肺动脉高压:药物治疗的综合综述。

Erika Berman Rosenzweig, Robyn J Barst
{"title":"肺动脉高压:药物治疗的综合综述。","authors":"Erika Berman Rosenzweig,&nbsp;Robyn J Barst","doi":"10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging due to the serious nature of the disease, its rapid progression, and the limited treatment options available. While oral calcium channel antagonists and continuous intravenous epoprostenol have been used successfully for over a decade, novel treatment options - including prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors - may change the course of this disease for many children in the future.Prostacyclin analogs offer the benefit over continuous intravenous epoprostenol of an alternative delivery system. However, the efficacy of these medications compared with intravenous epoprostenol and the risk/benefits of each analog need to be weighed in future trials, which need to include larger numbers of pediatric patients to optimize therapy and outcome for individual children with PAH.For patients who do not have an acute response to vasodilator testing or have failed treatment with oral calcium channel antagonists, endothelin receptor antagonists may offer a viable treatment option. Furthermore, in the future, the addition of endothelin receptor antagonists to long-term therapy with calcium channel antagonists or to epoprostenol or a prostacyclin analog may increase the overall efficacy of treatment of PAH. Large multi-institutional randomized trials to determine whether sildenafil is effective and safe for the long-term treatment of PAH in children are in progress.A comprehensive review of these newer agents with an emphasis on the pathobiology/pathophysiology of PAH provides insight into the future management of pediatric PAH patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":87162,"journal":{"name":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"117-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary arterial hypertension : a comprehensive review of pharmacological treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Erika Berman Rosenzweig,&nbsp;Robyn J Barst\",\"doi\":\"10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The treatment of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging due to the serious nature of the disease, its rapid progression, and the limited treatment options available. While oral calcium channel antagonists and continuous intravenous epoprostenol have been used successfully for over a decade, novel treatment options - including prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors - may change the course of this disease for many children in the future.Prostacyclin analogs offer the benefit over continuous intravenous epoprostenol of an alternative delivery system. However, the efficacy of these medications compared with intravenous epoprostenol and the risk/benefits of each analog need to be weighed in future trials, which need to include larger numbers of pediatric patients to optimize therapy and outcome for individual children with PAH.For patients who do not have an acute response to vasodilator testing or have failed treatment with oral calcium channel antagonists, endothelin receptor antagonists may offer a viable treatment option. Furthermore, in the future, the addition of endothelin receptor antagonists to long-term therapy with calcium channel antagonists or to epoprostenol or a prostacyclin analog may increase the overall efficacy of treatment of PAH. Large multi-institutional randomized trials to determine whether sildenafil is effective and safe for the long-term treatment of PAH in children are in progress.A comprehensive review of these newer agents with an emphasis on the pathobiology/pathophysiology of PAH provides insight into the future management of pediatric PAH patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"117-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Treatments in respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatments in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605020-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

小儿肺动脉高压(PAH)的治疗是具有挑战性的,由于疾病的严重性,其快速进展,以及有限的治疗方案。虽然口服钙通道拮抗剂和持续静脉注射丙烯醇已经成功使用了十多年,但新的治疗选择——包括前列环素类似物、内皮素受体拮抗剂和磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂——可能会在未来改变许多儿童的病程。前列环素类似物提供优于连续静脉注射的替代递送系统的丙烯醇。然而,与静脉注射epoprostenol相比,这些药物的疗效和每种类似物的风险/益处需要在未来的试验中进行权衡,这些试验需要包括更多的儿科患者,以优化治疗和PAH患儿个体的结果。对于血管扩张剂试验无急性反应或口服钙通道拮抗剂治疗失败的患者,内皮素受体拮抗剂可能是一种可行的治疗选择。此外,在未来,内皮素受体拮抗剂在钙通道拮抗剂或环氧前列醇或前列环素类似物的长期治疗中添加可能会增加治疗PAH的总体疗效。大型多机构随机试验正在进行中,以确定西地那非对儿童多环芳烃的长期治疗是否有效和安全。对这些新药物的全面回顾,重点是PAH的病理生物学/病理生理学,为儿科PAH患者的未来治疗提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pulmonary arterial hypertension : a comprehensive review of pharmacological treatment.

The treatment of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging due to the serious nature of the disease, its rapid progression, and the limited treatment options available. While oral calcium channel antagonists and continuous intravenous epoprostenol have been used successfully for over a decade, novel treatment options - including prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors - may change the course of this disease for many children in the future.Prostacyclin analogs offer the benefit over continuous intravenous epoprostenol of an alternative delivery system. However, the efficacy of these medications compared with intravenous epoprostenol and the risk/benefits of each analog need to be weighed in future trials, which need to include larger numbers of pediatric patients to optimize therapy and outcome for individual children with PAH.For patients who do not have an acute response to vasodilator testing or have failed treatment with oral calcium channel antagonists, endothelin receptor antagonists may offer a viable treatment option. Furthermore, in the future, the addition of endothelin receptor antagonists to long-term therapy with calcium channel antagonists or to epoprostenol or a prostacyclin analog may increase the overall efficacy of treatment of PAH. Large multi-institutional randomized trials to determine whether sildenafil is effective and safe for the long-term treatment of PAH in children are in progress.A comprehensive review of these newer agents with an emphasis on the pathobiology/pathophysiology of PAH provides insight into the future management of pediatric PAH patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Nosocomial pneumonia : rationalizing the approach to empirical therapy. Managing asthma in expectant mothers. New strategies for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease : the rationale for arginine therapy. Antioxidant strategies in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1