撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人畜共患疾病防范工作。

One Health Outlook Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8
Linzy Elton, Najmul Haider, Richard Kock, Margaret J Thomason, John Tembo, Liã Bárbara Arruda, Francine Ntoumi, Alimuddin Zumla, Timothy D McHugh
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲国家的人畜共患疾病防范工作。","authors":"Linzy Elton,&nbsp;Najmul Haider,&nbsp;Richard Kock,&nbsp;Margaret J Thomason,&nbsp;John Tembo,&nbsp;Liã Bárbara Arruda,&nbsp;Francine Ntoumi,&nbsp;Alimuddin Zumla,&nbsp;Timothy D McHugh","doi":"10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of high consequence pathogens such as Ebola and SARS-CoV-2, along with the continued burden of neglected diseases such as rabies, has highlighted the need for preparedness for emerging and endemic infectious diseases of zoonotic origin in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a One Health approach. To identify trends in SSA preparedness, the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint External Evaluation (JEE) reports were analysed. JEEs are voluntary, collaborative processes to assess country's capacities to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to public health risks. This report aimed to analyse the JEE zoonotic disease preparedness data as a whole and identify strengths and weaknesses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>JEE zoonotic disease preparedness scores for 44 SSA countries who had completed JEEs were analysed. An overall zoonotic disease preparedness score was calculated as an average of the sum of all the SSA country zoonotic disease preparedness scores and compared to the overall mean JEE score. Zoonotic disease preparedness indicators were analysed and data were collated into regions to identify key areas of strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 'Zoonotic disease' preparedness score (2.35, range 1.00-4.00) was 7% higher compared to the mean overall JEE preparedness score (2.19, range 1.55-3.30), putting 'Zoonotic Diseases' 5th out of 19 JEE sub-areas for preparedness. The average scores for each 'Zoonotic Disease' category were 2.45 for 'Surveillance Systems', 2.76 for 'Veterinary Workforce' and 1.84 for 'Response Mechanisms'. The Southern African region scored highest across the 'Zoonotic disease' categories (2.87).A multisectoral priority zoonotic pathogens list is in place for 43% of SSA countries and 70% reported undertaking national surveillance on 1-5 zoonotic diseases. 70% of SSA countries reported having public health training courses in place for veterinarians and 30% had veterinarians in all districts (reported as sufficient staffing). A multisectoral action plan for zoonotic outbreaks was in place for 14% countries and 32% reported having an established inter-agency response team for zoonotic outbreaks. The zoonotic diseases that appeared most in reported country priority lists were rabies and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) (both 89%), anthrax (83%), and brucellosis (78%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With 'Zoonotic Diseases' ranking 5th in the JEE sub-areas and a mean SSA score 7% greater than the overall mean JEE score, zoonotic disease preparedness appears to have the attention of most SSA countries. However, the considerable range suggests that some countries have more measures in place than others, which may perhaps reflect the geography and types of pathogens that commonly occur. The category 'Response Mechanisms' had the lowest mean score across SSA, suggesting that implementing a multisectoral action plan and response team could provide the greatest gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"3 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zoonotic disease preparedness in sub-Saharan African countries.\",\"authors\":\"Linzy Elton,&nbsp;Najmul Haider,&nbsp;Richard Kock,&nbsp;Margaret J Thomason,&nbsp;John Tembo,&nbsp;Liã Bárbara Arruda,&nbsp;Francine Ntoumi,&nbsp;Alimuddin Zumla,&nbsp;Timothy D McHugh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of high consequence pathogens such as Ebola and SARS-CoV-2, along with the continued burden of neglected diseases such as rabies, has highlighted the need for preparedness for emerging and endemic infectious diseases of zoonotic origin in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a One Health approach. To identify trends in SSA preparedness, the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint External Evaluation (JEE) reports were analysed. JEEs are voluntary, collaborative processes to assess country's capacities to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to public health risks. This report aimed to analyse the JEE zoonotic disease preparedness data as a whole and identify strengths and weaknesses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>JEE zoonotic disease preparedness scores for 44 SSA countries who had completed JEEs were analysed. An overall zoonotic disease preparedness score was calculated as an average of the sum of all the SSA country zoonotic disease preparedness scores and compared to the overall mean JEE score. Zoonotic disease preparedness indicators were analysed and data were collated into regions to identify key areas of strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 'Zoonotic disease' preparedness score (2.35, range 1.00-4.00) was 7% higher compared to the mean overall JEE preparedness score (2.19, range 1.55-3.30), putting 'Zoonotic Diseases' 5th out of 19 JEE sub-areas for preparedness. The average scores for each 'Zoonotic Disease' category were 2.45 for 'Surveillance Systems', 2.76 for 'Veterinary Workforce' and 1.84 for 'Response Mechanisms'. The Southern African region scored highest across the 'Zoonotic disease' categories (2.87).A multisectoral priority zoonotic pathogens list is in place for 43% of SSA countries and 70% reported undertaking national surveillance on 1-5 zoonotic diseases. 70% of SSA countries reported having public health training courses in place for veterinarians and 30% had veterinarians in all districts (reported as sufficient staffing). A multisectoral action plan for zoonotic outbreaks was in place for 14% countries and 32% reported having an established inter-agency response team for zoonotic outbreaks. The zoonotic diseases that appeared most in reported country priority lists were rabies and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) (both 89%), anthrax (83%), and brucellosis (78%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With 'Zoonotic Diseases' ranking 5th in the JEE sub-areas and a mean SSA score 7% greater than the overall mean JEE score, zoonotic disease preparedness appears to have the attention of most SSA countries. However, the considerable range suggests that some countries have more measures in place than others, which may perhaps reflect the geography and types of pathogens that commonly occur. The category 'Response Mechanisms' had the lowest mean score across SSA, suggesting that implementing a multisectoral action plan and response team could provide the greatest gains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00037-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:埃博拉和SARS-CoV-2等后果严重的病原体的出现,以及狂犬病等被忽视疾病的持续负担,突出表明需要利用“同一个健康”方法,对撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)人畜共患病源的新发和流行传染病做好准备。为了确定防范SSA的趋势,对世界卫生组织(世卫组织)联合外部评价报告进行了分析。评估是自愿的协作过程,旨在评估国家预防、发现和快速应对公共卫生风险的能力。本报告旨在从整体上分析JEE人畜共患疾病防范数据,并确定优势和劣势。方法:对已完成JEE的44个SSA国家的JEE人畜共患病防范评分进行分析。总体人畜共患疾病防范得分计算为所有SSA国家人畜共患疾病防范得分之和的平均值,并与JEE总体平均得分进行比较。分析了人畜共患疾病防范指标,并按区域整理了数据,以确定关键的优势领域。结果:“人畜共患疾病”的平均防范得分(2.35,范围1.00-4.00)比JEE的平均总体防范得分(2.19,范围1.55-3.30)高7%,使“人畜共患疾病”在JEE的19个分区中排名第五。每个“人畜共患疾病”类别的平均得分为“监测系统”2.45分,“兽医队伍”2.76分,“反应机制”1.84分。南部非洲地区在“人畜共患疾病”类别中得分最高(2.87分)。43%的撒哈拉以南非洲国家制定了多部门重点人畜共患病原体清单,70%的国家报告对1-5种人畜共患疾病进行了国家监测。70%的SSA国家报告为兽医开设了公共卫生培训课程,30%的国家在所有地区都有兽医(报告人员配备充足)。14%的国家制定了应对人畜共患病暴发的多部门行动计划,32%的国家报告设立了应对人畜共患病暴发的机构间反应小组。在报告的国家重点清单中出现最多的人畜共患疾病是狂犬病和高致病性禽流感(均为89%)、炭疽(83%)和布鲁氏菌病(78%)。结论:由于“人畜共患疾病”在JEE次区域中排名第五,并且SSA平均得分比JEE总体平均得分高出7%,因此大多数SSA国家似乎都重视人畜共患疾病的防范。然而,相当大的范围表明,一些国家比其他国家采取了更多的措施,这可能反映了通常发生的病原体的地理位置和类型。“反应机制”类别在整个SSA中的平均得分最低,这表明实施多部门行动计划和反应小组可以带来最大的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zoonotic disease preparedness in sub-Saharan African countries.

