美国各州儿童免疫覆盖率:州政策干预和规划支持的影响

Brian K Collins, Helen E Morrow, Jennifer M Ramirez, Clarke E Cochran, David R Smith
{"title":"美国各州儿童免疫覆盖率:州政策干预和规划支持的影响","authors":"Brian K Collins,&nbsp;Helen E Morrow,&nbsp;Jennifer M Ramirez,&nbsp;Clarke E Cochran,&nbsp;David R Smith","doi":"10.1300/J045v22n01_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although research suggests numerous interventions that can improve immunization coverage (Taskforce on Community Preventive Services, 2000), there is often a gap between policies supported by and public entities. The question for this study is whether the variation in childhood (19 to 35 months) immunization coverage rates across states is related to significant variations in state regulatory regimes that may optimize the benefits of state registries and systems that are designed to improve assessment of immunization practices. Utilizing 2002 data from the CDC and survey data collected from state immunization program officials, we find that financial support for state immunization programs, opt-out state registries, and state-mandated participation in provider quality improvement and assessment programs have positive associations with statewide coverage rates. We also suggest that more active state governmental support for interventions supported by rigorous scientific evaluation will not only improve early childhood immunization coverage, but may also support other public health objectives such as life-time full immunization and improve bioterrorism response planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"77-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n01_06","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood immunization coverage in US states: the impact of state policy interventions and programmatic support.\",\"authors\":\"Brian K Collins,&nbsp;Helen E Morrow,&nbsp;Jennifer M Ramirez,&nbsp;Clarke E Cochran,&nbsp;David R Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J045v22n01_06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although research suggests numerous interventions that can improve immunization coverage (Taskforce on Community Preventive Services, 2000), there is often a gap between policies supported by and public entities. The question for this study is whether the variation in childhood (19 to 35 months) immunization coverage rates across states is related to significant variations in state regulatory regimes that may optimize the benefits of state registries and systems that are designed to improve assessment of immunization practices. Utilizing 2002 data from the CDC and survey data collected from state immunization program officials, we find that financial support for state immunization programs, opt-out state registries, and state-mandated participation in provider quality improvement and assessment programs have positive associations with statewide coverage rates. We also suggest that more active state governmental support for interventions supported by rigorous scientific evaluation will not only improve early childhood immunization coverage, but may also support other public health objectives such as life-time full immunization and improve bioterrorism response planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"77-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J045v22n01_06\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health & social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n01_06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v22n01_06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

虽然研究表明有许多干预措施可以改善免疫接种覆盖率(社区预防服务工作队,2000年),但公共实体和公共实体支持的政策之间往往存在差距。本研究的问题是,各州儿童(19至35个月)免疫覆盖率的差异是否与各州监管制度的显著差异有关,这些制度可能会优化旨在改善免疫实践评估的州登记处和系统的效益。利用2002年美国疾病控制与预防中心的数据和从州免疫计划官员收集的调查数据,我们发现对州免疫计划的财政支持,选择退出州登记,以及州强制参与提供者质量改进和评估计划与全州覆盖率呈正相关。我们还建议,在严格的科学评估支持下,更积极的州政府支持干预措施,不仅可以提高儿童早期免疫覆盖率,还可以支持其他公共卫生目标,如终身全面免疫和改善生物恐怖主义应对规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Childhood immunization coverage in US states: the impact of state policy interventions and programmatic support.

Although research suggests numerous interventions that can improve immunization coverage (Taskforce on Community Preventive Services, 2000), there is often a gap between policies supported by and public entities. The question for this study is whether the variation in childhood (19 to 35 months) immunization coverage rates across states is related to significant variations in state regulatory regimes that may optimize the benefits of state registries and systems that are designed to improve assessment of immunization practices. Utilizing 2002 data from the CDC and survey data collected from state immunization program officials, we find that financial support for state immunization programs, opt-out state registries, and state-mandated participation in provider quality improvement and assessment programs have positive associations with statewide coverage rates. We also suggest that more active state governmental support for interventions supported by rigorous scientific evaluation will not only improve early childhood immunization coverage, but may also support other public health objectives such as life-time full immunization and improve bioterrorism response planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1