印度尼西亚穷人的避孕药具使用情况。

Juan Schoemaker
{"title":"印度尼西亚穷人的避孕药具使用情况。","authors":"Juan Schoemaker","doi":"10.1363/3110605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Indonesia has experienced a dramatic increase in contraceptive use and an equally dramatic fertility decline over the last 30 years. Yet recent reductions in family planning funding, program decentralization and the diminishing role of the public sector as a service provider may lead to lower use among poor women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for analysis were drawn from the 2002-2003 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey. Bivariate techniques were used to compare overall contraceptive use, reliance on specific methods, source of supplies and reasons for nonuse of contraceptives between poor and better-off women. Multivariate regression assessed the association between use of a modern method and selected social, demographic and attitudinal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Better-off women wanted significantly fewer children than did moderately or extremely poor women (2.8 vs. 3.0-3.4), were more likely to approve of family planning (93% vs. 87-91%) and were more likely to believe their spouses approved (91% vs. 80-87%). Better-off women and moderately poor women had higher odds of using modern contraceptives than did extremely poor women (odds ratios, 1.6 and 1.4, respectively). Compared with women who gave a non-numeric response, those who wanted two or fewer children had higher odds of using a modern method (2.0). The odds were also higher among women who lived in a district in which the mean ideal number of children was below the national median (1.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governmental efforts to increase contraceptive use among poor women need to focus on changing attitudes toward smaller family sizes and family planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":81537,"journal":{"name":"International family planning perspectives","volume":"31 3","pages":"106-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraceptive use among the poor in Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Schoemaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/3110605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Indonesia has experienced a dramatic increase in contraceptive use and an equally dramatic fertility decline over the last 30 years. Yet recent reductions in family planning funding, program decentralization and the diminishing role of the public sector as a service provider may lead to lower use among poor women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for analysis were drawn from the 2002-2003 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey. Bivariate techniques were used to compare overall contraceptive use, reliance on specific methods, source of supplies and reasons for nonuse of contraceptives between poor and better-off women. Multivariate regression assessed the association between use of a modern method and selected social, demographic and attitudinal characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Better-off women wanted significantly fewer children than did moderately or extremely poor women (2.8 vs. 3.0-3.4), were more likely to approve of family planning (93% vs. 87-91%) and were more likely to believe their spouses approved (91% vs. 80-87%). Better-off women and moderately poor women had higher odds of using modern contraceptives than did extremely poor women (odds ratios, 1.6 and 1.4, respectively). Compared with women who gave a non-numeric response, those who wanted two or fewer children had higher odds of using a modern method (2.0). The odds were also higher among women who lived in a district in which the mean ideal number of children was below the national median (1.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Governmental efforts to increase contraceptive use among poor women need to focus on changing attitudes toward smaller family sizes and family planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"106-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International family planning perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/3110605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/3110605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

背景:在过去30年中,印度尼西亚避孕药具的使用急剧增加,生育率也同样急剧下降。然而,最近计划生育资金的减少、项目的权力下放以及公共部门作为服务提供者的作用减弱,可能导致贫困妇女使用药物的人数减少。方法:分析数据来自2002-2003年印度尼西亚人口与健康调查。双变量技术用于比较贫穷妇女和较富裕妇女之间避孕药具的总体使用情况、对特定方法的依赖、供应来源和不使用避孕药具的原因。多元回归评估了使用现代方法与选定的社会、人口和态度特征之间的关系。结果:较富裕的女性比中等或极端贫困的女性想要更少的孩子(2.8比3.0-3.4),更有可能赞成计划生育(93%比87-91%),更有可能相信他们的配偶赞成(91%比80-87%)。较富裕的妇女和中等贫穷的妇女比极端贫穷的妇女使用现代避孕药具的几率更高(比值比分别为1.6和1.4)。与那些给出非数字回答的女性相比,那些想要两个或更少孩子的女性使用现代方法的几率更高(2.0)。生活在平均理想子女数低于全国平均水平(1.5个)的地区的女性患乳腺癌的几率也更高。结论:政府增加贫困妇女避孕药具使用的努力需要侧重于改变对小家庭规模和计划生育的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contraceptive use among the poor in Indonesia.

Context: Indonesia has experienced a dramatic increase in contraceptive use and an equally dramatic fertility decline over the last 30 years. Yet recent reductions in family planning funding, program decentralization and the diminishing role of the public sector as a service provider may lead to lower use among poor women.

Methods: The data for analysis were drawn from the 2002-2003 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey. Bivariate techniques were used to compare overall contraceptive use, reliance on specific methods, source of supplies and reasons for nonuse of contraceptives between poor and better-off women. Multivariate regression assessed the association between use of a modern method and selected social, demographic and attitudinal characteristics.

Results: Better-off women wanted significantly fewer children than did moderately or extremely poor women (2.8 vs. 3.0-3.4), were more likely to approve of family planning (93% vs. 87-91%) and were more likely to believe their spouses approved (91% vs. 80-87%). Better-off women and moderately poor women had higher odds of using modern contraceptives than did extremely poor women (odds ratios, 1.6 and 1.4, respectively). Compared with women who gave a non-numeric response, those who wanted two or fewer children had higher odds of using a modern method (2.0). The odds were also higher among women who lived in a district in which the mean ideal number of children was below the national median (1.5).

Conclusion: Governmental efforts to increase contraceptive use among poor women need to focus on changing attitudes toward smaller family sizes and family planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Danlou Tablet May Alleviate Vascular Injury Caused by Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia through Regulating FIH-1, HIF-1, and Angptl4. An Update to the Pilot Study of 177Lu-PSMA in Low Volume Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Psychometric properties of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (KKaPsy). The role of social support and parity on contraceptive use in Cambodia Early coital debut and associated HIV risk factors among young women and men in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1