Background: The emergence of high consequence pathogens such as Ebola and SARS-CoV-2, along with the continued burden of neglected diseases such as rabies, has highlighted the need for preparedness for emerging and endemic infectious diseases of zoonotic origin in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) using a One Health approach. To identify trends in SSA preparedness, the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint External Evaluation (JEE) reports were analysed. JEEs are voluntary, collaborative processes to assess country's capacities to prevent, detect and rapidly respond to public health risks. This report aimed to analyse the JEE zoonotic disease preparedness data as a whole and identify strengths and weaknesses.

Methods: JEE zoonotic disease preparedness scores for 44 SSA countries who had completed JEEs were analysed. An overall zoonotic disease preparedness score was calculated as an average of the sum of all the SSA country zoonotic disease preparedness scores and compared to the overall mean JEE score. Zoonotic disease preparedness indicators were analysed and data were collated into regions to identify key areas of strength.

Results: The mean 'Zoonotic disease' preparedness score (2.35, range 1.00-4.00) was 7% higher compared to the mean overall JEE preparedness score (2.19, range 1.55-3.30), putting 'Zoonotic Diseases' 5th out of 19 JEE sub-areas for preparedness. The average scores for each 'Zoonotic Disease' category were 2.45 for 'Surveillance Systems', 2.76 for 'Veterinary Workforce' and 1.84 for 'Response Mechanisms'. The Southern African region scored highest across the 'Zoonotic disease' categories (2.87).A multisectoral priority zoonotic pathogens list is in place for 43% of SSA countries and 70% reported undertaking national surveillance on 1-5 zoonotic diseases. 70% of SSA countries reported having public health training courses in place for veterinarians and 30% had veterinarians in all districts (reported as sufficient staffing). A multisectoral action plan for zoonotic outbreaks was in place for 14% countries and 32% reported having an established inter-agency response team for zoonotic outbreaks. The zoonotic diseases that appeared most in reported country priority lists were rabies and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) (both 89%), anthrax (83%), and brucellosis (78%).

Conclusions: With 'Zoonotic Diseases' ranking 5th in the JEE sub-areas and a mean SSA score 7% greater than the overall mean JEE score, zoonotic disease preparedness appears to have the attention of most SSA countries. However, the considerable range suggests that some countries have more measures in place than others, which may perhaps reflect the geography and types of pathogens that commonly occur. The category 'Response Mechanisms' had the lowest mean score across SSA, suggesting that implementing a multisectoral action plan and response team could provide the greatest gains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1