军队卫生系统护助产士与医师分娩结局的比较。

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-20 DOI:10.1177/1527154421994071
Lynette Hamlin, Lindsay Grunwald, Rodney X Sturdivant, Tracey P Koehlmoos
{"title":"军队卫生系统护助产士与医师分娩结局的比较。","authors":"Lynette Hamlin,&nbsp;Lindsay Grunwald,&nbsp;Rodney X Sturdivant,&nbsp;Tracey P Koehlmoos","doi":"10.1177/1527154421994071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to identify the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of women cared for by Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs) versus physicians in the Military Health System (MHS) and compare birth outcomes between provider types. The MHS is one of America's largest and most complex health care systems. Using the Military Health System Data Repository, this retrospective study examined TRICARE beneficiaries who gave birth during 2012-2014. Analysis included frequency of patients by perinatal services, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analysis by provider type. To account for differences in patient and pregnancy risk, odds ratios were calculated for both high-risk and general risk population. There were 136,848 births from 2012 to 2014, and 30.8% were delivered by CNMs. Low-risk women whose births were attended by CNMs had lower odds of a cesarean birth, <i>induction</i>/augmentation of labor, complications of birth, postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and preterm birth and higher odds of a vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding than women whose births were attended by physicians. These results have implications for the composition of the women's health workforce. In the MHS, where CNMs work to the fullest scope of their authority, CNMs attended almost 4 times <i>more</i> births than our national average. An example to other U.S. systems and high-income countries, this study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that when CNMs practice to the fullest extent of their education, they provide quality health outcomes to more women.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":"22 2","pages":"105-113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1527154421994071","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nurse-Midwife and Physician Birth Outcomes in the Military Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Lynette Hamlin,&nbsp;Lindsay Grunwald,&nbsp;Rodney X Sturdivant,&nbsp;Tracey P Koehlmoos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1527154421994071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to identify the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of women cared for by Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs) versus physicians in the Military Health System (MHS) and compare birth outcomes between provider types. The MHS is one of America's largest and most complex health care systems. Using the Military Health System Data Repository, this retrospective study examined TRICARE beneficiaries who gave birth during 2012-2014. Analysis included frequency of patients by perinatal services, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analysis by provider type. To account for differences in patient and pregnancy risk, odds ratios were calculated for both high-risk and general risk population. There were 136,848 births from 2012 to 2014, and 30.8% were delivered by CNMs. Low-risk women whose births were attended by CNMs had lower odds of a cesarean birth, <i>induction</i>/augmentation of labor, complications of birth, postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and preterm birth and higher odds of a vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding than women whose births were attended by physicians. These results have implications for the composition of the women's health workforce. In the MHS, where CNMs work to the fullest scope of their authority, CNMs attended almost 4 times <i>more</i> births than our national average. An example to other U.S. systems and high-income countries, this study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that when CNMs practice to the fullest extent of their education, they provide quality health outcomes to more women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"105-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1527154421994071\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154421994071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154421994071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究的目的是确定由注册护士助产士(CNMs)与军事卫生系统(MHS)医生护理的妇女的社会经济和人口统计学特征,并比较提供者类型之间的分娩结果。MHS是美国最大、最复杂的医疗保健系统之一。利用军事卫生系统数据库,本回顾性研究调查了2012-2014年分娩的TRICARE受益人。分析包括围产儿服务的患者频率、描述性统计和按提供者类型进行的logistic回归分析。为了解释患者和妊娠风险的差异,计算了高风险人群和一般风险人群的优势比。2012年至2014年,共有136848名新生儿出生,其中30.8%是由CNMs分娩的。由助产士接生的低风险妇女发生剖宫产、引产/助产、分娩并发症、产后出血、子宫内膜炎和早产的几率较低,而阴道分娩、剖宫产后阴道分娩和母乳喂养的几率高于由医生接生的妇女。这些结果对妇女保健人力队伍的构成具有影响。在妇幼保健部门,助产士在其职权范围内发挥最大作用,助产士接生的新生儿数量几乎是全国平均水平的四倍。作为美国其他系统和高收入国家的一个例子,这项研究增加了越来越多的证据,表明当cnm在其教育的最大程度上实践时,他们为更多的妇女提供了高质量的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Nurse-Midwife and Physician Birth Outcomes in the Military Health System.

The purpose of this study is to identify the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of women cared for by Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs) versus physicians in the Military Health System (MHS) and compare birth outcomes between provider types. The MHS is one of America's largest and most complex health care systems. Using the Military Health System Data Repository, this retrospective study examined TRICARE beneficiaries who gave birth during 2012-2014. Analysis included frequency of patients by perinatal services, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analysis by provider type. To account for differences in patient and pregnancy risk, odds ratios were calculated for both high-risk and general risk population. There were 136,848 births from 2012 to 2014, and 30.8% were delivered by CNMs. Low-risk women whose births were attended by CNMs had lower odds of a cesarean birth, induction/augmentation of labor, complications of birth, postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and preterm birth and higher odds of a vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding than women whose births were attended by physicians. These results have implications for the composition of the women's health workforce. In the MHS, where CNMs work to the fullest scope of their authority, CNMs attended almost 4 times more births than our national average. An example to other U.S. systems and high-income countries, this study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that when CNMs practice to the fullest extent of their education, they provide quality health outcomes to more women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Motivations, Challenges, and Integration of Internationally Educated Healthcare Workers in the UK: A Scoping Review. Analysis of Ohio Nurses' Voting Behaviors 2020-2023. The "Right Kinds of Nurses": Centering LPNs in the Nursing Labor Force. Racism and Redlining in the History of Psychiatric Policy and Practice in Atlanta: Implications for Nursing. Xylazine in the Unregulated Drug Market: An Integrative Review of Its Prevalence, Health Impacts, and Detection and Intervention Challenges in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1