素C比血清肌酐或肌酐清除率更可靠地标记老年人GFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in the elderly.

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the main indicator of kidney function. In clinical practice the GFR is often estimated from serum creatinine. In the elderly, serum creatinine is notoriously unreliable as an estimator of GFR. Recently, serum cystatin C has been proposed as a new endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate. A total of 144 patients, aged more than 60 years (mean age 70.4 years), who had undergone 51CrEDTA clearance, were enrolled in our study. In each patient serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. The reciprocal of serum creatinine, the reciprocal of serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance (from Cockcroft and Gault formula) were calculated. Serum cystatin C was measured with the particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method. The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 34.5+/-25.55 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine was 312+/-210 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 3.15 mg/l+/-1.62 mg/l. We found a significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, the reciprocal of serum creatinine and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C as well as with creatinine clearance. In comparison of the correlation coefficients we found that the correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum cystatin C was significantly better than that with serum creatinine (p < 0.05). The correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and the reciprocal of serum cystatin C was superior to that with the reciprocal of serum creatinine (p < 0.003) and calculated creatinine clearance (p < 0.003). Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a more reliable marker of GFR in the elderly than serum creatinine or creatinine clearance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Good Clinical Practice Multicenter study of hyaluronic acid obtained by biotechnology to evaluate clinical efficacy and safety in knee osteoarthritis. Early and late effect of infliximab on circulating dendritic cells phenotype in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Treatment with oral biphosphonates can increase the sensitivity of sestamibi radionuclide imaging in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Telmisartan has the strongest binding affinity to angiotensin II type 1 receptor: comparison with other angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1