Yifan Wang, Taejeong Bae, Jeremy Thorpe, Maxwell A Sherman, Attila G Jones, Sean Cho, Kenneth Daily, Yanmei Dou, Javier Ganz, Alon Galor, Irene Lobon, Reenal Pattni, Chaggai Rosenbluh, Simone Tomasi, Livia Tomasini, Xiaoxu Yang, Bo Zhou, Schahram Akbarian, Laurel L Ball, Sara Bizzotto, Sarah B Emery, Ryan Doan, Liana Fasching, Yeongjun Jang, David Juan, Esther Lizano, Lovelace J Luquette, John B Moldovan, Rujuta Narurkar, Matthew T Oetjens, Rachel E Rodin, Shobana Sekar, Joo Heon Shin, Eduardo Soriano, Richard E Straub, Weichen Zhou, Andrew Chess, Joseph G Gleeson, Tomas Marquès-Bonet, Peter J Park, Mette A Peters, Jonathan Pevsner, Christopher A Walsh, Daniel R Weinberger, Flora M Vaccarino, John V Moran, Alexander E Urban, Jeffrey M Kidd, Ryan E Mills, Alexej Abyzov
{"title":"全面鉴定人类脑组织中的体细胞核苷酸变异。","authors":"Yifan Wang, Taejeong Bae, Jeremy Thorpe, Maxwell A Sherman, Attila G Jones, Sean Cho, Kenneth Daily, Yanmei Dou, Javier Ganz, Alon Galor, Irene Lobon, Reenal Pattni, Chaggai Rosenbluh, Simone Tomasi, Livia Tomasini, Xiaoxu Yang, Bo Zhou, Schahram Akbarian, Laurel L Ball, Sara Bizzotto, Sarah B Emery, Ryan Doan, Liana Fasching, Yeongjun Jang, David Juan, Esther Lizano, Lovelace J Luquette, John B Moldovan, Rujuta Narurkar, Matthew T Oetjens, Rachel E Rodin, Shobana Sekar, Joo Heon Shin, Eduardo Soriano, Richard E Straub, Weichen Zhou, Andrew Chess, Joseph G Gleeson, Tomas Marquès-Bonet, Peter J Park, Mette A Peters, Jonathan Pevsner, Christopher A Walsh, Daniel R Weinberger, Flora M Vaccarino, John V Moran, Alexander E Urban, Jeffrey M Kidd, Ryan E Mills, Alexej Abyzov","doi":"10.1186/s13059-021-02285-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-zygotic mutations incurred during DNA replication, DNA repair, and other cellular processes lead to somatic mosaicism. Somatic mosaicism is an established cause of various diseases, including cancers. However, detecting mosaic variants in DNA from non-cancerous somatic tissues poses significant challenges, particularly if the variants only are present in a small fraction of cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network conducts a coordinated, multi-institutional study to examine the ability of existing methods to detect simulated somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DNA mixing experiments, generate multiple replicates of whole-genome sequencing data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, other brain regions, dura mater, and dural fibroblasts of a single neurotypical individual, devise strategies to discover somatic SNVs, and apply various approaches to validate somatic SNVs. These efforts lead to the identification of 43 bona fide somatic SNVs that range in variant allele fractions from ~ 0.005 to ~ 0.28. Guided by these results, we devise best practices for calling mosaic SNVs from 250× whole-genome sequencing data in the accessible portion of the human genome that achieve 90% specificity and sensitivity. Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of multiple bulk DNA samples from a single individual allows the reconstruction of early developmental cell lineage trees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a unified set of best practices to detect somatic SNVs in non-cancerous tissues. The data and methods are freely available to the scientific community and should serve as a guide to assess the contributions of somatic SNVs to neuropsychiatric diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48922,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"22 1","pages":"92"},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive identification of somatic nucleotide variants in human brain tissue.\",\"authors\":\"Yifan Wang, Taejeong Bae, Jeremy Thorpe, Maxwell A Sherman, Attila G Jones, Sean Cho, Kenneth Daily, Yanmei Dou, Javier Ganz, Alon Galor, Irene Lobon, Reenal Pattni, Chaggai Rosenbluh, Simone Tomasi, Livia Tomasini, Xiaoxu Yang, Bo Zhou, Schahram Akbarian, Laurel L Ball, Sara Bizzotto, Sarah B Emery, Ryan Doan, Liana Fasching, Yeongjun Jang, David Juan, Esther Lizano, Lovelace J Luquette, John B Moldovan, Rujuta Narurkar, Matthew T Oetjens, Rachel E Rodin, Shobana Sekar, Joo Heon Shin, Eduardo Soriano, Richard E Straub, Weichen Zhou, Andrew Chess, Joseph G Gleeson, Tomas Marquès-Bonet, Peter J Park, Mette A Peters, Jonathan Pevsner, Christopher A Walsh, Daniel R Weinberger, Flora M Vaccarino, John V Moran, Alexander E Urban, Jeffrey M Kidd, Ryan E Mills, Alexej Abyzov\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13059-021-02285-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-zygotic mutations incurred during DNA replication, DNA repair, and other cellular processes lead to somatic mosaicism. Somatic mosaicism is an established cause of various diseases, including cancers. However, detecting mosaic variants in DNA from non-cancerous somatic tissues poses significant challenges, particularly if the variants only are present in a small fraction of cells.