[7个耳塞真实还原(PAR)的实验测量]。

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia Pub Date : 2020-12-01
Filippo Cassano, Giovanni Maria Ferri, Ingrid Aloise, Nicola Mariano Manghisi, Francesco Cardascia, Vincenzo Gaccione, Michela Garavaglia, Graziano Labianca, Cosimo Mazzotta, Maria Teresa Minenna, Luigi Di Lorenzo
{"title":"[7个耳塞真实还原(PAR)的实验测量]。","authors":"Filippo Cassano,&nbsp;Giovanni Maria Ferri,&nbsp;Ingrid Aloise,&nbsp;Nicola Mariano Manghisi,&nbsp;Francesco Cardascia,&nbsp;Vincenzo Gaccione,&nbsp;Michela Garavaglia,&nbsp;Graziano Labianca,&nbsp;Cosimo Mazzotta,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Minenna,&nbsp;Luigi Di Lorenzo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate, through the use of the EA-RfitTM Validation System, the real reduction (PAR) for the right ear (AuD), for the left ear (AuS) and biaural reduction related to each of the seven earplugs currently produced by 3M. In addition, we wanted to verify any difference between the aforementioned PARs in consideration of the tendency to predominantly use the right hand (right-handed) or the left hand (left-handed) and in relation to gender. Finally, for each insert and for each subject, an audiometric examination was conducted with the insert worn, to compare the average PAR value obtained by the EA-RfitTM system for each of the seven inserts and for all selected subjects, with the determined abatement curve through the audiometric measurement of the hearing threshold with the insert worn. The use of the E-ARfitTM system for the choice of the ear insert leads to important advantages in the protection of all workers. Moldable acoustic PPE generally proved to be more efficient than non-moldable, so much so that the higher SNRs (provided by the manufacturer), especially when referring to non-moldable inserts, were found to be misleading as to the real personal abatement capacity of the inserts. The average audiometric curves, obtained with the different inserts worn, confirmed that all of them guarantee a higher reduction for high frequencies than for \"social\" ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Experimental measurement of the real reduction (PAR) of seven ear plugs].\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Cassano,&nbsp;Giovanni Maria Ferri,&nbsp;Ingrid Aloise,&nbsp;Nicola Mariano Manghisi,&nbsp;Francesco Cardascia,&nbsp;Vincenzo Gaccione,&nbsp;Michela Garavaglia,&nbsp;Graziano Labianca,&nbsp;Cosimo Mazzotta,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Minenna,&nbsp;Luigi Di Lorenzo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate, through the use of the EA-RfitTM Validation System, the real reduction (PAR) for the right ear (AuD), for the left ear (AuS) and biaural reduction related to each of the seven earplugs currently produced by 3M. In addition, we wanted to verify any difference between the aforementioned PARs in consideration of the tendency to predominantly use the right hand (right-handed) or the left hand (left-handed) and in relation to gender. Finally, for each insert and for each subject, an audiometric examination was conducted with the insert worn, to compare the average PAR value obtained by the EA-RfitTM system for each of the seven inserts and for all selected subjects, with the determined abatement curve through the audiometric measurement of the hearing threshold with the insert worn. The use of the E-ARfitTM system for the choice of the ear insert leads to important advantages in the protection of all workers. Moldable acoustic PPE generally proved to be more efficient than non-moldable, so much so that the higher SNRs (provided by the manufacturer), especially when referring to non-moldable inserts, were found to be misleading as to the real personal abatement capacity of the inserts. The average audiometric curves, obtained with the different inserts worn, confirmed that all of them guarantee a higher reduction for high frequencies than for \\\"social\\\" ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在通过使用EA-RfitTM验证系统,评估3M目前生产的7种耳塞的右耳实际降噪(PAR) (AuD)、左耳实际降噪(AuS)和生物降噪。此外,我们想要验证上述par在主要使用右手(右撇子)或左手(左撇子)的倾向以及性别方面的差异。最后,对每个植入物和每个受试者进行佩戴植入物的听力学检查,将EA-RfitTM系统获得的7个植入物和所有选定受试者的平均PAR值与佩戴植入物后听力学测量的听力阈值确定的衰减曲线进行比较。使用E-ARfitTM系统选择耳套,在保护所有工人方面具有重要优势。可模塑的隔音PPE通常被证明比不可模塑的更有效,以至于更高的信噪比(由制造商提供),特别是当涉及不可模塑插入时,被发现误导了插入的实际个人减少能力。使用不同的插入物获得的平均听力曲线证实,所有这些都保证了高频比“社交”频率更高的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Experimental measurement of the real reduction (PAR) of seven ear plugs].

Summary: The study aimed to evaluate, through the use of the EA-RfitTM Validation System, the real reduction (PAR) for the right ear (AuD), for the left ear (AuS) and biaural reduction related to each of the seven earplugs currently produced by 3M. In addition, we wanted to verify any difference between the aforementioned PARs in consideration of the tendency to predominantly use the right hand (right-handed) or the left hand (left-handed) and in relation to gender. Finally, for each insert and for each subject, an audiometric examination was conducted with the insert worn, to compare the average PAR value obtained by the EA-RfitTM system for each of the seven inserts and for all selected subjects, with the determined abatement curve through the audiometric measurement of the hearing threshold with the insert worn. The use of the E-ARfitTM system for the choice of the ear insert leads to important advantages in the protection of all workers. Moldable acoustic PPE generally proved to be more efficient than non-moldable, so much so that the higher SNRs (provided by the manufacturer), especially when referring to non-moldable inserts, were found to be misleading as to the real personal abatement capacity of the inserts. The average audiometric curves, obtained with the different inserts worn, confirmed that all of them guarantee a higher reduction for high frequencies than for "social" ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Needle stick injuries among nurses in Italy: a review. High altitude underground mining. Acclimatization and possible toxicological risks. Nitrous oxide occupational exposure in conscious sedation procedures in endoscopic ambulatories: a pilot retrospective observational study in an Italian hospital. [Self-compassion and secondary traumatization: results of an observational study carried out in Covid hospital ordinary units]. Background Music in elderly nursing home: a feasibility explorative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1