北伦敦大学区医院脑膜炎球菌病的检测和通报审计。

M Ruddy, Y Drabu, P Lee, B C Patel
{"title":"北伦敦大学区医院脑膜炎球菌病的检测和通报审计。","authors":"M Ruddy,&nbsp;Y Drabu,&nbsp;P Lee,&nbsp;B C Patel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The microbiology department at a North London hospital audited notifications of suspected meningococcal disease in response to a reported high rate, which it suspected was due to over-reporting out of hours to public health specialists. All cases notified over a 14-month period were assessed with regards to time of reporting and subsequent microbiological confirmation. Of 36 notifications, 18 were confirmed as bacterial, mostly meningococcal meningitis. Of the four types of sample readily obtainable on admission (blood culture, ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA] blood sample, throat swab and acute serum) all were obtained in only two cases. The reporting was considered appropriate, reflecting the relatively high incidence of meningococcal disease (MD) within the local population. Further cases might perhaps have been laboratory confirmed had all samples been sent on admission. A single form requesting all four samples in suspected meningococcal disease cases is recommended. Informing public health specialists out of hours could be rationalised.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 4","pages":"331-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit of the detection and notification of meningococcal disease at a North London university district hospital.\",\"authors\":\"M Ruddy,&nbsp;Y Drabu,&nbsp;P Lee,&nbsp;B C Patel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The microbiology department at a North London hospital audited notifications of suspected meningococcal disease in response to a reported high rate, which it suspected was due to over-reporting out of hours to public health specialists. All cases notified over a 14-month period were assessed with regards to time of reporting and subsequent microbiological confirmation. Of 36 notifications, 18 were confirmed as bacterial, mostly meningococcal meningitis. Of the four types of sample readily obtainable on admission (blood culture, ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA] blood sample, throat swab and acute serum) all were obtained in only two cases. The reporting was considered appropriate, reflecting the relatively high incidence of meningococcal disease (MD) within the local population. Further cases might perhaps have been laboratory confirmed had all samples been sent on admission. A single form requesting all four samples in suspected meningococcal disease cases is recommended. Informing public health specialists out of hours could be rationalised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"331-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北伦敦一家医院的微生物科审计了疑似脑膜炎球菌病的通报,以应对报告的高发病率,它怀疑这是由于超时向公共卫生专家报告所致。对14个月内报告的所有病例进行了报告时间和随后的微生物学确认评估。在36宗呈报个案中,18宗确诊为细菌性脑膜炎,多数为脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎。入院时可获得的四种样本(血培养、乙二胺四乙酸[EDTA]血样、咽拭子和急性血清)中只有两例全部获得。报告被认为是适当的,反映了当地人口中脑膜炎球菌病(MD)的发病率相对较高。如果在入院时送出所有样本,可能会有更多病例得到实验室确认。在疑似脑膜炎球菌病病例中,建议填写一份单一表格,要求提供所有四份样本。在非工作时间通知公共卫生专家可以合理化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audit of the detection and notification of meningococcal disease at a North London university district hospital.

The microbiology department at a North London hospital audited notifications of suspected meningococcal disease in response to a reported high rate, which it suspected was due to over-reporting out of hours to public health specialists. All cases notified over a 14-month period were assessed with regards to time of reporting and subsequent microbiological confirmation. Of 36 notifications, 18 were confirmed as bacterial, mostly meningococcal meningitis. Of the four types of sample readily obtainable on admission (blood culture, ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA] blood sample, throat swab and acute serum) all were obtained in only two cases. The reporting was considered appropriate, reflecting the relatively high incidence of meningococcal disease (MD) within the local population. Further cases might perhaps have been laboratory confirmed had all samples been sent on admission. A single form requesting all four samples in suspected meningococcal disease cases is recommended. Informing public health specialists out of hours could be rationalised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What should we measure: infection or infection control? Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Evaluation of peer review of infection control arrangements for healthcare-associated infection in four acute care trusts in the East of England. Surveillance of antenatal infections--HIV, hepatitis B, syphilis and rubella susceptibility in London. How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1