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Here, the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network conducts a coordinated, multi-institutional study to examine the ability of existing methods to detect simulated somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DNA mixing experiments, generate multiple replicates of whole-genome sequencing data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, other brain regions, dura mater, and dural fibroblasts of a single neurotypical individual, devise strategies to discover somatic SNVs, and apply various approaches to validate somatic SNVs. These efforts lead to the identification of 43 bona fide somatic SNVs that range in variant allele fractions from ~ 0.005 to ~ 0.28. Guided by these results, we devise best practices for calling mosaic SNVs from 250× whole-genome sequencing data in the accessible portion of the human genome that achieve 90% specificity and sensitivity. Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of multiple bulk DNA samples from a single individual allows the reconstruction of early developmental cell lineage trees.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a unified set of best practices to detect somatic SNVs in non-cancerous tissues. The data and methods are freely available to the scientific community and should serve as a guide to assess the contributions of somatic SNVs to neuropsychiatric diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Biology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8006362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02285-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02285-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在 DNA 复制、DNA 修复和其他细胞过程中发生的合子后突变会导致体细胞嵌合。体细胞嵌合是包括癌症在内的多种疾病的既定病因。然而,检测非癌症体细胞组织DNA中的镶嵌变异是一项重大挑战,尤其是当变异只存在于一小部分细胞中时:在此,脑体细胞镶嵌网络开展了一项协调的多机构研究,以检验现有方法在DNA混合实验中检测模拟体细胞单核苷酸变异(SNV)的能力,从一个神经畸形个体的背外侧前额叶皮层、其他脑区、硬脑膜和硬脑膜成纤维细胞中生成多个重复的全基因组测序数据,设计发现体细胞SNV的策略,并应用各种方法验证体细胞SNV。通过这些努力,我们鉴定出了 43 个真正的体细胞 SNV,其变异等位基因分数从 ~ 0.005 到 ~ 0.28 不等。在这些结果的指导下,我们设计了从人类基因组可访问部分的 250× 全基因组测序数据中调用镶嵌 SNV 的最佳方法,其特异性和灵敏度达到了 90%。最后,我们证明了对来自单个个体的多个批量 DNA 样本进行分析可以重建早期发育细胞系树:本研究为检测非癌症组织中的体细胞SNV提供了一套统一的最佳方法。这些数据和方法可供科学界免费使用,可作为评估体细胞SNV对神经精神疾病影响的指南。
Comprehensive identification of somatic nucleotide variants in human brain tissue.
Background: Post-zygotic mutations incurred during DNA replication, DNA repair, and other cellular processes lead to somatic mosaicism. Somatic mosaicism is an established cause of various diseases, including cancers. However, detecting mosaic variants in DNA from non-cancerous somatic tissues poses significant challenges, particularly if the variants only are present in a small fraction of cells.
Results: Here, the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network conducts a coordinated, multi-institutional study to examine the ability of existing methods to detect simulated somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DNA mixing experiments, generate multiple replicates of whole-genome sequencing data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, other brain regions, dura mater, and dural fibroblasts of a single neurotypical individual, devise strategies to discover somatic SNVs, and apply various approaches to validate somatic SNVs. These efforts lead to the identification of 43 bona fide somatic SNVs that range in variant allele fractions from ~ 0.005 to ~ 0.28. Guided by these results, we devise best practices for calling mosaic SNVs from 250× whole-genome sequencing data in the accessible portion of the human genome that achieve 90% specificity and sensitivity. Finally, we demonstrate that analysis of multiple bulk DNA samples from a single individual allows the reconstruction of early developmental cell lineage trees.
Conclusions: This study provides a unified set of best practices to detect somatic SNVs in non-cancerous tissues. The data and methods are freely available to the scientific community and should serve as a guide to assess the contributions of somatic SNVs to neuropsychiatric diseases.
期刊介绍:
Genome Biology is a leading research journal that focuses on the study of biology and biomedicine from a genomic and post-genomic standpoint. The journal consistently publishes outstanding research across various areas within these fields.
With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022), Genome Biology has earned its place as the 3rd highest-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category, according to Thomson Reuters. Additionally, it is ranked 2nd among research journals in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category. It is important to note that Genome Biology is the top-ranking open access journal in this category.
In summary, Genome Biology sets a high standard for scientific publications in the field, showcasing cutting-edge research and earning recognition among its peers.