胸痛加速诊断方案中由提供者驱动的随访:多学科质量改进患者安全项目中的 PDSA 循环第二轮。

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2020-01-30
Isaac Troiano, Mary Mitchell, Mark Schury, Nikolai Butki
{"title":"胸痛加速诊断方案中由提供者驱动的随访:多学科质量改进患者安全项目中的 PDSA 循环第二轮。","authors":"Isaac Troiano, Mary Mitchell, Mark Schury, Nikolai Butki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"11727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project.\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Troiano, Mary Mitchell, Mark Schury, Nikolai Butki\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"11727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spartan medical research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2016 年,麦克拉伦奥克兰急诊医学科制定并实施了胸痛加速诊断协议(CP-ADP),以识别因胸痛到急诊科(ED)就诊、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)风险较低且适合门诊随访的患者。QI/PS 项目的评估结果表明,根据 CP-ADP 从急诊科出院的患者中,只有 47% 接受了门诊随访。为此,第二轮 PDSA 循环对 CP-ADP 进行了修改,增加了由多学科医疗人员驱动的随访:方法:急诊室出院后,初级保健医生会联系 CP-ADP 中由医疗服务提供者驱动随访的患者,安排随访预约。前提是这种由医疗服务提供者驱动的随访将减少医疗保健系统导航对随访造成的障碍:结果:对修改后的 CP-ADP 进行评估后发现,在 30 名从急诊室出院的患者中,有 9 人能够联系上。其中 21 名患者提供的电话号码无法联系到他们。只有 3 名通过医疗服务提供者驱动的随访出院的患者参加了随访预约:结论:已发现的一些内部流程故障导致成功联系到的患者人数较少。外部因素,如患者能否使用电话和通信手段,也被认为是最初没有考虑到的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project.

Context: In 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up.

Methods: After ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up.

Results: The evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments.

Conclusions: There were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Porosities of 3D Printed Titanium Implants on the Tensile Properties: Correspondence. Clinical predictors of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: A healthcare system analysis. Bridging Innovation and Clinical Insights: Reflections on Healthcare Research and Emergency Medicine. Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in the Emergency Department for Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Retrospective Analysis Following an Educational Intervention. A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project in a Community Based Hospital Emergency Department - The Benefits of Simplified Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety Quality Improvement Projects Regardless of Staffing Levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1