睾丸取精方法:切口位置的组织学影响。

B H Gümüs, Y Z Atesçi, O Ucer, T C Karatas, C Buyuksu, N Nese, A R Kandiloglu
{"title":"睾丸取精方法:切口位置的组织学影响。","authors":"B H Gümüs,&nbsp;Y Z Atesçi,&nbsp;O Ucer,&nbsp;T C Karatas,&nbsp;C Buyuksu,&nbsp;N Nese,&nbsp;A R Kandiloglu","doi":"10.1080/01485010600888938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of a transverse vs. longitudinal incision for testicular sperm retrieval. Rats were divided into 4 groups: I: control, II: sham operation, III: longitudinal incision TSRM, IV: transverse incision TSRM. Group II (sham operation) had a dissection of left testis/spermatic cord, then closure of wound. Group III underwent dissection of left testis, then a \"longitudinal\" incision (15 mm long) of testis, which was fully opened then closed again and sutured with 5-0 Vicryl sutures. Group IV underwent dissection of the left testis, opening of the testis with a \"transverse\" incision, then closure with 5-0 Vicryl. The seminiferous tubule diameter was 0.118-0.224 mm in all groups. Inflammation and abscess formation occurred in one testis each in the sham and longitudinal incision groups, and in two testes in the transverse incision group. There were no differences in histopathology or scoring between the longitudinal and the transverse incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":8143,"journal":{"name":"Archives of andrology","volume":"53 1","pages":"33-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01485010600888938","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testicular sperm retrieval method: histological effects of location of incision.\",\"authors\":\"B H Gümüs,&nbsp;Y Z Atesçi,&nbsp;O Ucer,&nbsp;T C Karatas,&nbsp;C Buyuksu,&nbsp;N Nese,&nbsp;A R Kandiloglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01485010600888938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of a transverse vs. longitudinal incision for testicular sperm retrieval. Rats were divided into 4 groups: I: control, II: sham operation, III: longitudinal incision TSRM, IV: transverse incision TSRM. Group II (sham operation) had a dissection of left testis/spermatic cord, then closure of wound. Group III underwent dissection of left testis, then a \\\"longitudinal\\\" incision (15 mm long) of testis, which was fully opened then closed again and sutured with 5-0 Vicryl sutures. Group IV underwent dissection of the left testis, opening of the testis with a \\\"transverse\\\" incision, then closure with 5-0 Vicryl. The seminiferous tubule diameter was 0.118-0.224 mm in all groups. Inflammation and abscess formation occurred in one testis each in the sham and longitudinal incision groups, and in two testes in the transverse incision group. There were no differences in histopathology or scoring between the longitudinal and the transverse incision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of andrology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"33-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01485010600888938\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01485010600888938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01485010600888938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在评估睾丸取精时横向切口与纵向切口的效果。大鼠分为4组:I:对照组,II:假手术组,III:纵切口TSRM组,IV:横切口TSRM组。第二组(假手术)先切除左睾丸/精索,然后缝合伤口。III组左侧睾丸解剖,行睾丸“纵向”切口(15mm长),完全打开后闭合,用5-0 Vicryl缝线缝合。IV组左侧睾丸解剖,用“横向”切口打开睾丸,然后用5-0 Vicryl闭合。各组精管直径均在0.118 ~ 0.224 mm之间。假手术组和纵切组各1个睾丸出现炎症和脓肿,横切组2个睾丸出现炎症和脓肿。纵向和横向切口在组织病理学和评分上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testicular sperm retrieval method: histological effects of location of incision.

This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of a transverse vs. longitudinal incision for testicular sperm retrieval. Rats were divided into 4 groups: I: control, II: sham operation, III: longitudinal incision TSRM, IV: transverse incision TSRM. Group II (sham operation) had a dissection of left testis/spermatic cord, then closure of wound. Group III underwent dissection of left testis, then a "longitudinal" incision (15 mm long) of testis, which was fully opened then closed again and sutured with 5-0 Vicryl sutures. Group IV underwent dissection of the left testis, opening of the testis with a "transverse" incision, then closure with 5-0 Vicryl. The seminiferous tubule diameter was 0.118-0.224 mm in all groups. Inflammation and abscess formation occurred in one testis each in the sham and longitudinal incision groups, and in two testes in the transverse incision group. There were no differences in histopathology or scoring between the longitudinal and the transverse incision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human spermatozoa ultrastructure assessment in the infertility treatment by assisted reproduction technique. Human umbilical cord blood serum in culture medium on oocyte maturation In vitro. Recovery and cryopreservation of Spanish ibex epididymal spermatozoa. Testicular microlithiasis in Taiwanese men. AZF gene expression analysis in peripheral leukocytes and testicular cells from idiopathic infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1