美国东南部老年人RHC医疗保险受益人的急诊使用情况。

Matt T Bagwell, Thomas T H Wan
{"title":"美国东南部老年人RHC医疗保险受益人的急诊使用情况。","authors":"Matt T Bagwell, Thomas T H Wan","doi":"10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study analyzed individual factors of race and dual eligibility on emergency room (ER) utilization of older adult Medicare patients treated by RHCs in CMS Region 4.\n\n\nMethodology/approach\nA prospective, longitudinal design was employed to analyze health disparities that potentially exist among RHC Medicare beneficiary patients (+65) in terms of ER use. The years of investigation were 2010 through 2012, using mixed multilevel, binary logistic regression.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that dual eligible RHC patients utilized ER services at higher rates than non-dual eligible, Medicare only RHC patients at: 77%, 80%, and 66%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively; and above the White reference group, Black RHC Medicare patients utilized ER services at higher rates of: 18%, 20%, and 34%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nRegarding limitations, cohort data observations within the window of 3 years were only analyzed; regarding generalizability, in different CMS regions, results will likely vary; and linking other variables together in the study was limited by the accessible data. Future research should consider these limitations, and attempt to refine. The findings support that dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, as a proxy measure of socio-economic status, and race continue to influence higher rates of ER utilization in CMS Region 4.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn terms of ER utilization disparities, persistently, as recent as 2012, Black, dual eligible RHC Medicare beneficiary patients age 65 and over may be twice as likely to utilize ER services for care than their counterparts in the Southeastern United States.","PeriodicalId":74681,"journal":{"name":"Research in the sociology of health care","volume":"38 ","pages":"49-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ER Use among Older Adult RHC Medicare Beneficiaries in the Southeastern United States.\",\"authors\":\"Matt T Bagwell, Thomas T H Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThis study analyzed individual factors of race and dual eligibility on emergency room (ER) utilization of older adult Medicare patients treated by RHCs in CMS Region 4.\\n\\n\\nMethodology/approach\\nA prospective, longitudinal design was employed to analyze health disparities that potentially exist among RHC Medicare beneficiary patients (+65) in terms of ER use. The years of investigation were 2010 through 2012, using mixed multilevel, binary logistic regression.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study found that dual eligible RHC patients utilized ER services at higher rates than non-dual eligible, Medicare only RHC patients at: 77%, 80%, and 66%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively; and above the White reference group, Black RHC Medicare patients utilized ER services at higher rates of: 18%, 20%, and 34%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nRegarding limitations, cohort data observations within the window of 3 years were only analyzed; regarding generalizability, in different CMS regions, results will likely vary; and linking other variables together in the study was limited by the accessible data. Future research should consider these limitations, and attempt to refine. The findings support that dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, as a proxy measure of socio-economic status, and race continue to influence higher rates of ER utilization in CMS Region 4.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nIn terms of ER utilization disparities, persistently, as recent as 2012, Black, dual eligible RHC Medicare beneficiary patients age 65 and over may be twice as likely to utilize ER services for care than their counterparts in the Southeastern United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in the sociology of health care\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"49-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in the sociology of health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in the sociology of health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究分析了种族和双重资格对CMS 4区RHCs治疗的老年医保患者急诊室(ER)利用的个体因素。方法/方法:采用前瞻性纵向设计来分析RHC医疗保险受益人(+65)在急诊室使用方面可能存在的健康差异。调查年份为2010年至2012年,采用混合多水平、二元逻辑回归。研究结果:本研究发现,2010年、2011年和2012年,双重资格的RHC患者使用急诊服务的比例分别高于非双重资格、仅医疗保险的RHC患者,分别为77%、80%和66%;在白人参照组之上,黑人RHC医保患者在2010年、2011年和2012年分别以18%、20%和34%的较高比率利用急诊服务。研究局限性/启示:关于局限性,仅分析了3年窗口内的队列数据观察;关于普遍性,在不同的CMS区域,结果可能会有所不同;在研究中将其他变量联系在一起受到可获得数据的限制。未来的研究应该考虑到这些局限性,并尝试改进。研究结果支持双重医疗保险和医疗补助资格,作为社会经济地位的代理措施,和种族继续影响CMS区域4较高的急诊室使用率。独创性/价值:就急诊室利用差异而言,持续存在,直到2012年,65岁及以上的黑人双重符合RHC医疗保险受益人患者使用急诊室服务的可能性是美国东南部同行的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ER Use among Older Adult RHC Medicare Beneficiaries in the Southeastern United States.
Purpose This study analyzed individual factors of race and dual eligibility on emergency room (ER) utilization of older adult Medicare patients treated by RHCs in CMS Region 4. Methodology/approach A prospective, longitudinal design was employed to analyze health disparities that potentially exist among RHC Medicare beneficiary patients (+65) in terms of ER use. The years of investigation were 2010 through 2012, using mixed multilevel, binary logistic regression. Findings This study found that dual eligible RHC patients utilized ER services at higher rates than non-dual eligible, Medicare only RHC patients at: 77%, 80%, and 66%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively; and above the White reference group, Black RHC Medicare patients utilized ER services at higher rates of: 18%, 20%, and 34%, in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Research limitations/implications Regarding limitations, cohort data observations within the window of 3 years were only analyzed; regarding generalizability, in different CMS regions, results will likely vary; and linking other variables together in the study was limited by the accessible data. Future research should consider these limitations, and attempt to refine. The findings support that dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, as a proxy measure of socio-economic status, and race continue to influence higher rates of ER utilization in CMS Region 4. Originality/value In terms of ER utilization disparities, persistently, as recent as 2012, Black, dual eligible RHC Medicare beneficiary patients age 65 and over may be twice as likely to utilize ER services for care than their counterparts in the Southeastern United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and Health Care Inequities, Infectious Diseases and Social Factors Trends in Health Disparities of Rural Latinos Pre- and Post-Accountable Care Organization Implementation. Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Other Social Characteristics as Factors in Health and Health Care Disparities Prelims Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1