单侧上斜肌麻痹患者的上斜肌MRI不对称和垂直偏离。

Felisa Shokida, Martin Eleta, Jose Gabriel, Celia Sanchez, Fernanda Seclen
{"title":"单侧上斜肌麻痹患者的上斜肌MRI不对称和垂直偏离。","authors":"Felisa Shokida,&nbsp;Martin Eleta,&nbsp;Jose Gabriel,&nbsp;Celia Sanchez,&nbsp;Fernanda Seclen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the MRI cross sectional greater area of the unilateral superior oblique (SO) muscle in patients with congenital or acquired superior oblique palsy to detect asymmetries and to determine if there is any relationship between the degree of vertical deviation and the muscle size determined by imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic Resonance Imaging coronal images were obtained in primary position, supraversion and infraversion. Interocular differences and intergroup differences were compared in 17 patients with unilateral acquired or congenital SO palsy and 15 orthotropic control subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean maximal difference was 3.56 +/-0.83 mm(2) (p 0.01) between healthy and paretic eye in the paretic group, and 1.08 +/-0.40 mm(2) (p 0.02) in the control group. Statistical Intergroup comparison was p 0.02 (conventionally statistically significant). In 9 patients the maximal interocular difference was detected in 44.4% in infraversion, 33.3% indistinctly in supra- and infraversion and 22.2% in primary position. The correlation coefficient between vertical deviation and interocular asymmetry was not conventionally statistically significant at p>0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy showed significant MRI asymmetry, which was represented by a relatively greater healthy SO muscle size, in the paretic congenital group. We found no association between the SO muscle size and the degree of any vertical deviation present.</p>","PeriodicalId":79564,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","volume":"21 3","pages":"137-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior oblique muscle MRI asymmetry and vertical deviation in patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Felisa Shokida,&nbsp;Martin Eleta,&nbsp;Jose Gabriel,&nbsp;Celia Sanchez,&nbsp;Fernanda Seclen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the MRI cross sectional greater area of the unilateral superior oblique (SO) muscle in patients with congenital or acquired superior oblique palsy to detect asymmetries and to determine if there is any relationship between the degree of vertical deviation and the muscle size determined by imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic Resonance Imaging coronal images were obtained in primary position, supraversion and infraversion. Interocular differences and intergroup differences were compared in 17 patients with unilateral acquired or congenital SO palsy and 15 orthotropic control subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean maximal difference was 3.56 +/-0.83 mm(2) (p 0.01) between healthy and paretic eye in the paretic group, and 1.08 +/-0.40 mm(2) (p 0.02) in the control group. Statistical Intergroup comparison was p 0.02 (conventionally statistically significant). In 9 patients the maximal interocular difference was detected in 44.4% in infraversion, 33.3% indistinctly in supra- and infraversion and 22.2% in primary position. The correlation coefficient between vertical deviation and interocular asymmetry was not conventionally statistically significant at p>0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy showed significant MRI asymmetry, which was represented by a relatively greater healthy SO muscle size, in the paretic congenital group. We found no association between the SO muscle size and the degree of any vertical deviation present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"137-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价先天性或后天性上斜肌麻痹患者单侧上斜肌(SO)的MRI横截面积,以发现不对称,并确定垂直偏离程度与影像学确定的肌肉大小之间是否存在关系。方法:分别在原发位、上位和下位进行磁共振成像。比较17例单侧获得性或先天性SO性麻痹患者和15例正异性对照者的眼间差异和组间差异。结果:正常组与轻视组最大平均差值为3.56±0.83 mm(2) (p 0.01),对照组最大平均差值为1.08±0.40 mm(2) (p 0.02)。组间比较p为0.02(具有常规统计学意义)。9例患者中,44.4%的患者眼内视差最大,33.3%的患者眼内视差不明显,22.2%的患者眼内视差最大。垂直偏差与眼间不对称的相关系数p>0.05,无统计学意义。结论:单侧上斜肌麻痹患者在先天性麻痹组中表现出明显的MRI不对称性,表现为相对较大的健康SO肌大小。我们没有发现SO肌肉大小和任何垂直偏差存在的程度之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Superior oblique muscle MRI asymmetry and vertical deviation in patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy.

Purpose: To evaluate the MRI cross sectional greater area of the unilateral superior oblique (SO) muscle in patients with congenital or acquired superior oblique palsy to detect asymmetries and to determine if there is any relationship between the degree of vertical deviation and the muscle size determined by imaging.

Methods: Magnetic Resonance Imaging coronal images were obtained in primary position, supraversion and infraversion. Interocular differences and intergroup differences were compared in 17 patients with unilateral acquired or congenital SO palsy and 15 orthotropic control subjects.

Results: Mean maximal difference was 3.56 +/-0.83 mm(2) (p 0.01) between healthy and paretic eye in the paretic group, and 1.08 +/-0.40 mm(2) (p 0.02) in the control group. Statistical Intergroup comparison was p 0.02 (conventionally statistically significant). In 9 patients the maximal interocular difference was detected in 44.4% in infraversion, 33.3% indistinctly in supra- and infraversion and 22.2% in primary position. The correlation coefficient between vertical deviation and interocular asymmetry was not conventionally statistically significant at p>0.05.

Conclusions: Patients with unilateral superior oblique palsy showed significant MRI asymmetry, which was represented by a relatively greater healthy SO muscle size, in the paretic congenital group. We found no association between the SO muscle size and the degree of any vertical deviation present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Five simple rules for treating pediatric intermitttent exotropia strabismus. Future of medicine and the profession; universal serotonin addiction? exotropia five rules; safer strabismus surgery; pinealoma; MS Corectopia. A new modfied anchored suspension-recession (so-called "hang-back" technique for high risk strabismus surgery. Isolated inferior rectus paresis with falling eye phenomenon of the contralateral eye in a patient with pineal tumor: a case report. Incidental detection of bilateral corectopia by photo screening leads to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1