伤害是自由的代价吗?植入前诊断和生殖自由。

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Ethical Perspectives Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.2143/ep.10.3.503887
Hille Haker
{"title":"伤害是自由的代价吗?植入前诊断和生殖自由。","authors":"Hille Haker","doi":"10.2143/ep.10.3.503887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive autonomy is often used as an argument to offer assisted reproduction services to women and to continue research into improving this service. What is often overlooked, however, is the gendered and normative background of parenthood, especially of motherhood. In this paper, I attempt to make women visible and to listen to their voices. Turning to the women's stories, the ethical perspective might be reversed: the so-called 'side-effects' of the overall successful assisted reproduction with or without genetic diagnosis, are to be considered the 'main effects' of assisted reproduction--true for the majority of couples and women. Autonomy, then, must be reformulated as concept of moral agency in the context of divergent social contexts and cultures of parenthood, of socially shaped images of disability, and in the context of scientific visions of technology which do not necessarily match with the medical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54109,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Perspectives","volume":"10 3-4","pages":"215-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ep.10.3.503887","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harm as the price of liberty? Pre-implantation diagnosis and reproductive freedom.\",\"authors\":\"Hille Haker\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ep.10.3.503887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reproductive autonomy is often used as an argument to offer assisted reproduction services to women and to continue research into improving this service. What is often overlooked, however, is the gendered and normative background of parenthood, especially of motherhood. In this paper, I attempt to make women visible and to listen to their voices. Turning to the women's stories, the ethical perspective might be reversed: the so-called 'side-effects' of the overall successful assisted reproduction with or without genetic diagnosis, are to be considered the 'main effects' of assisted reproduction--true for the majority of couples and women. Autonomy, then, must be reformulated as concept of moral agency in the context of divergent social contexts and cultures of parenthood, of socially shaped images of disability, and in the context of scientific visions of technology which do not necessarily match with the medical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"10 3-4\",\"pages\":\"215-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ep.10.3.503887\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ep.10.3.503887\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ep.10.3.503887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

生殖自主经常被用作向妇女提供辅助生殖服务和继续研究改进这项服务的理由。然而,经常被忽视的是为人父母,特别是为人母的性别和规范背景。在这篇论文中,我试图让女性被看到,并倾听她们的声音。转到女性的故事,伦理观点可能会反过来:无论是否有基因诊断,总体上成功的辅助生殖的所谓“副作用”应该被认为是辅助生殖的“主要影响”——对大多数夫妇和女性来说都是如此。因此,自主性必须在不同的社会背景和亲子文化背景下,在社会塑造的残疾形象背景下,在不一定与医疗实践相匹配的科学技术背景下,作为道德代理的概念重新表述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harm as the price of liberty? Pre-implantation diagnosis and reproductive freedom.

Reproductive autonomy is often used as an argument to offer assisted reproduction services to women and to continue research into improving this service. What is often overlooked, however, is the gendered and normative background of parenthood, especially of motherhood. In this paper, I attempt to make women visible and to listen to their voices. Turning to the women's stories, the ethical perspective might be reversed: the so-called 'side-effects' of the overall successful assisted reproduction with or without genetic diagnosis, are to be considered the 'main effects' of assisted reproduction--true for the majority of couples and women. Autonomy, then, must be reformulated as concept of moral agency in the context of divergent social contexts and cultures of parenthood, of socially shaped images of disability, and in the context of scientific visions of technology which do not necessarily match with the medical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A particularist account of moral principles Experimenting with Basic Income Inspired Experiments Relational Normative Economics: An African Approach to Justice Précis of John Rawls: Reticent Socialist A comparison of approaches to virtue for nursing ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1