ICS/福莫特罗在肺科医生临床实践中的哮喘管理:一项关于GINA策略的国际调查。

Álvaro A Cruz, Sara Barile, Elena Nudo, Laura Brogelli, Patricia Guller, Alberto Papi
{"title":"ICS/福莫特罗在肺科医生临床实践中的哮喘管理:一项关于GINA策略的国际调查。","authors":"Álvaro A Cruz,&nbsp;Sara Barile,&nbsp;Elena Nudo,&nbsp;Laura Brogelli,&nbsp;Patricia Guller,&nbsp;Alberto Papi","doi":"10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) alone is no longer recommended due to safety issues. Instead, the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Report recommends the use of the combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with the rapid/long-acting beta-2 agonist formoterol, although the use in steps 1 and 2 is still off-label in the EU and in many countries. It is important to understand clinicians' knowledge and opinions on the issue with the ultimate goal to encourage the implementation of the new approach in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an international survey, directed to pulmonologists interested in the management of patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported that SABA alone should not be used in GINA Step 1 asthma treatment. As-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol combination to patients in step 1, and as-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol as reliever therapy in any step were found to be of current use prescribed in their real-life settings. SABA alone was still prescribed to a proportion of patients, although the pulmonologists' opinion was that it should no longer be used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most specialists are up to date and understand the relevance of the changes in GINA reports from 2019. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of GINA novel management strategy is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8572,"journal":{"name":"Asthma research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICS/formoterol in the management of asthma in the clinical practice of pulmonologists: an international survey on GINA strategy.\",\"authors\":\"Álvaro A Cruz,&nbsp;Sara Barile,&nbsp;Elena Nudo,&nbsp;Laura Brogelli,&nbsp;Patricia Guller,&nbsp;Alberto Papi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) alone is no longer recommended due to safety issues. Instead, the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Report recommends the use of the combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with the rapid/long-acting beta-2 agonist formoterol, although the use in steps 1 and 2 is still off-label in the EU and in many countries. It is important to understand clinicians' knowledge and opinions on the issue with the ultimate goal to encourage the implementation of the new approach in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an international survey, directed to pulmonologists interested in the management of patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported that SABA alone should not be used in GINA Step 1 asthma treatment. As-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol combination to patients in step 1, and as-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol as reliever therapy in any step were found to be of current use prescribed in their real-life settings. SABA alone was still prescribed to a proportion of patients, although the pulmonologists' opinion was that it should no longer be used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most specialists are up to date and understand the relevance of the changes in GINA reports from 2019. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of GINA novel management strategy is still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asthma research and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asthma research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asthma research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40733-021-00067-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:由于安全性问题,不再推荐使用短效β -2激动剂(SABA)单独治疗。相反,目前的全球哮喘倡议(GINA)报告建议将吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)与快速/长效β -2激动剂福莫特罗联合使用,尽管在欧盟和许多国家,步骤1和2的使用仍属于标签外使用。重要的是要了解临床医生对这个问题的知识和意见,最终目标是鼓励在临床实践中实施新方法。方法:我们进行了一项国际调查,针对对哮喘患者管理感兴趣的肺病学家。结果:大多数参与者报告单独使用SABA不应用于GINA第1步哮喘治疗。在第1步中按需使用低剂量ICS/福莫特罗联合治疗,以及在任何步骤中按需使用低剂量ICS/福莫特罗作为缓解治疗,都被发现在他们的现实生活环境中是当前使用的。尽管肺科医生的意见是不应该再使用SABA,但仍有一部分患者单独使用SABA。结论:大多数专家都是最新的,并了解2019年GINA报告中变化的相关性。然而,GINA的新管理策略仍需推广和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICS/formoterol in the management of asthma in the clinical practice of pulmonologists: an international survey on GINA strategy.

Background: The treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) alone is no longer recommended due to safety issues. Instead, the current Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Report recommends the use of the combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with the rapid/long-acting beta-2 agonist formoterol, although the use in steps 1 and 2 is still off-label in the EU and in many countries. It is important to understand clinicians' knowledge and opinions on the issue with the ultimate goal to encourage the implementation of the new approach in clinical practice.

Methods: We performed an international survey, directed to pulmonologists interested in the management of patients with asthma.

Results: Most participants reported that SABA alone should not be used in GINA Step 1 asthma treatment. As-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol combination to patients in step 1, and as-needed low-dose ICS/formoterol as reliever therapy in any step were found to be of current use prescribed in their real-life settings. SABA alone was still prescribed to a proportion of patients, although the pulmonologists' opinion was that it should no longer be used.

Conclusions: Most specialists are up to date and understand the relevance of the changes in GINA reports from 2019. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of GINA novel management strategy is still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Asthma Research and Practice is the official publication of Interasma and publishes cutting edge basic, clinical and translational research in addition to hot topic reviews and debate articles relevant to asthma and related disorders (such as rhinitis, COPD overlapping syndrome, sinusitis). The journal has a specialized section which focusses on pediatric asthma research. Asthma Research and Practice aims to serve as an international platform for the dissemination of research of interest to pulmonologists, allergologists, primary care physicians and family doctors, ENTs and other health care providers interested in asthma, its mechanisms and comorbidities.
期刊最新文献
Psychological distress and associated factors among asthmatic patients in Southern, Ethiopia, 2021. Retrospective assessment of a collaborative digital asthma program for Medicaid-enrolled children in southwest Detroit: reductions in short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) medication use. Nonadherence to antiasthmatic medications and its predictors among asthmatic patients in public hospitals of Bahir Dar City, North West Ethiopia: using ASK-12 tool. The hen and the egg question in atopic dermatitis: allergy or eczema comes first. Medication regimen complexity and its impact on medication adherence and asthma control among patients with asthma in Ethiopian referral hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1