新的以患者为导向的二分法诊断测试的确定性净总增益汇总测量。

Shai Linn, Peter D Grunau
{"title":"新的以患者为导向的二分法诊断测试的确定性净总增益汇总测量。","authors":"Shai Linn, Peter D Grunau","doi":"10.1186/1742-5573-3-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To introduce a new, patient-oriented predictive index as a measure of gain in certainty.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Algebraic equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A new measure is suggested based on error rates in a patient population. The new Predictive Summary Index (PSI) reflects the true total gain in certainty obtained by performing a diagnostic test based on knowledge of disease prevalence, i.e., the overall additional certainty. We show that the overall gain in certainty can be expressed in the form of the following expression: PSI = PPV+NPV-1. PSI is a more comprehensive measure than the post-test probability or the Youden Index (J). The reciprocal of J is interpreted as the number of persons with a given disease who need to be examined in order to detect correctly one person with the disease. The reciprocal of PSI is suggested as the number of persons who need to be examined in order to correctly predict a diagnosis of the disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSI provides more information than J and the predictive values, making it more appropriate in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":87082,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","volume":"3 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New patient-oriented summary measure of net total gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests.\",\"authors\":\"Shai Linn, Peter D Grunau\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1742-5573-3-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To introduce a new, patient-oriented predictive index as a measure of gain in certainty.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Algebraic equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A new measure is suggested based on error rates in a patient population. The new Predictive Summary Index (PSI) reflects the true total gain in certainty obtained by performing a diagnostic test based on knowledge of disease prevalence, i.e., the overall additional certainty. We show that the overall gain in certainty can be expressed in the form of the following expression: PSI = PPV+NPV-1. PSI is a more comprehensive measure than the post-test probability or the Youden Index (J). The reciprocal of J is interpreted as the number of persons with a given disease who need to be examined in order to detect correctly one person with the disease. The reciprocal of PSI is suggested as the number of persons who need to be examined in order to correctly predict a diagnosis of the disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSI provides more information than J and the predictive values, making it more appropriate in a clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:引入一种新的、以患者为导向的预测指数,作为确定性增益的衡量标准。研究设计:代数方程。结果:根据患者群体的错误率提出了一种新的测量方法。新的预测汇总指数(PSI)反映了通过基于疾病流行率的知识进行诊断测试所获得的确定性的真实总增益,即总体附加确定性。我们表明,确定性的总体增益可以用以下表达式的形式表示:PSI=PPV+NPV-1。PSI是比测试后概率或尤登指数(J)更全面的衡量标准。J的倒数被解释为需要对特定疾病进行检查以正确检测出一名患者的人数。PSI的倒数被认为是需要进行检查以正确预测疾病诊断的人数。结论:PSI比J提供了更多的信息和预测值,使其在临床环境中更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New patient-oriented summary measure of net total gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests.

Objectives: To introduce a new, patient-oriented predictive index as a measure of gain in certainty.

Study design: Algebraic equations.

Results: A new measure is suggested based on error rates in a patient population. The new Predictive Summary Index (PSI) reflects the true total gain in certainty obtained by performing a diagnostic test based on knowledge of disease prevalence, i.e., the overall additional certainty. We show that the overall gain in certainty can be expressed in the form of the following expression: PSI = PPV+NPV-1. PSI is a more comprehensive measure than the post-test probability or the Youden Index (J). The reciprocal of J is interpreted as the number of persons with a given disease who need to be examined in order to detect correctly one person with the disease. The reciprocal of PSI is suggested as the number of persons who need to be examined in order to correctly predict a diagnosis of the disease.

Conclusion: PSI provides more information than J and the predictive values, making it more appropriate in a clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extending the sufficient component cause model to describe the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA). Use of the integrated health interview series: trends in medical provider utilization (1972-2008). Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. The use of complete-case and multiple imputation-based analyses in molecular epidemiology studies that assess interaction effects. Attributing the burden of cancer at work: three areas of concern when examining the example of shift-work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1