{"title":"患有特应性皮炎和牛奶过敏的婴儿在出生后两年内食用大米水解物配方奶粉的体重z分数。","authors":"Francesco Savino, Emanuele Castagno, Giovanna Monti, Paola Serraino, Amalia Peltran, Roberto Oggero, Silvia Fanaro, Vittorio Vigi, Leandra Silvestro","doi":"10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, rice-based formulas have been widely used in hypoallergenic diets, but data on nutritional values are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the growth of infants fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula, compared to those infants fed with a soy formula or an extensively hydrolysed casein formula, in the first 2 y of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 infants were enrolled between March 2002 and March 2004. Fifty-eight infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) and cow's milk allergy (CMA), confirmed by open challenge, were enrolled as study group: 15 were fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula (RHF), 17 with a soy-based formula (SF) and 26 with an extensively hydrolysed casein formula (eHCF). Thirty infants with AD without cow's milk allergy were recruited as a control group (CG) and fed with a free diet. Weight was recorded on enrolment and at 3-monthly intervals in the first year of life, and at 6-monthly intervals in the second year. Infants were weighed naked, before feeding, by means of an electronic integrating scale. The z-scores of weight for age were calculated.</p><p><strong>Statistics: </strong>One-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test were used for statistical comparison. Significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences between the RHF, SF and eHCF groups were observed for the z-score of weight for age during the first 2 y of life, but a significantly lower difference was seen in the RHF group compared to the control group in the intervals 9 mo-1 y (p=0.025) and 1-1.5 y (p=0.020) of age. In contrast, the SF and eHCF groups were comparable to the control group, but the eHCF group was significantly lower (p=0) in the first trimester of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if our findings show no significant difference between RHF and control, low weight observed in infants fed with RHF raises doubts about the nutritional adequacy of rice-hydrolysate formulas.</p>","PeriodicalId":76973,"journal":{"name":"Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement","volume":"94 449","pages":"115-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Z-score of weight for age of infants with atopic dermatitis and cow's milk allergy fed with a rice-hydrolysate formula during the first two years of life.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Savino, Emanuele Castagno, Giovanna Monti, Paola Serraino, Amalia Peltran, Roberto Oggero, Silvia Fanaro, Vittorio Vigi, Leandra Silvestro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, rice-based formulas have been widely used in hypoallergenic diets, but data on nutritional values are scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the growth of infants fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula, compared to those infants fed with a soy formula or an extensively hydrolysed casein formula, in the first 2 y of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 88 infants were enrolled between March 2002 and March 2004. Fifty-eight infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) and cow's milk allergy (CMA), confirmed by open challenge, were enrolled as study group: 15 were fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula (RHF), 17 with a soy-based formula (SF) and 26 with an extensively hydrolysed casein formula (eHCF). Thirty infants with AD without cow's milk allergy were recruited as a control group (CG) and fed with a free diet. Weight was recorded on enrolment and at 3-monthly intervals in the first year of life, and at 6-monthly intervals in the second year. Infants were weighed naked, before feeding, by means of an electronic integrating scale. The z-scores of weight for age were calculated.</p><p><strong>Statistics: </strong>One-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test were used for statistical comparison. Significance was set at p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences between the RHF, SF and eHCF groups were observed for the z-score of weight for age during the first 2 y of life, but a significantly lower difference was seen in the RHF group compared to the control group in the intervals 9 mo-1 y (p=0.025) and 1-1.5 y (p=0.020) of age. In contrast, the SF and eHCF groups were comparable to the control group, but the eHCF group was significantly lower (p=0) in the first trimester of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if our findings show no significant difference between RHF and control, low weight observed in infants fed with RHF raises doubts about the nutritional adequacy of rice-hydrolysate formulas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement\",\"volume\":\"94 449\",\"pages\":\"115-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb02166.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
摘要
背景:近年来,以大米为基础的配方被广泛应用于低过敏性饮食中,但关于营养价值的数据很少。目的:评价以大米为基础的水解配方奶粉喂养的婴儿,与以大豆配方奶粉或广泛水解酪蛋白配方奶粉喂养的婴儿相比,在生命的头2岁的生长情况。方法:2002年3月至2004年3月,共纳入88例婴儿。58名经公开挑战证实患有特应性皮炎(AD)和牛奶过敏(CMA)的婴儿被纳入研究组:15名婴儿喂食大米水解物配方奶粉(RHF), 17名喂食大豆水解物配方奶粉(SF), 26名喂食广泛水解酪蛋白配方奶粉(eHCF)。选取30例无牛奶过敏的AD患儿作为对照组(CG),给予免费饮食。在入组时记录体重,第一年每隔3个月记录一次,第二年每隔6个月记录一次。婴儿在喂食前裸体称重,用电子积分秤称重。计算年龄体重的z分数。统计学:采用单因素方差分析和学生t检验进行统计学比较。结果:RHF组、SF组和eHCF组在出生后前2y体重年龄z分差异无统计学意义,但RHF组在9mo - 1y (p=0.025)和1-1.5 y (p=0.020)年龄区间与对照组相比差异显著降低。相比之下,SF和eHCF组与对照组相当,但eHCF组在生命的前三个月显著低于对照组(p=0)。结论:即使我们的研究结果显示RHF和对照组之间没有显著差异,但在RHF喂养的婴儿中观察到的低体重引起了对大米水解配方奶粉营养充分性的怀疑。
Z-score of weight for age of infants with atopic dermatitis and cow's milk allergy fed with a rice-hydrolysate formula during the first two years of life.
Background: Recently, rice-based formulas have been widely used in hypoallergenic diets, but data on nutritional values are scarce.
Aim: To evaluate the growth of infants fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula, compared to those infants fed with a soy formula or an extensively hydrolysed casein formula, in the first 2 y of life.
Methods: A total of 88 infants were enrolled between March 2002 and March 2004. Fifty-eight infants with atopic dermatitis (AD) and cow's milk allergy (CMA), confirmed by open challenge, were enrolled as study group: 15 were fed with a rice-based hydrolysate formula (RHF), 17 with a soy-based formula (SF) and 26 with an extensively hydrolysed casein formula (eHCF). Thirty infants with AD without cow's milk allergy were recruited as a control group (CG) and fed with a free diet. Weight was recorded on enrolment and at 3-monthly intervals in the first year of life, and at 6-monthly intervals in the second year. Infants were weighed naked, before feeding, by means of an electronic integrating scale. The z-scores of weight for age were calculated.
Statistics: One-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test were used for statistical comparison. Significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: No significant differences between the RHF, SF and eHCF groups were observed for the z-score of weight for age during the first 2 y of life, but a significantly lower difference was seen in the RHF group compared to the control group in the intervals 9 mo-1 y (p=0.025) and 1-1.5 y (p=0.020) of age. In contrast, the SF and eHCF groups were comparable to the control group, but the eHCF group was significantly lower (p=0) in the first trimester of life.
Conclusion: Even if our findings show no significant difference between RHF and control, low weight observed in infants fed with RHF raises doubts about the nutritional adequacy of rice-hydrolysate formulas.