建立实用的国家 "一个健康 "平台:坦桑尼亚的案例。

One Health Outlook Pub Date : 2019-11-27 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s42522-019-0003-0
Andrew Y Kitua, Susan Scribner, Mark Rasmuson, Dominic Kambarage, Janneth Mghamba, Elibariki R Mwakapeje, Harrison Chinyuka, Jubilate Bernard, Kate Zimmerman, Sambe Duale, David Mutonga
{"title":"建立实用的国家 \"一个健康 \"平台:坦桑尼亚的案例。","authors":"Andrew Y Kitua, Susan Scribner, Mark Rasmuson, Dominic Kambarage, Janneth Mghamba, Elibariki R Mwakapeje, Harrison Chinyuka, Jubilate Bernard, Kate Zimmerman, Sambe Duale, David Mutonga","doi":"10.1186/s42522-019-0003-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The USAID Preparedness and Response (P&R) project's publication on Multisectoral Coordination that Works identified five dimensions most critical to creating effective and sustainable One Health platforms: political commitment, institutional structure, management and coordination capacity, technical and financial resources, and joint planning and implementation. This case study describes Tanzania experience in using these dimensions to establish a functional One Health platform. The main objective of this case study was to document the process of institutionalizing the One Health approach in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of the process used to establish and institutionalize the MCM in Tanzania through addressing the five dimensions mentioned above was conducted between August 2018 and January 2019. Progress activity reports, annual reports and minutes of meetings and consultations regarding the establishment of the Tanzania national One Health platform were examined. Relevant One Health publications were studied as reference material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This case study illustrates the time and level of effort required of multiple partners to build a functional multi-sectoral coordinating mechanism (MCM). Key facilitating factors were identified and the importance of involving policy and decision makers at all stages of the process to facilitate policy decisions and the institutionalization process was underscored. The need for molding the implementation process using lessons learnt along the way -- \"sailing the ship as it was being built\" -- is demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tanzania now has a functioning and institutionalized MCM with a sound institutional structure and capacity to prevent, detect early and respond to health events. The path to its establishment required the patient commitment of a core group of One Health champions and stakeholders along the way to examine carefully and iteratively how best to structure productive multisectoral coordination in the country. The five dimensions identified by the Preparedness and Response project may provide useful guidance to other countries working to establish functional MCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"1 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a functional national One Health platform: the case of Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Y Kitua, Susan Scribner, Mark Rasmuson, Dominic Kambarage, Janneth Mghamba, Elibariki R Mwakapeje, Harrison Chinyuka, Jubilate Bernard, Kate Zimmerman, Sambe Duale, David Mutonga\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42522-019-0003-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The USAID Preparedness and Response (P&R) project's publication on Multisectoral Coordination that Works identified five dimensions most critical to creating effective and sustainable One Health platforms: political commitment, institutional structure, management and coordination capacity, technical and financial resources, and joint planning and implementation. This case study describes Tanzania experience in using these dimensions to establish a functional One Health platform. The main objective of this case study was to document the process of institutionalizing the One Health approach in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of the process used to establish and institutionalize the MCM in Tanzania through addressing the five dimensions mentioned above was conducted between August 2018 and January 2019. Progress activity reports, annual reports and minutes of meetings and consultations regarding the establishment of the Tanzania national One Health platform were examined. Relevant One Health publications were studied as reference material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This case study illustrates the time and level of effort required of multiple partners to build a functional multi-sectoral coordinating mechanism (MCM). Key facilitating factors were identified and the importance of involving policy and decision makers at all stages of the process to facilitate policy decisions and the institutionalization process was underscored. The need for molding the implementation process using lessons learnt along the way -- \\\"sailing the ship as it was being built\\\" -- is demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tanzania now has a functioning and institutionalized MCM with a sound institutional structure and capacity to prevent, detect early and respond to health events. The path to its establishment required the patient commitment of a core group of One Health champions and stakeholders along the way to examine carefully and iteratively how best to structure productive multisectoral coordination in the country. The five dimensions identified by the Preparedness and Response project may provide useful guidance to other countries working to establish functional MCM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7990094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"One Health Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-019-0003-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-019-0003-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国国际开发署(USAID)的 "准备与响应"(P&R)项目出版了《有效的多部门协调》(Multisectoral Coordination that Works)一书,确定了对建立有效和可持续的 "一个卫生 "平台最为关键的五个方面:政治承诺、体制结构、管理和协调能力、技术和财政资源以及联合规划和实施。本案例研究介绍了坦桑尼亚在利用这些方面建立实用的 "一个健康 "平台方面的经验。本案例研究的主要目的是记录坦桑尼亚将 "一体健康 "方法制度化的过程:在 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,对坦桑尼亚通过处理上述五个维度来建立和制度化 "一体健康 "方法的过程进行了分析。研究了有关建立坦桑尼亚国家 "一个健康 "平台的进展活动报告、年度报告以及会议和磋商记录。还研究了相关的 "一个健康 "出版物作为参考资料:本案例研究说明了多个合作伙伴为建立一个实用的多部门协调机制(MCM)所需的时间和付出的努力。确定了关键的促进因素,并强调了让政策制定者和决策者参与进程各个阶段以促进政策决策和制度化进程的重要性。结论:坦桑尼亚现在已经有了一个正常运作和制度化的多学科协调机制,具有健全的体制结构和预防、及早发现和应对健康事件的能力。在建立多部门协调机制的过程中,需要 "一个健康 "组织的核心倡导者和利益相关者一路耐心投入,仔细研究和反复推敲如何以最佳方式在该国建立富有成效的多部门协调机制。准备和应对项目确定的五个方面可为其他努力建立有效的多部门协调机制的国家提供有益的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building a functional national One Health platform: the case of Tanzania.

Background: The USAID Preparedness and Response (P&R) project's publication on Multisectoral Coordination that Works identified five dimensions most critical to creating effective and sustainable One Health platforms: political commitment, institutional structure, management and coordination capacity, technical and financial resources, and joint planning and implementation. This case study describes Tanzania experience in using these dimensions to establish a functional One Health platform. The main objective of this case study was to document the process of institutionalizing the One Health approach in Tanzania.

Methods: An analysis of the process used to establish and institutionalize the MCM in Tanzania through addressing the five dimensions mentioned above was conducted between August 2018 and January 2019. Progress activity reports, annual reports and minutes of meetings and consultations regarding the establishment of the Tanzania national One Health platform were examined. Relevant One Health publications were studied as reference material.

Results: This case study illustrates the time and level of effort required of multiple partners to build a functional multi-sectoral coordinating mechanism (MCM). Key facilitating factors were identified and the importance of involving policy and decision makers at all stages of the process to facilitate policy decisions and the institutionalization process was underscored. The need for molding the implementation process using lessons learnt along the way -- "sailing the ship as it was being built" -- is demonstrated.

Conclusions: Tanzania now has a functioning and institutionalized MCM with a sound institutional structure and capacity to prevent, detect early and respond to health events. The path to its establishment required the patient commitment of a core group of One Health champions and stakeholders along the way to examine carefully and iteratively how best to structure productive multisectoral coordination in the country. The five dimensions identified by the Preparedness and Response project may provide useful guidance to other countries working to establish functional MCM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global One Health post-graduate programmes: a review The impact of controlling diseases of significant global importance on greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) Drug resistance and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs) - producing Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species from the views of one-health approach in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pillars for successful operationalization of one health as an ecosystem approach: experience from a human-animal interface in the Maasai steppe in Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1