医学质量标准:我们能走多远?

E. Minvielle (chercheur CNRS en gestion, responsable scientifique du Projet COMPAQH)
{"title":"医学质量标准:我们能走多远?","authors":"E. Minvielle (chercheur CNRS en gestion, responsable scientifique du Projet COMPAQH)","doi":"10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50783,"journal":{"name":"Annales D Urologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Les critères de qualité en médecine : jusqu'où aller ?\",\"authors\":\"E. Minvielle (chercheur CNRS en gestion, responsable scientifique du Projet COMPAQH)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales D Urologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales D Urologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003440106000246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales D Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003440106000246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对该标准在医学领域的发展进行批判性评价。COMPAQH(衡量绩效和保证医院质量的协调)项目(卫生部/卫生高级当局/国家医学研究所)有助于支持这一分析。该项目基于42个质量指标(QI)的测试,不仅给出了关于建立标准的方式的发现,而且还给出了在医生和医院管理人员之间解释和传播结果的发现。必须以务实的方式制定标准。它们必须符合有科学证据支持的实践指南。相关的风险是创造和发展一种规范的医学。与专业协会合作可能有助于预防这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Les critères de qualité en médecine : jusqu'où aller ?

This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annales D Urologie
Annales D Urologie 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Complications chirurgicales de la transplantation rénale Immunosuppression en transplantation rénale Tumeurs de novo du transplant rénal Chirurgie urologique assistée par robot : principes généraux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1