模式效应:视角问题?有发展性阅读障碍和没有发展性阅读障碍的德国儿童在拼写评估中的写作模式差异

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Dyslexia Pub Date : 2021-02-21 DOI:10.1002/dys.1675
Stefanie Jung, Korbinian Moeller, Elise Klein, Juergen Heller
{"title":"模式效应:视角问题?有发展性阅读障碍和没有发展性阅读障碍的德国儿童在拼写评估中的写作模式差异","authors":"Stefanie Jung,&nbsp;Korbinian Moeller,&nbsp;Elise Klein,&nbsp;Juergen Heller","doi":"10.1002/dys.1675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital technology has an increasing influence on writing processes. In this context, the question arises whether changes in writing mode (i.e., handwriting vs. computer-keyboard typing) also require changes in writing assessments. However, data directly comparing writing mode influences in children with and without developmental writing deficits are scarce. This study investigated the influence of writing mode in German-speaking, typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia (DD) from two different levels. Results showed on a general level that writing mode influenced overall <i>spelling accuracy</i>, <i>writing time</i>, and <i>self-corrections</i> comparably in children with and without DD. On a rule-specific level, outcomes for writing time and self-corrections substantiated these findings. However, as regards <i>spelling accuracy</i>, a mode effect was only apparent for capitalization, whereas other spelling rules were resistant to writing mode influences. Present findings suggest that a mode effect is present only for typing specific aspects (e.g., capitalization) rather than reflecting a general influence on orthographic principles (e.g., grapheme–phoneme assignment, morphologic principles). These mode-specific aspects seem to comparably affect the writing performance of typically developing children and children with DD. We recommend writing assessments to consider that different writing modes may influence individual spelling rules differently.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":"27 3","pages":"373-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1675","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mode effect: An issue of perspective? Writing mode differences in a spelling assessment in German children with and without developmental dyslexia\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Jung,&nbsp;Korbinian Moeller,&nbsp;Elise Klein,&nbsp;Juergen Heller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dys.1675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital technology has an increasing influence on writing processes. In this context, the question arises whether changes in writing mode (i.e., handwriting vs. computer-keyboard typing) also require changes in writing assessments. However, data directly comparing writing mode influences in children with and without developmental writing deficits are scarce. This study investigated the influence of writing mode in German-speaking, typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia (DD) from two different levels. Results showed on a general level that writing mode influenced overall <i>spelling accuracy</i>, <i>writing time</i>, and <i>self-corrections</i> comparably in children with and without DD. On a rule-specific level, outcomes for writing time and self-corrections substantiated these findings. However, as regards <i>spelling accuracy</i>, a mode effect was only apparent for capitalization, whereas other spelling rules were resistant to writing mode influences. Present findings suggest that a mode effect is present only for typing specific aspects (e.g., capitalization) rather than reflecting a general influence on orthographic principles (e.g., grapheme–phoneme assignment, morphologic principles). These mode-specific aspects seem to comparably affect the writing performance of typically developing children and children with DD. We recommend writing assessments to consider that different writing modes may influence individual spelling rules differently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"373-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1675\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数字技术对书写过程的影响越来越大。在这种情况下,出现的问题是,写作模式的改变(即手写与电脑键盘打字)是否也需要改变写作评估。然而,直接比较写作模式对有和无发育性写作缺陷儿童影响的数据很少。本研究从两个不同的层面探讨了写作模式对德语正常发育儿童和发展性阅读障碍儿童的影响。结果显示,在一般水平上,写作模式对有和没有DD的儿童的整体拼写准确性、写作时间和自我纠正的影响是相当的。在特定规则的水平上,写作时间和自我纠正的结果证实了这些发现。然而,就拼写准确性而言,模式效应仅对大写字母有明显影响,而其他拼写规则则不受书写模式的影响。目前的研究结果表明,模态效应只存在于打字的特定方面(例如,大写),而不是反映对正字法原则(例如,字素-音素分配,形态原则)的一般影响。这些特定模式的方面似乎对正常发育儿童和DD儿童的写作表现有相当的影响。我们建议写作评估考虑到不同的写作模式可能对个人拼写规则产生不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mode effect: An issue of perspective? Writing mode differences in a spelling assessment in German children with and without developmental dyslexia

Digital technology has an increasing influence on writing processes. In this context, the question arises whether changes in writing mode (i.e., handwriting vs. computer-keyboard typing) also require changes in writing assessments. However, data directly comparing writing mode influences in children with and without developmental writing deficits are scarce. This study investigated the influence of writing mode in German-speaking, typically developing children and children with developmental dyslexia (DD) from two different levels. Results showed on a general level that writing mode influenced overall spelling accuracy, writing time, and self-corrections comparably in children with and without DD. On a rule-specific level, outcomes for writing time and self-corrections substantiated these findings. However, as regards spelling accuracy, a mode effect was only apparent for capitalization, whereas other spelling rules were resistant to writing mode influences. Present findings suggest that a mode effect is present only for typing specific aspects (e.g., capitalization) rather than reflecting a general influence on orthographic principles (e.g., grapheme–phoneme assignment, morphologic principles). These mode-specific aspects seem to comparably affect the writing performance of typically developing children and children with DD. We recommend writing assessments to consider that different writing modes may influence individual spelling rules differently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dyslexia
Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine
期刊最新文献
Visual Implicit Pre-Cueing Improves Response Time in Decision-Making in Dyslexic Children Presentation matters: Surface text features and text quality in written narratives of Dutch high school students with and without dyslexia Subjective visual vertical/horizontal and video head impulse test in dyslexic children Correction to effects of a visual perception-based occupational therapy programme on reading and motor skills in children with developmental dyslexia: Single blind randomised crossover study design Improving persuasive writing skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities: STOP and DARE strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1