靶向DNA损伤应答通路激活人癌细胞STING先天免疫信号通路

IF 5.5 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY FEBS Journal Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-18 DOI:10.1111/febs.15747
Joanne Wayne, Teresa Brooks, Alexandra Landras, Andrew J Massey
{"title":"靶向DNA损伤应答通路激活人癌细胞STING先天免疫信号通路","authors":"Joanne Wayne,&nbsp;Teresa Brooks,&nbsp;Alexandra Landras,&nbsp;Andrew J Massey","doi":"10.1111/febs.15747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activating stimulator of interferon genes to turn immunologically refractive cold tumor hot is an exciting therapeutic approach to increase the clinical responsiveness of some human cancers to immune checkpoint inhibitors. DNA damaging drugs and PARP inhibitors are two types of agents that have demonstrated this potential. Inhibitors of Chk1 or Wee1 induce DNA damage in cancer cells in predominantly the S-phase population. Increased cytoplasmic single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) from this DNA damage resulted in increased tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylation in a range of cancer cell lines. However, despite robust increases in pTBK1, no downstream consequences of TBK1 phosphorylation were observed (namely no increase in pIRF3/7, interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-dependent gene expression or a type I IFN response). In combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy such as gemcitabine or camptothecin (CPT), Chk1 inhibition increased cytoplasmic dsDNA compared with the cytotoxic alone but attenuated the cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced increase in IRF1 protein and STAT1 phosphorylation through inhibition of nuclear RelB translocation. Despite increased cytoplasmic DNA and TBK1 activation, inhibition of Chk1, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein, or Wee1 failed to activate a type I IFN response. We discuss the potential underlying mechanisms for this lack of IRF-dependent gene response and how this might influence the clinical strategies of combining Chk1 or Wee1 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12261,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Journal","volume":"288 15","pages":"4507-4540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/febs.15747","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting DNA damage response pathways to activate the STING innate immune signaling pathway in human cancer cells.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Wayne,&nbsp;Teresa Brooks,&nbsp;Alexandra Landras,&nbsp;Andrew J Massey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/febs.15747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activating stimulator of interferon genes to turn immunologically refractive cold tumor hot is an exciting therapeutic approach to increase the clinical responsiveness of some human cancers to immune checkpoint inhibitors. DNA damaging drugs and PARP inhibitors are two types of agents that have demonstrated this potential. Inhibitors of Chk1 or Wee1 induce DNA damage in cancer cells in predominantly the S-phase population. Increased cytoplasmic single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) from this DNA damage resulted in increased tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylation in a range of cancer cell lines. However, despite robust increases in pTBK1, no downstream consequences of TBK1 phosphorylation were observed (namely no increase in pIRF3/7, interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-dependent gene expression or a type I IFN response). In combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy such as gemcitabine or camptothecin (CPT), Chk1 inhibition increased cytoplasmic dsDNA compared with the cytotoxic alone but attenuated the cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced increase in IRF1 protein and STAT1 phosphorylation through inhibition of nuclear RelB translocation. Despite increased cytoplasmic DNA and TBK1 activation, inhibition of Chk1, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein, or Wee1 failed to activate a type I IFN response. We discuss the potential underlying mechanisms for this lack of IRF-dependent gene response and how this might influence the clinical strategies of combining Chk1 or Wee1 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEBS Journal\",\"volume\":\"288 15\",\"pages\":\"4507-4540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/febs.15747\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEBS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15747\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

激活干扰素基因刺激因子使免疫屈光性冷肿瘤变热是一种令人兴奋的治疗方法,可以提高某些人类癌症对免疫检查点抑制剂的临床反应性。DNA损伤药物和PARP抑制剂是两种已经显示出这种潜力的药物。Chk1或Wee1抑制剂主要在s期人群中诱导癌细胞DNA损伤。这种DNA损伤导致细胞质单链和双链DNA (dsDNA)增加,导致一系列癌细胞细胞系中坦克结合激酶1 (TBK1)磷酸化增加。然而,尽管pTBK1显著增加,但TBK1磷酸化没有下游后果(即pIRF3/7、干扰素调节因子(IRF)依赖性基因表达或I型IFN反应没有增加)。与细胞毒性化疗(如吉西他滨或喜树碱(CPT))联合使用时,与单独使用细胞毒性化疗相比,Chk1抑制增加了细胞质dsDNA,但通过抑制核RelB易位减弱了细胞毒性化疗诱导的IRF1蛋白和STAT1磷酸化的增加。尽管胞质DNA和TBK1激活增加,抑制Chk1、共济失调毛细血管扩张和rad3相关蛋白或Wee1未能激活I型IFN反应。我们讨论了这种缺乏irf依赖性基因反应的潜在潜在机制,以及这可能如何影响Chk1或Wee1抑制剂与免疫检查点抑制剂联合使用的临床策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Targeting DNA damage response pathways to activate the STING innate immune signaling pathway in human cancer cells.

Activating stimulator of interferon genes to turn immunologically refractive cold tumor hot is an exciting therapeutic approach to increase the clinical responsiveness of some human cancers to immune checkpoint inhibitors. DNA damaging drugs and PARP inhibitors are two types of agents that have demonstrated this potential. Inhibitors of Chk1 or Wee1 induce DNA damage in cancer cells in predominantly the S-phase population. Increased cytoplasmic single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) from this DNA damage resulted in increased tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) phosphorylation in a range of cancer cell lines. However, despite robust increases in pTBK1, no downstream consequences of TBK1 phosphorylation were observed (namely no increase in pIRF3/7, interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-dependent gene expression or a type I IFN response). In combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy such as gemcitabine or camptothecin (CPT), Chk1 inhibition increased cytoplasmic dsDNA compared with the cytotoxic alone but attenuated the cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced increase in IRF1 protein and STAT1 phosphorylation through inhibition of nuclear RelB translocation. Despite increased cytoplasmic DNA and TBK1 activation, inhibition of Chk1, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein, or Wee1 failed to activate a type I IFN response. We discuss the potential underlying mechanisms for this lack of IRF-dependent gene response and how this might influence the clinical strategies of combining Chk1 or Wee1 inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FEBS Journal
FEBS Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
375
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The FEBS Journal is an international journal devoted to the rapid publication of full-length papers covering a wide range of topics in any area of the molecular life sciences. The criteria for acceptance are originality and high quality research, which will provide novel perspectives in a specific area of research, and will be of interest to our broad readership. The journal does not accept papers that describe the expression of specific genes and proteins or test the effect of a drug or reagent, without presenting any biological significance. Papers describing bioinformatics, modelling or structural studies of specific systems or molecules should include experimental data.
期刊最新文献
Autophagy and tumorigenesis. Migrasome biogenesis and functions. Nuclear speckles: dynamic hubs of gene expression regulation. Molecular mechanisms and biological roles of GOMED. Autophagy in the retinal pigment epithelium: a new vision and future challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1