音-音不匹配损害退化词的连续记忆。

Auditory perception & cognition Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-11 DOI:10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012
Adam K Bosen, Elizabeth Monzingo, Angela M AuBuchon
{"title":"音-音不匹配损害退化词的连续记忆。","authors":"Adam K Bosen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Monzingo,&nbsp;Angela M AuBuchon","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sequences of phonologically similar words are more difficult to remember than phonologically distinct sequences. This study investigated whether this difficulty arises in the acoustic similarity of auditory stimuli or in the corresponding phonological labels in memory. Participants reconstructed sequences of words which were degraded with a vocoder. We manipulated the phonological similarity of response options across two groups. One group was trained to map stimulus words onto phonologically similar response labels which matched the recorded word; the other group was trained to map words onto a set of plausible responses which were mismatched from the original recordings but were selected to have less phonological overlap. Participants trained on the matched responses were able to learn responses with less training and recall sequences more accurately than participants trained on the mismatched responses, even though the mismatched responses were more phonologically distinct from one another and participants were unaware of the mismatch. The relative difficulty of recalling items in the correct position was the same across both sets of response labels. Mismatched responses impaired recall accuracy across all positions except the final item in each list. These results are consistent with the idea that increased difficulty of mapping acoustic stimuli onto phonological forms impairs serial recall. Increased mapping difficulty could impair retention of memoranda and impede consolidation into phonological forms, which would impair recall in adverse listening conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words.\",\"authors\":\"Adam K Bosen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Monzingo,&nbsp;Angela M AuBuchon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sequences of phonologically similar words are more difficult to remember than phonologically distinct sequences. This study investigated whether this difficulty arises in the acoustic similarity of auditory stimuli or in the corresponding phonological labels in memory. Participants reconstructed sequences of words which were degraded with a vocoder. We manipulated the phonological similarity of response options across two groups. One group was trained to map stimulus words onto phonologically similar response labels which matched the recorded word; the other group was trained to map words onto a set of plausible responses which were mismatched from the original recordings but were selected to have less phonological overlap. Participants trained on the matched responses were able to learn responses with less training and recall sequences more accurately than participants trained on the mismatched responses, even though the mismatched responses were more phonologically distinct from one another and participants were unaware of the mismatch. The relative difficulty of recalling items in the correct position was the same across both sets of response labels. Mismatched responses impaired recall accuracy across all positions except the final item in each list. These results are consistent with the idea that increased difficulty of mapping acoustic stimuli onto phonological forms impairs serial recall. Increased mapping difficulty could impair retention of memoranda and impede consolidation into phonological forms, which would impair recall in adverse listening conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

音系相似的单词序列比音系不同的单词序列更难记忆。本研究探讨了这种困难是来自于听觉刺激的声学相似性,还是来自于记忆中相应的语音标签。参与者重建用声码器分解的单词序列。我们在两组中操纵了反应选项的音系相似性。一组被训练将刺激词映射到语音相似的反应标签上,这些标签与录制的单词相匹配;另一组被训练将单词映射到一组看似合理的反应上,这些反应与原始录音不匹配,但被选中的语音重叠较少。经过匹配反应训练的参与者比经过不匹配反应训练的参与者能够用更少的训练和更准确的回忆序列来学习反应,即使不匹配的反应在语音上彼此更不同,参与者也没有意识到不匹配。在两组反应标签中,回忆正确位置上的物品的相对难度是相同的。不匹配的回答会损害所有位置的回忆准确性,除了每个列表中的最后一个项目。这些结果与将声音刺激映射到语音形式的难度增加会损害序列回忆的观点一致。地图绘制难度的增加可能会损害记忆的保留,阻碍对语音形式的巩固,这将损害在不利听力条件下的回忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words.

Sequences of phonologically similar words are more difficult to remember than phonologically distinct sequences. This study investigated whether this difficulty arises in the acoustic similarity of auditory stimuli or in the corresponding phonological labels in memory. Participants reconstructed sequences of words which were degraded with a vocoder. We manipulated the phonological similarity of response options across two groups. One group was trained to map stimulus words onto phonologically similar response labels which matched the recorded word; the other group was trained to map words onto a set of plausible responses which were mismatched from the original recordings but were selected to have less phonological overlap. Participants trained on the matched responses were able to learn responses with less training and recall sequences more accurately than participants trained on the mismatched responses, even though the mismatched responses were more phonologically distinct from one another and participants were unaware of the mismatch. The relative difficulty of recalling items in the correct position was the same across both sets of response labels. Mismatched responses impaired recall accuracy across all positions except the final item in each list. These results are consistent with the idea that increased difficulty of mapping acoustic stimuli onto phonological forms impairs serial recall. Increased mapping difficulty could impair retention of memoranda and impede consolidation into phonological forms, which would impair recall in adverse listening conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of talker and accent variability on rapid adaptation and generalization to non-native accented speech in younger and older adults. Psychophysiological Markers of Auditory Distraction: A Scoping Review Temporal Summation for Noise Stimuli Neural Responses to Repeated Noise Structure in Sounds Are Invariant to Temporal Interruptions Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1