低白蛋白血症或高白蛋白血症对血清阴离子间隙的影响

Mark Feldman, Nilam Soni, Beverly Dickson
{"title":"低白蛋白血症或高白蛋白血症对血清阴离子间隙的影响","authors":"Mark Feldman,&nbsp;Nilam Soni,&nbsp;Beverly Dickson","doi":"10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Background: Conflicting data exist as to what extent hypoalbuminemia reduces the anion gap; estimates range from 1.5 to 2.5 mM per g/dL decrease in serum albumin. Methods: We measured serum albumin, total protein, and electrolyte concentrations in 5328 consecutive patients aged 1 month to 102 years. Most patients (3750; 70%) had a normal albumin, but 1158 had hypoalbuminemia (≤3.4 g/dL); 420 had hyperalbuminemia (≥4.7 g/dL). Relationships between serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap were analyzed by linear regression. Results: 309 (27%) hypoalbuminemic patients had a decreased anion gap, and 257 hyperalbuminemic patients (61%) had an increased anion gap. Among the entire group of 5328 patients, there were highly significant correlations between either serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The slope of the regression for albumin versus anion gap was 2.3 mM per g/dL. Using this slope, anion gap could be adjusted for abnormal serum albumin levels: anion gap<sub>adjusted</sub> =anion gap + 2.3 (4-albumin). The initial assessment of an anion gap as being increased, normal, or decreased changed in 44% of the patients with hypo- or hyperalbuminemia once anion gap had been adjusted with this formula. Conclusions: Before considering whether a disorder associated with an increased or decreased anion gap is present, the anion gap should be first adjusted for abnormal serum albumin concentrations. Our data suggest that physicians use 2.3 times the change in serum albumin, whereas those of Figge et al suggest 2.5; either approach gives similar results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","volume":"146 6","pages":"Pages 317-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.008","citationCount":"96","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of hypoalbuminemia or hyperalbuminemia on the serum anion gap\",\"authors\":\"Mark Feldman,&nbsp;Nilam Soni,&nbsp;Beverly Dickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Background: Conflicting data exist as to what extent hypoalbuminemia reduces the anion gap; estimates range from 1.5 to 2.5 mM per g/dL decrease in serum albumin. Methods: We measured serum albumin, total protein, and electrolyte concentrations in 5328 consecutive patients aged 1 month to 102 years. Most patients (3750; 70%) had a normal albumin, but 1158 had hypoalbuminemia (≤3.4 g/dL); 420 had hyperalbuminemia (≥4.7 g/dL). Relationships between serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap were analyzed by linear regression. Results: 309 (27%) hypoalbuminemic patients had a decreased anion gap, and 257 hyperalbuminemic patients (61%) had an increased anion gap. Among the entire group of 5328 patients, there were highly significant correlations between either serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The slope of the regression for albumin versus anion gap was 2.3 mM per g/dL. Using this slope, anion gap could be adjusted for abnormal serum albumin levels: anion gap<sub>adjusted</sub> =anion gap + 2.3 (4-albumin). The initial assessment of an anion gap as being increased, normal, or decreased changed in 44% of the patients with hypo- or hyperalbuminemia once anion gap had been adjusted with this formula. Conclusions: Before considering whether a disorder associated with an increased or decreased anion gap is present, the anion gap should be first adjusted for abnormal serum albumin concentrations. Our data suggest that physicians use 2.3 times the change in serum albumin, whereas those of Figge et al suggest 2.5; either approach gives similar results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"146 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 317-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.07.008\",\"citationCount\":\"96\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002221430500260X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002221430500260X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

摘要

背景:关于低白蛋白血症在多大程度上减少阴离子间隙存在矛盾的数据;估计范围为每克/分升血清白蛋白减少1.5至2.5毫米。方法:我们测量了5328例连续1个月至102岁患者的血清白蛋白、总蛋白和电解质浓度。大多数患者(3750例;70%)白蛋白正常,但1158例有低白蛋白血症(≤3.4 g/dL);420例高白蛋白血症(≥4.7 g/dL)。用线性回归分析血清白蛋白或总蛋白与阴离子间隙的关系。结果:309例(27%)低白蛋白血症患者阴离子间隙减小,257例(61%)高白蛋白血症患者阴离子间隙增大。在整个组5328例患者中,血清白蛋白或总蛋白与阴离子间隙(P <0.001)。白蛋白与阴离子间隙的回归斜率为2.3 mM / g/dL。利用这个斜率,阴离子间隙可以调节异常的血清白蛋白水平:阴离子间隙调节=阴离子间隙+ 2.3(4-白蛋白)。使用此公式调整阴离子间隙后,44%的低或高白蛋白血症患者对阴离子间隙增加、正常或减少的初步评估发生了变化。结论:在考虑是否存在与阴离子间隙增加或减少相关的疾病之前,阴离子间隙应首先根据异常的血清白蛋白浓度进行调整。我们的数据表明,医生使用2.3倍的血清白蛋白变化,而Figge等人的数据显示为2.5倍;两种方法都会得到类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of hypoalbuminemia or hyperalbuminemia on the serum anion gap

Background: Conflicting data exist as to what extent hypoalbuminemia reduces the anion gap; estimates range from 1.5 to 2.5 mM per g/dL decrease in serum albumin. Methods: We measured serum albumin, total protein, and electrolyte concentrations in 5328 consecutive patients aged 1 month to 102 years. Most patients (3750; 70%) had a normal albumin, but 1158 had hypoalbuminemia (≤3.4 g/dL); 420 had hyperalbuminemia (≥4.7 g/dL). Relationships between serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap were analyzed by linear regression. Results: 309 (27%) hypoalbuminemic patients had a decreased anion gap, and 257 hyperalbuminemic patients (61%) had an increased anion gap. Among the entire group of 5328 patients, there were highly significant correlations between either serum albumin or total protein and the anion gap (P < 0.001). The slope of the regression for albumin versus anion gap was 2.3 mM per g/dL. Using this slope, anion gap could be adjusted for abnormal serum albumin levels: anion gapadjusted =anion gap + 2.3 (4-albumin). The initial assessment of an anion gap as being increased, normal, or decreased changed in 44% of the patients with hypo- or hyperalbuminemia once anion gap had been adjusted with this formula. Conclusions: Before considering whether a disorder associated with an increased or decreased anion gap is present, the anion gap should be first adjusted for abnormal serum albumin concentrations. Our data suggest that physicians use 2.3 times the change in serum albumin, whereas those of Figge et al suggest 2.5; either approach gives similar results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Instructions to authors Masthead Contents Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1