脑损伤:格鲁吉亚的保健能力和政策。

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-03 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1541
Eka Burkadze, Nino Chikhladze, George Lobzhanidze, Nino Chkhaberidze, Corinne Peek-Asa
{"title":"脑损伤:格鲁吉亚的保健能力和政策。","authors":"Eka Burkadze,&nbsp;Nino Chikhladze,&nbsp;George Lobzhanidze,&nbsp;Nino Chkhaberidze,&nbsp;Corinne Peek-Asa","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 90% of morbidity and mortality associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Lack of reliable, high-quality data regarding TBI prevention and care hinders the ability to reduce TBI burden. We sought to identify current TBI data collection practices and capacity in Georgia, focusing on pre-hospital, hospital, and rehabilitation treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The eight level I and two level II Trauma Hospitals in Georgia with the highest number of TBI admissions in 2017 were selected for study. A semi-structured survey about various aspects of TBI care was designed and semi-structured interviews of healthcare providers treating TBI patients (e.g. neurologists, neurosurgeons) were conducted based on this survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-hospital triage protocols were not routinely used to match patient treatment needs with hospital capacity. All hospitals provided specialist care for TBI 24 hours/day. MRI was available at only three (30%) centers, and in-hospital rehabilitation units were available in only one (10%). No center used a defined protocol for treating TBI patients and no national protocol exists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even among the largest, most highly specialized hospitals in Georgia, TBI care varies in terms of diagnostic and treatment protocols. While TBI specialists are available, diagnostic equipment often is not. Gaps in pre-hospital coordination and access to rehabilitation services exist and provide areas of focus for future investment in reducing TBI burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142337/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain injuries: health care capacity and policy in Georgia.\",\"authors\":\"Eka Burkadze,&nbsp;Nino Chikhladze,&nbsp;George Lobzhanidze,&nbsp;Nino Chkhaberidze,&nbsp;Corinne Peek-Asa\",\"doi\":\"10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 90% of morbidity and mortality associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Lack of reliable, high-quality data regarding TBI prevention and care hinders the ability to reduce TBI burden. We sought to identify current TBI data collection practices and capacity in Georgia, focusing on pre-hospital, hospital, and rehabilitation treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The eight level I and two level II Trauma Hospitals in Georgia with the highest number of TBI admissions in 2017 were selected for study. A semi-structured survey about various aspects of TBI care was designed and semi-structured interviews of healthcare providers treating TBI patients (e.g. neurologists, neurosurgeons) were conducted based on this survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-hospital triage protocols were not routinely used to match patient treatment needs with hospital capacity. All hospitals provided specialist care for TBI 24 hours/day. MRI was available at only three (30%) centers, and in-hospital rehabilitation units were available in only one (10%). No center used a defined protocol for treating TBI patients and no national protocol exists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even among the largest, most highly specialized hospitals in Georgia, TBI care varies in terms of diagnostic and treatment protocols. While TBI specialists are available, diagnostic equipment often is not. Gaps in pre-hospital coordination and access to rehabilitation services exist and provide areas of focus for future investment in reducing TBI burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142337/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i1.1541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:90%以上与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)相关的发病率和死亡率发生在低收入和中等收入国家。缺乏可靠、高质量的创伤性脑损伤预防和护理数据阻碍了减轻创伤性脑损伤负担的能力。我们试图确定格鲁吉亚目前的TBI数据收集实践和能力,重点是院前、医院和康复治疗。方法:选取2017年格鲁吉亚TBI住院人数最多的8家一级创伤医院和2家二级创伤医院进行研究。设计了一份关于TBI护理各方面的半结构化调查,并在此基础上对治疗TBI患者的医疗服务提供者(如神经科医生、神经外科医生)进行了半结构化访谈。结果:院前分诊方案没有常规使用,以匹配患者的治疗需要与医院的能力。所有医院每天24小时为创伤性脑损伤提供专科护理。只有三个(30%)中心提供MRI,只有一个(10%)中心提供住院康复单元。没有一个中心使用一个明确的方案来治疗TBI患者,也没有一个国家方案存在。结论:即使在格鲁吉亚最大、最专业化的医院中,TBI护理在诊断和治疗方案方面也各不相同。虽然有创伤性脑损伤专家,但通常没有诊断设备。在院前协调和获得康复服务方面存在差距,这为今后减少创伤性脑损伤负担的投资提供了重点领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brain injuries: health care capacity and policy in Georgia.

Background: Over 90% of morbidity and mortality associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs in low- and middle-income countries. Lack of reliable, high-quality data regarding TBI prevention and care hinders the ability to reduce TBI burden. We sought to identify current TBI data collection practices and capacity in Georgia, focusing on pre-hospital, hospital, and rehabilitation treatment.

Methods: The eight level I and two level II Trauma Hospitals in Georgia with the highest number of TBI admissions in 2017 were selected for study. A semi-structured survey about various aspects of TBI care was designed and semi-structured interviews of healthcare providers treating TBI patients (e.g. neurologists, neurosurgeons) were conducted based on this survey.

Results: Pre-hospital triage protocols were not routinely used to match patient treatment needs with hospital capacity. All hospitals provided specialist care for TBI 24 hours/day. MRI was available at only three (30%) centers, and in-hospital rehabilitation units were available in only one (10%). No center used a defined protocol for treating TBI patients and no national protocol exists.

Conclusions: Even among the largest, most highly specialized hospitals in Georgia, TBI care varies in terms of diagnostic and treatment protocols. While TBI specialists are available, diagnostic equipment often is not. Gaps in pre-hospital coordination and access to rehabilitation services exist and provide areas of focus for future investment in reducing TBI burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey on occupational injuries and related factors among emergency patients of Mashhad teaching hospitals over a year. Pediatric patients with facial fractures: a retrospective study. Pediatric trauma volume fell during the initial COVID-19 wave but rebounded to new highs for the remainder of 2020. Top journals publishing articles related to drowning prevention: a bibliometric analysis 2000-2022. Characterizing long-term outcomes following AMA discharges after assault-related penetrating trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1