动物上皮标准化。

Enrique Fernández-Caldas, Jerónimo Carnés, Mayte Gallego, Adriano Mari, Juan Antonio Pagán Alemán
{"title":"动物上皮标准化。","authors":"Enrique Fernández-Caldas,&nbsp;Jerónimo Carnés,&nbsp;Mayte Gallego,&nbsp;Adriano Mari,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Pagán Alemán","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standardization of animal epithelia is warranted for an accurate diagnosis and safe and efficacious treatment of allergic respiratory diseases induced by the inhalation of mammalian aeroallergens. We have compared several sources of raw materials of cat, hamster, goat and rabbit hair and epithelia to establish differences between the protein and allergenic composition of these extracts. The main differences in these raw materials was that \"epithelia\" were supplied as a mixture of hair and epithelia previously treated with acetone, and that the hair was supplied and used untreated. A possible influence of the age of rabbits on the composition of rabbit hair extracts was also evaluated. Overall, important differences were detected in the composition of epithelia versus hair extracts. Epithelia extracts contained more irrelevant proteins and, in most cases, less amounts of major allergens. Important differences were also detected in the composition of the extracts prepared with hair of young versus adult animals. In general, the extracts derived from young animals contained less major allergen and more albumin than those derived from older animals. A greater effort should be made to identify the ideal sources of animal skin derived allergen extracts to provide the allergologists with better extracts for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. There is also a need for a consensus on the terminology applied to animal skin derived extracts. The use of the term dander extracts seems to be more appropriate. These extracts contain more relevant allergens and fewer albumins.</p>","PeriodicalId":77490,"journal":{"name":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","volume":" 95","pages":"107-16; discussion 116, 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization of animal epithelia.\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Fernández-Caldas,&nbsp;Jerónimo Carnés,&nbsp;Mayte Gallego,&nbsp;Adriano Mari,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Pagán Alemán\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The standardization of animal epithelia is warranted for an accurate diagnosis and safe and efficacious treatment of allergic respiratory diseases induced by the inhalation of mammalian aeroallergens. We have compared several sources of raw materials of cat, hamster, goat and rabbit hair and epithelia to establish differences between the protein and allergenic composition of these extracts. The main differences in these raw materials was that \\\"epithelia\\\" were supplied as a mixture of hair and epithelia previously treated with acetone, and that the hair was supplied and used untreated. A possible influence of the age of rabbits on the composition of rabbit hair extracts was also evaluated. Overall, important differences were detected in the composition of epithelia versus hair extracts. Epithelia extracts contained more irrelevant proteins and, in most cases, less amounts of major allergens. Important differences were also detected in the composition of the extracts prepared with hair of young versus adult animals. In general, the extracts derived from young animals contained less major allergen and more albumin than those derived from older animals. A greater effort should be made to identify the ideal sources of animal skin derived allergen extracts to provide the allergologists with better extracts for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. There is also a need for a consensus on the terminology applied to animal skin derived extracts. The use of the term dander extracts seems to be more appropriate. These extracts contain more relevant allergens and fewer albumins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"volume\":\" 95\",\"pages\":\"107-16; discussion 116, 155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeiten aus dem Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (Bundesamt fur Sera und Impfstoffe) zu Frankfurt a.M","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物上皮的标准化是准确诊断和安全有效治疗由哺乳动物空气过敏原吸入引起的过敏性呼吸道疾病的必要条件。我们比较了几种来源的猫、仓鼠、山羊和兔毛的原料和上皮,以确定这些提取物的蛋白质和致敏成分之间的差异。这些原料的主要区别在于,“上皮”是毛发和先前用丙酮处理过的上皮的混合物,而毛发是未经处理的。对兔年龄对兔毛提取物成分的影响进行了评价。总的来说,在上皮细胞和头发提取物的组成中发现了重要的差异。上皮细胞提取物含有更多的无关蛋白,在大多数情况下,主要过敏原的含量较少。用幼龄动物毛发和成年动物毛发制备的提取物的组成也存在重要差异。一般来说,从幼龄动物身上提取的提取物比从老年动物身上提取的提取物含有更少的主要过敏原和更多的白蛋白。应进一步努力确定动物皮肤源性过敏原提取物的理想来源,为过敏专科医生提供更好的提取物,用于过敏性呼吸道疾病的诊断和治疗。还需要就动物皮肤提取物的术语达成共识。用皮屑提取物这个词似乎更合适。这些提取物含有更多的相关过敏原和更少的白蛋白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standardization of animal epithelia.

The standardization of animal epithelia is warranted for an accurate diagnosis and safe and efficacious treatment of allergic respiratory diseases induced by the inhalation of mammalian aeroallergens. We have compared several sources of raw materials of cat, hamster, goat and rabbit hair and epithelia to establish differences between the protein and allergenic composition of these extracts. The main differences in these raw materials was that "epithelia" were supplied as a mixture of hair and epithelia previously treated with acetone, and that the hair was supplied and used untreated. A possible influence of the age of rabbits on the composition of rabbit hair extracts was also evaluated. Overall, important differences were detected in the composition of epithelia versus hair extracts. Epithelia extracts contained more irrelevant proteins and, in most cases, less amounts of major allergens. Important differences were also detected in the composition of the extracts prepared with hair of young versus adult animals. In general, the extracts derived from young animals contained less major allergen and more albumin than those derived from older animals. A greater effort should be made to identify the ideal sources of animal skin derived allergen extracts to provide the allergologists with better extracts for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. There is also a need for a consensus on the terminology applied to animal skin derived extracts. The use of the term dander extracts seems to be more appropriate. These extracts contain more relevant allergens and fewer albumins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International units. Regulatory aspects of allergen products for immunotherapy--considerations from the viewpoint of manufacturers. EU procedures for marketing authorization of pharmaceutical products. Marketing authorization for recombinant products in Europe. The CREATE project: an introduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1