在精神病院接受家庭阿片类药物处方的患者的住院治疗特征

The Mental Health Clinician Pub Date : 2021-03-31 eCollection Date: 2021-03-01 DOI:10.9740/mhc.2021.03.055
Kei Takamura, Amy M Hebbard, Sophie Robert
{"title":"在精神病院接受家庭阿片类药物处方的患者的住院治疗特征","authors":"Kei Takamura,&nbsp;Amy M Hebbard,&nbsp;Sophie Robert","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2021.03.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with mental illness are particularly at risk for OUD, and due to this higher risk, providers may be more inclined to withhold their home opioids when they are admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Patients whose home opioids are continued or withheld during admission may be treated differently with respect to pain control, orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents, orders for intramuscular as-needed medications, orders for seclusion and/or restraints, and outpatient referrals for OUD treatment. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to characterize inpatient care for these 2 patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one inpatient encounters were reviewed for patients who had opioid prescriptions before admission and were discharged from the medical center's psychiatric service from June 1 through August 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents and intramuscular as-needed medications trended higher for the opioid-withheld group, suggesting greater polypharmacy and patient dissatisfaction compared with the opioid-continued group. Additionally, what became evident was the lack of consistent and clear documentation regarding the discharge plans for the patients' home opioid and OUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings may prompt inpatient interdisciplinary teams to develop a better process of documentation to facilitate continuity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"11 2","pages":"55-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/18/i2168-9709-11-2-55.PMC8019545.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of inpatient care for patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital with a home opioid prescription.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Takamura,&nbsp;Amy M Hebbard,&nbsp;Sophie Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/mhc.2021.03.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with mental illness are particularly at risk for OUD, and due to this higher risk, providers may be more inclined to withhold their home opioids when they are admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Patients whose home opioids are continued or withheld during admission may be treated differently with respect to pain control, orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents, orders for intramuscular as-needed medications, orders for seclusion and/or restraints, and outpatient referrals for OUD treatment. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to characterize inpatient care for these 2 patient populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one inpatient encounters were reviewed for patients who had opioid prescriptions before admission and were discharged from the medical center's psychiatric service from June 1 through August 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents and intramuscular as-needed medications trended higher for the opioid-withheld group, suggesting greater polypharmacy and patient dissatisfaction compared with the opioid-continued group. Additionally, what became evident was the lack of consistent and clear documentation regarding the discharge plans for the patients' home opioid and OUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings may prompt inpatient interdisciplinary teams to develop a better process of documentation to facilitate continuity of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"55-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/92/18/i2168-9709-11-2-55.PMC8019545.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Mental Health Clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.03.055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mental Health Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2021.03.055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神疾病患者患OUD的风险特别高,由于这种风险较高,当他们被送往精神病院时,提供者可能更倾向于扣留他们的家用阿片类药物。在入院期间继续使用或不使用家庭阿片类药物的患者可能在疼痛控制、非阿片类辅助止痛药的订单、肌肉内按需药物的订单、隔离和/或约束的订单以及OUD治疗的门诊转诊方面受到不同的治疗。本回顾性初步研究的目的是表征这两种患者群体的住院治疗。方法:对2019年6月1日至8月31日期间从该医疗中心精神科出院的31例入院前服用阿片类药物的患者进行回顾性分析。结果:非阿片类药物辅助止痛药和肌肉按需药物的订单在阿片类药物保留组中呈上升趋势,表明与阿片类药物持续组相比,更多的药物使用和患者不满。此外,显而易见的是,缺乏关于患者家庭阿片类药物和OUD治疗的出院计划的一致和清晰的文件。讨论:这些发现可能会促使住院跨学科团队开发更好的记录过程,以促进护理的连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of inpatient care for patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital with a home opioid prescription.

Introduction: Patients with mental illness are particularly at risk for OUD, and due to this higher risk, providers may be more inclined to withhold their home opioids when they are admitted to a psychiatric hospital. Patients whose home opioids are continued or withheld during admission may be treated differently with respect to pain control, orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents, orders for intramuscular as-needed medications, orders for seclusion and/or restraints, and outpatient referrals for OUD treatment. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to characterize inpatient care for these 2 patient populations.

Methods: Thirty-one inpatient encounters were reviewed for patients who had opioid prescriptions before admission and were discharged from the medical center's psychiatric service from June 1 through August 31, 2019.

Results: Orders for nonopioid adjunctive pain agents and intramuscular as-needed medications trended higher for the opioid-withheld group, suggesting greater polypharmacy and patient dissatisfaction compared with the opioid-continued group. Additionally, what became evident was the lack of consistent and clear documentation regarding the discharge plans for the patients' home opioid and OUD treatment.

Discussion: These findings may prompt inpatient interdisciplinary teams to develop a better process of documentation to facilitate continuity of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring real-world symptom impact and improvement in well-being domains for tardive dyskinesia in VMAT2 inhibitor-treated patients via clinician survey and chart review Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital Barriers to access to psychiatric medications in Missouri county jails Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports Intranasal ketamine as a treatment for psychiatric complications of long COVID: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1