支持以社区为基础的老年人长期护理的国家战略。

Nancy A Miller
{"title":"支持以社区为基础的老年人长期护理的国家战略。","authors":"Nancy A Miller","doi":"10.1300/j045v20n04_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>States play a principal role in designing and implementing publicly funded long term care programs. They are in a key position to determine what setting, from whom, and under what philosophy of care individuals can access long term care. State long term care systems have evolved over the past 25 years to support increased availability of community based care for older individuals. States have pursued three broad strategies to increase availability. One set of strategies aims to increase capacity through expanding the supply, public funding and eligibility for a wide array of home and community based services (HCBS). A second set of strategies seeks to constrain institutional growth in order to increase the dollars available for HCBS. Managed/capitated long term care is a third strategy that is a hybrid of the other two approaches. Empirically, increased capacity through use of Medicaid and Medicare resources and growth in the supply of community based care providers, combined with moderation of institutional bed supply, are associated with enhanced access and expenditures for community based long term care. The effectiveness of capitated or managed systems of care varies by model and in some cases is still under study. State fiscal resources are key to the ability to support community based care for the elderly. Targeted federal support may be critical to the continued expansion of community based care, given heterogeneity in state resources, coupled with an increasing demand for long term care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"20 4","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/j045v20n04_01","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State strategies to support community based long term care for the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy A Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/j045v20n04_01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>States play a principal role in designing and implementing publicly funded long term care programs. They are in a key position to determine what setting, from whom, and under what philosophy of care individuals can access long term care. State long term care systems have evolved over the past 25 years to support increased availability of community based care for older individuals. States have pursued three broad strategies to increase availability. One set of strategies aims to increase capacity through expanding the supply, public funding and eligibility for a wide array of home and community based services (HCBS). A second set of strategies seeks to constrain institutional growth in order to increase the dollars available for HCBS. Managed/capitated long term care is a third strategy that is a hybrid of the other two approaches. Empirically, increased capacity through use of Medicaid and Medicare resources and growth in the supply of community based care providers, combined with moderation of institutional bed supply, are associated with enhanced access and expenditures for community based long term care. The effectiveness of capitated or managed systems of care varies by model and in some cases is still under study. State fiscal resources are key to the ability to support community based care for the elderly. Targeted federal support may be critical to the continued expansion of community based care, given heterogeneity in state resources, coupled with an increasing demand for long term care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/j045v20n04_01\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v20n04_01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v20n04_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

各州在设计和实施公共资助的长期护理项目方面发挥着主要作用。他们在决定什么样的环境,从谁那里,以及在什么样的护理理念下,个人可以获得长期护理方面处于关键地位。在过去的25年里,国家长期护理系统不断发展,以支持为老年人提供更多的社区护理。各州采取了三种广泛的战略来增加可获得性。其中一套战略旨在通过扩大各种家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的供应、公共资金和资格来提高能力。第二套策略旨在限制机构增长,以增加可用于hcb的美元。管理/资本化长期护理是第三种策略,它是其他两种方法的混合。经验表明,通过使用医疗补助和医疗保险资源和增加社区护理提供者的供应,结合机构床位供应的适度,增加了社区长期护理的可及性和支出。按人头分配或管理的护理系统的有效性因模式而异,在某些情况下仍在研究中。国家财政资源是支持以社区为基础的老年人护理能力的关键。鉴于各州资源的异质性,加上对长期护理的需求不断增加,有针对性的联邦支持可能对社区护理的持续扩张至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State strategies to support community based long term care for the elderly.

States play a principal role in designing and implementing publicly funded long term care programs. They are in a key position to determine what setting, from whom, and under what philosophy of care individuals can access long term care. State long term care systems have evolved over the past 25 years to support increased availability of community based care for older individuals. States have pursued three broad strategies to increase availability. One set of strategies aims to increase capacity through expanding the supply, public funding and eligibility for a wide array of home and community based services (HCBS). A second set of strategies seeks to constrain institutional growth in order to increase the dollars available for HCBS. Managed/capitated long term care is a third strategy that is a hybrid of the other two approaches. Empirically, increased capacity through use of Medicaid and Medicare resources and growth in the supply of community based care providers, combined with moderation of institutional bed supply, are associated with enhanced access and expenditures for community based long term care. The effectiveness of capitated or managed systems of care varies by model and in some cases is still under study. State fiscal resources are key to the ability to support community based care for the elderly. Targeted federal support may be critical to the continued expansion of community based care, given heterogeneity in state resources, coupled with an increasing demand for long term care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1