自下而上:追踪四项以健康为基础的社会运动对健康和社会政策的影响。

Robert H Keefe, Sandra D Lane, Heidi J Swarts
{"title":"自下而上:追踪四项以健康为基础的社会运动对健康和社会政策的影响。","authors":"Robert H Keefe,&nbsp;Sandra D Lane,&nbsp;Heidi J Swarts","doi":"10.1300/J045v21n03_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although health-based social movements organized by grassroots activists have a rich history in impacting health and social policy, few systematic studies have addressed their policy change efforts or effectiveness. In this article, the authors trace how four health-based social movements-the women's health movement, ACT UP, breast cancer, and needle exchange-influenced health and social policy legislation. The activists' efforts wrested control of \"authoritative knowledge\" that had once been the sole domain of \"experts\" with advanced medical training. They used this knowledge to empower \"average\" people with medical information, promote self help and engage in civil disobedience, which led to changes in healthcare delivery, drug testing and approval, and increased research funds for HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, and needle exchange. The activists' efforts led to other health-based social movements that are currently, or will become, issues for health and social policy analysts in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"21 3","pages":"55-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v21n03_04","citationCount":"99","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the bottom up: tracing the impact of four health-based social movements on health and social policies.\",\"authors\":\"Robert H Keefe,&nbsp;Sandra D Lane,&nbsp;Heidi J Swarts\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J045v21n03_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although health-based social movements organized by grassroots activists have a rich history in impacting health and social policy, few systematic studies have addressed their policy change efforts or effectiveness. In this article, the authors trace how four health-based social movements-the women's health movement, ACT UP, breast cancer, and needle exchange-influenced health and social policy legislation. The activists' efforts wrested control of \\\"authoritative knowledge\\\" that had once been the sole domain of \\\"experts\\\" with advanced medical training. They used this knowledge to empower \\\"average\\\" people with medical information, promote self help and engage in civil disobedience, which led to changes in healthcare delivery, drug testing and approval, and increased research funds for HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, and needle exchange. The activists' efforts led to other health-based social movements that are currently, or will become, issues for health and social policy analysts in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"55-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v21n03_04\",\"citationCount\":\"99\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v21n03_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v21n03_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

摘要

虽然基层活动家组织的以健康为基础的社会运动在影响健康和社会政策方面有着丰富的历史,但很少有系统的研究涉及其政策改变的努力或有效性。在这篇文章中,作者追溯了四个基于健康的社会运动——妇女健康运动、行动起来、乳腺癌和针头交换——是如何影响健康和社会政策立法的。活动人士的努力夺取了“权威知识”的控制权,而这些知识曾经是接受过高级医疗培训的“专家”的专有领域。他们利用这些知识向“普通人”提供医疗信息,促进自助并参与公民不服从,这导致了医疗保健服务、药物测试和批准方面的变化,并增加了艾滋病毒/艾滋病、乳腺癌和针头交换方面的研究资金。这些活动人士的努力导致了其他以健康为基础的社会运动,这些运动目前或将成为未来健康和社会政策分析人士的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the bottom up: tracing the impact of four health-based social movements on health and social policies.

Although health-based social movements organized by grassroots activists have a rich history in impacting health and social policy, few systematic studies have addressed their policy change efforts or effectiveness. In this article, the authors trace how four health-based social movements-the women's health movement, ACT UP, breast cancer, and needle exchange-influenced health and social policy legislation. The activists' efforts wrested control of "authoritative knowledge" that had once been the sole domain of "experts" with advanced medical training. They used this knowledge to empower "average" people with medical information, promote self help and engage in civil disobedience, which led to changes in healthcare delivery, drug testing and approval, and increased research funds for HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, and needle exchange. The activists' efforts led to other health-based social movements that are currently, or will become, issues for health and social policy analysts in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1