总胆固醇与其他血脂参数与心血管预后短期预测的关系:德黑兰血脂和血糖研究

Farzad Hadaegh, Hadi Harati, Arash Ghanbarian, Fereidoun Azizi
{"title":"总胆固醇与其他血脂参数与心血管预后短期预测的关系:德黑兰血脂和血糖研究","authors":"Farzad Hadaegh,&nbsp;Hadi Harati,&nbsp;Arash Ghanbarian,&nbsp;Fereidoun Azizi","doi":"10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the role of lipid markers including total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with lipid indices (total/HDL cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol) as predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in adults over 30 years.</p><p><strong>Research design and method: </strong>In a nested case-control study, 207 cardiovascular events among participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) were documented during 3 years of follow-up. Those cases that were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline (132 subjects) were matched to 264 controls for age and sex. In all subjects, demographic and clinical data including blood pressure and anthropometric measurements as well as serum lipids, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose were obtained from the database of the TLGS. We estimated the relative risk for each lipid parameter in a multiple stepwise regression model after adjustment for family history of premature coronary heart disease, smoking, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose and waist-to-hip ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative risks associated with an increase of approximately 1 SD of independent lipid predictors in the multivariate model were as follows: total cholesterol, 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.3 mmol/l; LDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1 mmol/l; non-HDL-cholesterol 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.2 mmol/l and cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1.8. Comparison of these four independent variables with receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed no significant difference in their predictive power for cardiovascular outcome. There was no association between HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL/HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease outcomes in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that for short-term prediction of cardiovascular disease outcome, serum total cholesterol is the preferred lipid parameter to measure in the Iranian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50492,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"571-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca","citationCount":"126","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of total cholesterol versus other serum lipid parameters with the short-term prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Hadaegh,&nbsp;Hadi Harati,&nbsp;Arash Ghanbarian,&nbsp;Fereidoun Azizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the role of lipid markers including total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with lipid indices (total/HDL cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol) as predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in adults over 30 years.</p><p><strong>Research design and method: </strong>In a nested case-control study, 207 cardiovascular events among participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) were documented during 3 years of follow-up. Those cases that were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline (132 subjects) were matched to 264 controls for age and sex. In all subjects, demographic and clinical data including blood pressure and anthropometric measurements as well as serum lipids, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose were obtained from the database of the TLGS. We estimated the relative risk for each lipid parameter in a multiple stepwise regression model after adjustment for family history of premature coronary heart disease, smoking, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose and waist-to-hip ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative risks associated with an increase of approximately 1 SD of independent lipid predictors in the multivariate model were as follows: total cholesterol, 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.3 mmol/l; LDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1 mmol/l; non-HDL-cholesterol 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.2 mmol/l and cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1.8. Comparison of these four independent variables with receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed no significant difference in their predictive power for cardiovascular outcome. There was no association between HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL/HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease outcomes in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that for short-term prediction of cardiovascular disease outcome, serum total cholesterol is the preferred lipid parameter to measure in the Iranian population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"571-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca\",\"citationCount\":\"126\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000216552.81882.ca","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 126

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较脂质标志物(包括总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇)与脂质指标(总/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)在30岁以上成年人心血管结局预测中的作用。研究设计和方法:在一项巢式病例对照研究中,德黑兰脂质和葡萄糖研究(TLGS)的参与者在3年的随访中记录了207例心血管事件。那些在基线时无心血管疾病的病例(132名受试者)与264名按年龄和性别进行对照。所有受试者的人口统计学和临床数据,包括血压和人体测量数据,以及血脂、空腹和2小时血糖,均从TLGS数据库中获取。在调整了早发冠心病家族史、吸烟、收缩压和舒张压、空腹和2小时血糖以及腰臀比后,我们在多元逐步回归模型中估计了每个脂质参数的相对风险。结果:在多变量模型中,独立脂质预测因子增加约1个SD的相对风险如下:总胆固醇1.6 (1.2-2.1),SD=1.3 mmol/l;ldl -胆固醇1.5 (1.1-2.0),SD=1 mmol/l;非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇1.6 (1.2-2.1),SD=1.2 mmol/l;胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇1.5 (1.1-2.0),SD=1.8。将这四个自变量与受试者工作特征曲线分析进行比较,发现它们对心血管结局的预测能力无显著差异。在多变量分析中,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯和低密度脂蛋白/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与心血管疾病结局之间没有关联。结论:对于心血管疾病转归的短期预测,血清总胆固醇似乎是伊朗人群首选的血脂参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of total cholesterol versus other serum lipid parameters with the short-term prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the role of lipid markers including total, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol with lipid indices (total/HDL cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and non-HDL-cholesterol) as predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in adults over 30 years.

Research design and method: In a nested case-control study, 207 cardiovascular events among participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) were documented during 3 years of follow-up. Those cases that were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline (132 subjects) were matched to 264 controls for age and sex. In all subjects, demographic and clinical data including blood pressure and anthropometric measurements as well as serum lipids, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose were obtained from the database of the TLGS. We estimated the relative risk for each lipid parameter in a multiple stepwise regression model after adjustment for family history of premature coronary heart disease, smoking, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting and 2-h plasma glucose and waist-to-hip ratio.

Results: The relative risks associated with an increase of approximately 1 SD of independent lipid predictors in the multivariate model were as follows: total cholesterol, 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.3 mmol/l; LDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1 mmol/l; non-HDL-cholesterol 1.6 (1.2-2.1), SD=1.2 mmol/l and cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol 1.5 (1.1-2.0), SD=1.8. Comparison of these four independent variables with receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed no significant difference in their predictive power for cardiovascular outcome. There was no association between HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL/HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular disease outcomes in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: It seems that for short-term prediction of cardiovascular disease outcome, serum total cholesterol is the preferred lipid parameter to measure in the Iranian population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrauterine growth restriction: no unifying risk factor for the metabolic syndrome in young adults. Moderated Poster Session IV: Exercise physiology Poster Session II: Prevention and health policy: tobacco, economics, clinical trials and quality of care Poster Session II: Epidemiology and public health Poster Session II: Cardiac rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1