阿片类药物使用障碍和严重注射相关感染患者的护理级联。

Toxicology communications Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-10 DOI:10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899
Anand Upadhyaya, Laura R Marks, Evan S Schwarz, Stephen Y Liang, Michael J Durkin, David B Liss
{"title":"阿片类药物使用障碍和严重注射相关感染患者的护理级联。","authors":"Anand Upadhyaya,&nbsp;Laura R Marks,&nbsp;Evan S Schwarz,&nbsp;Stephen Y Liang,&nbsp;Michael J Durkin,&nbsp;David B Liss","doi":"10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define the care cascade for patients with serious injection drug use related infections (SIRI) in a tertiary hospital system and compare outcomes of those who did and did not participate in an opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment referral program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients admitted with both OUD and SIRI including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess, thrombophlebitis, myositis, bacteremia, and fungemia from 2016-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical covariates, 90-day readmission rates, and outcomes data were collected. We compared data from those who were successfully referred to outpatient care through Engaging Patients in Care Coordination (EPICC), a peer recovery specialist-run OUD treatment referral program, to those who did not receive outpatient referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period 334 persons who inject opioids were admitted with SIRI. Fourteen admitted patients died and were excluded from the analysis. The all-cause readmission rate was lower among patients referred to the EPICC program (18/76 [23.7%]) compared to those not referred to EPICC (100/244 [41.0%]) (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25 - 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An OUD care cascade evaluation for patients with SIRI demonstrated that referral to peer recovery services with outpatient OUD treatment was associated with reduced 90-day readmission rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23139,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care cascade for patients with opioid use disorder and serious injection related infections.\",\"authors\":\"Anand Upadhyaya,&nbsp;Laura R Marks,&nbsp;Evan S Schwarz,&nbsp;Stephen Y Liang,&nbsp;Michael J Durkin,&nbsp;David B Liss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To define the care cascade for patients with serious injection drug use related infections (SIRI) in a tertiary hospital system and compare outcomes of those who did and did not participate in an opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment referral program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients admitted with both OUD and SIRI including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess, thrombophlebitis, myositis, bacteremia, and fungemia from 2016-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical covariates, 90-day readmission rates, and outcomes data were collected. We compared data from those who were successfully referred to outpatient care through Engaging Patients in Care Coordination (EPICC), a peer recovery specialist-run OUD treatment referral program, to those who did not receive outpatient referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period 334 persons who inject opioids were admitted with SIRI. Fourteen admitted patients died and were excluded from the analysis. The all-cause readmission rate was lower among patients referred to the EPICC program (18/76 [23.7%]) compared to those not referred to EPICC (100/244 [41.0%]) (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25 - 0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An OUD care cascade evaluation for patients with SIRI demonstrated that referral to peer recovery services with outpatient OUD treatment was associated with reduced 90-day readmission rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24734306.2020.1869899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:定义三级医院系统中严重注射药物使用相关感染(SIRI)患者的护理级联,并比较参加和未参加阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗转诊计划的患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析2016-2019年收治的心内膜炎、骨髓炎、脓毒性关节炎、硬膜外脓肿、血栓性静脉炎、肌炎、菌血症和真菌血症患者的病历。收集患者人口统计学、临床协变量、90天再入院率和结局数据。我们比较了通过参与患者护理协调(EPICC)(同伴康复专家运行的OUD治疗转诊项目)成功转诊到门诊的患者和没有转诊到门诊的患者的数据。结果:在研究期间,334名注射阿片类药物的人接受了SIRI。14例入院患者死亡,并被排除在分析之外。接受EPICC治疗的患者的全因再入院率(18/76[23.7%])低于未接受EPICC治疗的患者(100/244 [41.0%])(OR 0.44;95% ci 0.25 - 0.80)。结论:一项针对SIRI患者的OUD护理级联评估表明,转诊到同行康复服务机构接受门诊OUD治疗与降低90天再入院率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care cascade for patients with opioid use disorder and serious injection related infections.

Objectives: To define the care cascade for patients with serious injection drug use related infections (SIRI) in a tertiary hospital system and compare outcomes of those who did and did not participate in an opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment referral program.

Methods: The medical records of patients admitted with both OUD and SIRI including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, epidural abscess, thrombophlebitis, myositis, bacteremia, and fungemia from 2016-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical covariates, 90-day readmission rates, and outcomes data were collected. We compared data from those who were successfully referred to outpatient care through Engaging Patients in Care Coordination (EPICC), a peer recovery specialist-run OUD treatment referral program, to those who did not receive outpatient referral.

Results: During the study period 334 persons who inject opioids were admitted with SIRI. Fourteen admitted patients died and were excluded from the analysis. The all-cause readmission rate was lower among patients referred to the EPICC program (18/76 [23.7%]) compared to those not referred to EPICC (100/244 [41.0%]) (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25 - 0.80).

Conclusion: An OUD care cascade evaluation for patients with SIRI demonstrated that referral to peer recovery services with outpatient OUD treatment was associated with reduced 90-day readmission rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal injury after “huffing” compressed air duster: a case report Cyanide poisoning and organ donation in Australia: a case report Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre Abstracts of the Toxicology and Poisons Network Australasia (TAPNA) 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting (Melbourne, Victoria). Death from bongkrekic acid toxicity: first report in North America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1